ASBFY
Price
$30.27
Change
+$0.34 (+1.14%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
21B
5 days until earnings call
MDLZ
Price
$61.77
Change
+$0.87 (+1.43%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
78.8B
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASBFY vs MDLZ

Header iconASBFY vs MDLZ Comparison
Open Charts ASBFY vs MDLZBanner chart's image
Associated British Foods
Price$30.27
Change+$0.34 (+1.14%)
Volume$10.24K
Capitalization21B
Mondelez International
Price$61.77
Change+$0.87 (+1.43%)
Volume$162.9K
Capitalization78.8B
ASBFY vs MDLZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MDLZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASBFY vs. MDLZ commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASBFY is a Hold and MDLZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (ASBFY: $30.27 vs. MDLZ: $60.90)
Brand notoriety: ASBFY: Not notable vs. MDLZ: Notable
ASBFY represents the Food: Major Diversified, while MDLZ is part of the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASBFY: 48% vs. MDLZ: 59%
Market capitalization -- ASBFY: $21B vs. MDLZ: $78.8B
ASBFY [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $21B. MDLZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $78.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $242.42B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $78.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.12B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $15.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASBFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASBFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MDLZ is a better buy in the long-term than ASBFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASBFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASBFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MDLZ is a better buy in the short-term than ASBFY.

Price Growth

ASBFY (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +1.37% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +821.63%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASBFY is expected to report earnings on Sep 10, 2025.

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.61% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.34% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDLZ($78.8B) has a higher market cap than ASBFY($21B). MDLZ has higher P/E ratio than ASBFY: MDLZ (22.31) vs ASBFY (12.76). ASBFY YTD gains are higher at: 19.787 vs. MDLZ (3.388). MDLZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6B vs. ASBFY (2.97B). MDLZ has higher revenues than ASBFY: MDLZ (37.1B) vs ASBFY (19.8B).
ASBFYMDLZASBFY / MDLZ
Capitalization21B78.8B27%
EBITDA2.97B6B50%
Gain YTD19.7873.388584%
P/E Ratio12.7622.3157%
Revenue19.8B37.1B53%
Total CashN/A1.5B-
Total DebtN/A21.5B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASBFY vs MDLZ: Fundamental Ratings
ASBFY
MDLZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7554
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6760
SMR RATING
1..100
5357
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5262
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7767
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASBFY's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as MDLZ (34) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that ASBFY’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as ASBFY (67) in the null industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to ASBFY’s over the last 12 months.

ASBFY's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as MDLZ (57) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that ASBFY’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

ASBFY's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as MDLZ (62) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that ASBFY’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as ASBFY (77) in the null industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to ASBFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASBFYMDLZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MDLZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARGT79.781.98
+2.54%
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF
VBK293.983.33
+1.15%
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
IJUN28.110.16
+0.57%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - Jun
BSMT22.990.07
+0.29%
Invesco BulletShares 2029 Muncpl Bd ETF
USL35.87-0.40
-1.11%
United States 12 Month Oil

ASBFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASBFY and HNFSA have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASBFY and HNFSA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASBFY
1D Price
Change %
ASBFY100%
+1.14%
HNFSA - ASBFY
29%
Poorly correlated
-13.46%
SAPIF - ASBFY
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
USNA - ASBFY
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
DAR - ASBFY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
MDLZ - ASBFY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
More

MDLZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDLZ
1D Price
Change %
MDLZ100%
-0.65%
GIS - MDLZ
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
CAG - MDLZ
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
HSY - MDLZ
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
CPB - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.17%
KHC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
More