ASAN
Price
$7.39
Change
-$0.07 (-0.94%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.7B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZM
Price
$93.68
Change
+$1.36 (+1.47%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
27.47B
71 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASAN vs ZM

Header iconASAN vs ZM Comparison
Open Charts ASAN vs ZMBanner chart's image
ASAN vs ZM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASAN vs. ZM commentary
Jun 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASAN is a Hold and ZM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2026
Stock price -- (ASAN: $7.39 vs. ZM: $93.68)
Brand notoriety: ASAN: Not notable vs. ZM: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASAN: 77% vs. ZM: 66%
Market capitalization -- ASAN: $1.7B vs. ZM: $27.47B
ASAN [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.7B. ZM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $27.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASAN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASAN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZM is a better buy in the long-term than ASAN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASAN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASAN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ZM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASAN is a better buy in the short-term than ZM.

Price Growth

ASAN (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.74% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was -7.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASAN is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2026.

ZM is expected to report earnings on Aug 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.27% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZM($27.5B) has a higher market cap than ASAN($1.7B). ZM YTD gains are higher at: 8.564 vs. ASAN (-46.098). ZM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.32B vs. ASAN (-132.16M). ZM has more cash in the bank: 7.72B vs. ASAN (425M). ZM has less debt than ASAN: ZM (60.2M) vs ASAN (248M). ZM has higher revenues than ASAN: ZM (4.93B) vs ASAN (809M).
ASANZMASAN / ZM
Capitalization1.7B27.5B6%
EBITDA-132.16M1.32B-10%
Gain YTD-46.0988.564-538%
P/E RatioN/A13.80-
Revenue809M4.93B16%
Total Cash425M7.72B6%
Total Debt248M60.2M412%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ZM: Fundamental Ratings
ZM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
61
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
43
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
89
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASANZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CIF1.620.02
+1.25%
MFS Intermediate High Income Fund
FXG63.730.30
+0.47%
First Trust Cnsmr Staples AlphaDEX® ETF
BKIE100.530.43
+0.43%
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
BCLO49.750.04
+0.08%
iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF
VUSG62.590.02
+0.04%
Vanguard Wellington U.S. Gr Actv ETF

ZM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZM has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZM
1D Price
Change %
ZM100%
+1.47%
COIN - ZM
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
CLSK - ZM
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
COMP - ZM
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
RIOT - ZM
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.80%
ASAN - ZM
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
More