Advertisement
ASAN vs TEAM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Asana (ASAN) vs. Atlassian (TEAM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Asana (ASAN) and Atlassian (TEAM) both operate in the collaborative work management software sector, with overlapping focus on project tracking and team productivity tools.
- Recent market activity showed both stocks posting gains on July 24, 2026, with TEAM rising 8.40% to $86.88 and ASAN advancing 4.41% to $6.86.
- TEAM maintains a significantly larger market capitalization of approximately $22.0 billion compared to ASAN's $1.58 billion, reflecting differences in scale and product breadth.
- Both companies reported net losses in recent periods, with ASAN posting an EPS of -$0.69 (TTM) and TEAM at -$0.82 (TTM), amid investments in AI-enhanced features.
- Sector exposure centers on technology and software applications, where AI integration in tools like Jira for TEAM and Asana AI Studio for ASAN represents a shared growth driver.
- Relative performance highlights TEAM's broader analyst price targets averaging $139.70 versus ASAN's $9.13, though both face ongoing profitability challenges.
Introduction
This comparison examines Asana (ASAN) and Atlassian (TEAM), two publicly traded companies in the collaborative software space. Investors and traders focused on the technology sector, particularly those evaluating relative performance between smaller-cap and mid-cap software names, may find the analysis relevant. The review highlights business models, recent stock behavior in the current market environment, and key contrasts in scale, momentum, and positioning without offering investment recommendations.
ASAN Overview and Recent Performance
Asana, Inc. provides a work management platform that supports project planning, task tracking, and team collaboration through its proprietary Work Graph data model. The company has expanded into AI capabilities, including Asana AI Studio for workflow automation and AI Teammates for collaborative assistance. In recent market activity, ASAN shares traded near the lower end of their 52-week range of $5.38 to $15.71, closing at $6.86 on July 24, 2026, up 4.41% amid broader sector movements. Trailing twelve-month revenue reached $808.63 million, though the company continues to report net losses with an EPS of -$0.69. Sentiment has been influenced by ongoing AI product development and hybrid go-to-market strategies serving diverse industries.
TEAM Overview and Recent Performance
Atlassian Corporation delivers collaboration software including Jira for project management and Confluence for knowledge sharing, alongside tools such as Loom and Rovo for AI-assisted features. Recent announcements have emphasized AI-native systems for software development workflows within Jira. In recent market activity, TEAM shares exhibited volatility, closing at $86.88 on July 24, 2026, up 8.40% from the prior session, within a 52-week range of $56.01 to $206.00. Trailing twelve-month revenue stood at $6.19 billion with an EPS of -$0.82. Market positioning has reflected analyst attention on AI adoption and backlog metrics, alongside periodic price target adjustments from firms monitoring the technology sector.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots designed for current market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers across varied styles, strategies, timeframes, performances, statistics, and ticker sets. Only the strongest and most suitable bots for prevailing conditions appear in this section. Available bots demonstrate a range of historical metrics, including varying win rates, profit factors, and drawdown profiles depending on their specific configurations and market environments. This resource provides traders with data-driven options for automated strategies. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for additional details.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Asana (ASAN) and Atlassian (TEAM) differ markedly in scale, with TEAM’s market capitalization exceeding $22 billion compared to ASAN’s $1.58 billion. Business models overlap in project and team management but diverge in breadth: TEAM offers an extensive suite including source code tools and service management, while ASAN emphasizes a focused work graph platform. Growth drivers center on AI integration for both, though TEAM’s recent Jira enhancements target software development workflows more directly. Recent momentum showed TEAM experiencing larger single-day moves amid volatility, whereas ASAN traded within a narrower band near yearly lows. Risk factors include sustained net losses and high valuation multiples relative to earnings for both, with TEAM displaying greater beta exposure at 1.11 versus ASAN’s 0.96. Sector exposure remains concentrated in software applications, where market sentiment favors companies demonstrating clear AI monetization paths and stable revenue growth.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, scale advantages, and recent AI-related catalysts, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a probabilistic preference toward TEAM. The larger company’s broader product ecosystem and higher average analyst targets may indicate relatively stronger positioning in the current environment, though both names exhibit ongoing challenges with profitability and sector-wide volatility. This assessment reflects data patterns rather than definitive forecasts.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASAN is a Buy and TEAM is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASAN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTEAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ASAN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TEAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASAN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEAM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ASAN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TEAM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ASAN (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.24% price change this week, while TEAM (@Packaged Software) price change was +36.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.27%.
Reported Earning Dates
ASAN is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2026.
TEAM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+3.77% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| ASAN | TEAM | ASAN / TEAM | |
| Capitalization | 2.28B | 42.1B | 5% |
| EBITDA | -132.16M | -21.17M | 624% |
| Gain YTD | -34.427 | -4.256 | 809% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 809M | 6.19B | 13% |
| Total Cash | 425M | 1.14B | 37% |
| Total Debt | 248M | 1.24B | 20% |
ASAN | TEAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 46 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ASAN's Valuation (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEAM (98) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ASAN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
ASAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TEAM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ASAN’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's SMR Rating (97) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ASAN (99) in the null industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew similarly to ASAN’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ASAN (38) in the null industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew similarly to ASAN’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASAN (100) in the null industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew significantly faster than ASAN’s over the last 12 months.
| ASAN | TEAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 85% | 22 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
ASAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASAN has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASAN jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASAN | 100% | -2.81% | ||
| FRSH - ASAN | 75% Closely correlated | -2.72% | ||
| TEAM - ASAN | 74% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| WDAY - ASAN | 74% Closely correlated | -3.30% | ||
| CRM - ASAN | 70% Closely correlated | -2.10% | ||
| HUBS - ASAN | 70% Closely correlated | -4.71% | ||
More | ||||
TEAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEAM has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEAM jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TEAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEAM | 100% | +0.75% | ||
| HUBS - TEAM | 75% Closely correlated | -4.71% | ||
| CRM - TEAM | 74% Closely correlated | -2.10% | ||
| WDAY - TEAM | 72% Closely correlated | -3.30% | ||
| ASAN - TEAM | 71% Closely correlated | -2.81% | ||
| SPT - TEAM | 67% Closely correlated | -3.58% | ||
More | ||||