CATY
Price
$63.70
Change
+$0.33 (+0.52%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
4.23B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ONB
Price
$26.84
Change
+$0.31 (+1.17%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.14B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CATY vs ONB

CATY vs ONB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) vs. Old National Bancorp (ONB) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CATY has delivered stronger year-to-date returns of approximately 30%, outpacing ONB's roughly 17–20% gain, reflecting divergent momentum trajectories within the regional banking sector.
  • Cathay General Bancorp operates with a significantly higher net profit margin of roughly 24%, compared to Old National Bancorp's approximately 19%, underscoring CATY's leaner operational structure despite its smaller asset base.
  • Old National Bancorp's market capitalization of roughly $10 billion and $72 billion in total assets dwarf CATY's ~$4.2 billion market cap and ~$24 billion asset base, offering ONB greater scale, geographic diversification, and institutional liquidity.
  • Both banks have benefited from net interest margin (NIM, a key measure of lending profitability) expansion in recent quarters, with ONB reporting a NIM of 3.55–3.64% and CATY reaching 3.36–3.43%, supported by disciplined deposit cost management.
  • Dividend yields are comparable at approximately 2.2–2.5%, and both companies maintain healthy payout ratios below 32%, appealing to income-oriented investors seeking capital returns alongside price appreciation.
  • ONB's successful integration of the Bremer Financial Corporation acquisition has unlocked cost savings, expanded its Midwest footprint, and contributed to a record-low adjusted efficiency ratio of 46%, positioning it for continued organic growth in 2026.

Introduction

CATY and ONB represent two distinct profiles within the U.S. regional banking landscape, each navigating the same macroeconomic forces — interest rate dynamics, deposit competition, and evolving credit conditions — yet from markedly different vantage points. Cathay General Bancorp, headquartered in Los Angeles, brings a concentrated West Coast footprint and a specialized commercial banking focus, while Old National Bancorp, based in Evansville, Indiana, operates as a multi-state super-regional with a freshly expanded Midwest presence following its transformational Bremer acquisition. This stock comparison is relevant for investors weighing growth momentum against scale, profitability against diversification, and niche market expertise against broad-based regional strength. Understanding how these two institutions stack up across profitability, valuation, momentum, and risk can help market participants assess relative positioning within the competitive banking sector.

CATY Overview and Recent Performance

Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) is the holding company for Cathay Bank, one of the largest banks in the United States focused on serving Asian-American communities and businesses. Founded in 1962 and headquartered in Los Angeles, the bank operates primarily in California with additional presence in states including New York, Texas, and Washington. Its business model emphasizes commercial real estate (CRE) lending, commercial and industrial loans, and relationship-based retail banking.

In recent months, CATY shares have demonstrated robust upward momentum, trading near the upper end of their 52-week range and posting year-to-date gains of approximately 30% — placing the stock among the stronger performers in the regional banking peer group. The company's most recent quarterly results reinforced this positive trajectory, with earnings per share (EPS) of $1.37 surpassing consensus estimates, supported by a 13.1% year-over-year revenue increase to approximately $221 million. A key tailwind has been the expansion of the bank's net interest margin (NIM) — which measures the difference between interest income earned and interest paid to depositors — reaching 3.43% in early 2026, up from 3.30% for full-year 2025. Disciplined deposit cost management, steady loan growth of around 4%, and a lean efficiency ratio in the low-40% range have all contributed to improving sentiment. With a beta of 0.86, CATY exhibits slightly lower volatility than the broader market, and its net profit margin of roughly 24% remains a standout metric relative to many regional peers.

ONB Overview and Recent Performance

Old National Bancorp (ONB) is a Midwest-based super-regional bank with a history spanning nearly two centuries. Headquartered in Evansville, Indiana, the company provides commercial banking, retail banking, wealth management, and treasury services across a multi-state footprint that was significantly expanded through the May 2025 acquisition of Bremer Financial Corporation. That transaction, valued at approximately $1.4 billion, solidified ONB's position as the third-largest bank by market share in the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area and brought total consolidated assets to roughly $72 billion.

ONB shares have appreciated approximately 17–20% year-to-date, reflecting steady but less explosive momentum compared to CATY. The company's adjusted EPS of $0.61 in the first quarter of 2026 exceeded market expectations, driven by robust loan pipelines that reached record levels of $5.5 billion, disciplined expense management, and the full realization of cost savings from the Bremer integration. Management has guided toward 4–6% loan growth for 2026 and a sub-50% efficiency ratio — a target it has already surpassed, achieving a record adjusted efficiency ratio of 46%. A notable development supporting the stock's profile has been the company's increased capital return authorization, doubled to $400 million, reflecting confidence in its capital generation capabilities. ONB's NIM of 3.55–3.64% remains highly competitive, and its credit quality metrics — with 30-day-plus delinquencies at just 0.18% and net charge-offs (NCOs, meaning losses on loans that are written off as uncollectible) within manageable ranges — have reinforced investor confidence in recent weeks.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating stocks like CATY and ONB, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated gateway into algorithmic trading. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that actively trade thousands of different tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. However, only those bots demonstrating the highest suitability for current market dynamics earn a spot in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots employ a range of trading styles — from short-term momentum and swing trading to longer-duration trend following — each with distinct performance statistics, win rates, and risk profiles. The curated selection makes it easier for traders to identify bots whose strategies align with prevailing sector rotations, volatility patterns, and macroeconomic backdrops, without having to manually sift through the full library. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which bots are currently rated as best-positioned for today's market environment.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The contrast between CATY and ONB is fundamentally a study in scale versus efficiency. ONB's post-Bremer asset base of $72 billion and market capitalization of approximately $10 billion provide it with geographic diversification across the Upper Midwest, greater liquidity for institutional investors, and a broader revenue mix spanning commercial lending, wealth management, treasury services, and capital markets capabilities. CATY, by comparison, operates with roughly $24 billion in assets and a $4.2 billion market cap, focusing its resources on a more concentrated California-centered footprint and a specialized commercial lending niche.

On profitability metrics, CATY holds a clear edge: its net margin of approximately 24% and return on equity (ROE, a gauge of how efficiently a company generates profits from shareholder capital) of roughly 11.7% surpass ONB's net margin of about 19% and ROE of approximately 11.2%. CATY's efficiency ratio in the low-40% range also remains among the best in the peer group, though ONB has made substantial strides in this area, achieving a record adjusted efficiency ratio of 46% following Bremer-related cost saves. In terms of momentum, CATY's year-to-date gains of roughly 30% substantially outpace ONB's 17–20%, and CATY shares have been trading closer to their 52-week highs, suggesting stronger near-term sentiment.

Risk profiles differ as well. CATY's concentrated West Coast CRE exposure presents geographic and sector-specific risk, while ONB's broader Midwest diversification — now spanning from Indiana to Minnesota and North Dakota — spreads credit exposure more widely, though its larger loan portfolio introduces different scaling challenges. ONB's integration of acquired Bremer loans under its stricter credit framework has led to some increase in classified loan balances, a transition risk worth monitoring. Valuation-wise, CATY trades at a slightly lower trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple of approximately 12.3x versus ONB's 13.4x, suggesting the market assigns a modest premium to ONB's scale and diversification.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, relative momentum, profitability metrics, and post-earnings trajectory, Tickeron's AI analysis currently signals a modest preference for CATY over ONB in the near term. CATY's superior year-to-date returns, higher net margins, expanding NIM, and proximity to 52-week highs point to stronger trend strength and upward price consistency. ONB remains a highly competitive candidate — its scale, Bremer integration tailwinds, record efficiency levels, and robust capital return program make it a formidable proposition, particularly for investors prioritizing stability and diversification. However, on the narrower question of which stock exhibits the stronger combination of valuation, momentum, and profitability signals in the current market environment, the probabilistic edge — based on the AI's assessment of recent data — tilts toward Cathay General Bancorp. As with any analytical framework, outcomes are inherently uncertain, and relative positioning can shift with new earnings data and macroeconomic developments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CATY vs. ONB commentary
Aug 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CATY is a Buy and ONB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2026
Stock price -- (CATY: $63.37 vs. ONB: $26.52)
Brand notoriety: CATY and ONB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CATY: 42% vs. ONB: 58%
Market capitalization -- CATY: $4.23B vs. ONB: $10.14B
CATY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.23B. ONB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $10.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CATY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileONB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CATY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ONB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CATY and ONB are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CATY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ONB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CATY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ONB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CATY is a better buy in the short-term than ONB.

Price Growth

CATY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.83% price change this week, while ONB (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

CATY is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

ONB is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ONB($10.1B) has a higher market cap than CATY($4.23B). CATY has higher P/E ratio than ONB: CATY (12.40) vs ONB (11.73). CATY YTD gains are higher at: 32.789 vs. ONB (20.335). ONB has more cash in the bank: 537M vs. CATY (146M). CATY has less debt than ONB: CATY (169M) vs ONB (7.91B). ONB has higher revenues than CATY: ONB (2.82B) vs CATY (845M).
CATYONBCATY / ONB
Capitalization4.23B10.1B42%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD32.78920.335161%
P/E Ratio12.4011.73106%
Revenue845M2.82B30%
Total Cash146M537M27%
Total Debt169M7.91B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CATY vs ONB: Fundamental Ratings
CATY
ONB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2527
SMR RATING
1..100
3216
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3556
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ONB's Valuation (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CATY (64). This means that ONB’s stock grew similarly to CATY’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ONB (27). This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to ONB’s over the last 12 months.

ONB's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CATY (32). This means that ONB’s stock grew similarly to CATY’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ONB (47). This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to ONB’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ONB (56). This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to ONB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CATYONB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CATY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ONB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMV42.901.11
+2.66%
Direxion Daily 20+ Yr Trsy Bear 3X ETF
PGRI27.160.62
+2.34%
Putnam International Stock ETF
TDSB24.810.06
+0.26%
ETC Cabana Target Beta ETF
BHK9.20-0.03
-0.33%
Blackrock Core BD TR
IJJ149.85-0.57
-0.38%
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF

ONB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONB has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ONB jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONB
1D Price
Change %
ONB100%
-0.15%
FNB - ONB
90%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
ASB - ONB
90%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
FULT - ONB
89%
Closely correlated
-0.95%
ZION - ONB
88%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
CATY - ONB
87%
Closely correlated
-0.06%
More