CATY and ONB represent two distinct profiles within the U.S. regional banking landscape, each navigating the same macroeconomic forces — interest rate dynamics, deposit competition, and evolving credit conditions — yet from markedly different vantage points. Cathay General Bancorp, headquartered in Los Angeles, brings a concentrated West Coast footprint and a specialized commercial banking focus, while Old National Bancorp, based in Evansville, Indiana, operates as a multi-state super-regional with a freshly expanded Midwest presence following its transformational Bremer acquisition. This stock comparison is relevant for investors weighing growth momentum against scale, profitability against diversification, and niche market expertise against broad-based regional strength. Understanding how these two institutions stack up across profitability, valuation, momentum, and risk can help market participants assess relative positioning within the competitive banking sector.
Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) is the holding company for Cathay Bank, one of the largest banks in the United States focused on serving Asian-American communities and businesses. Founded in 1962 and headquartered in Los Angeles, the bank operates primarily in California with additional presence in states including New York, Texas, and Washington. Its business model emphasizes commercial real estate (CRE) lending, commercial and industrial loans, and relationship-based retail banking.
In recent months, CATY shares have demonstrated robust upward momentum, trading near the upper end of their 52-week range and posting year-to-date gains of approximately 30% — placing the stock among the stronger performers in the regional banking peer group. The company's most recent quarterly results reinforced this positive trajectory, with earnings per share (EPS) of $1.37 surpassing consensus estimates, supported by a 13.1% year-over-year revenue increase to approximately $221 million. A key tailwind has been the expansion of the bank's net interest margin (NIM) — which measures the difference between interest income earned and interest paid to depositors — reaching 3.43% in early 2026, up from 3.30% for full-year 2025. Disciplined deposit cost management, steady loan growth of around 4%, and a lean efficiency ratio in the low-40% range have all contributed to improving sentiment. With a beta of 0.86, CATY exhibits slightly lower volatility than the broader market, and its net profit margin of roughly 24% remains a standout metric relative to many regional peers.
Old National Bancorp (ONB) is a Midwest-based super-regional bank with a history spanning nearly two centuries. Headquartered in Evansville, Indiana, the company provides commercial banking, retail banking, wealth management, and treasury services across a multi-state footprint that was significantly expanded through the May 2025 acquisition of Bremer Financial Corporation. That transaction, valued at approximately $1.4 billion, solidified ONB's position as the third-largest bank by market share in the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area and brought total consolidated assets to roughly $72 billion.
ONB shares have appreciated approximately 17–20% year-to-date, reflecting steady but less explosive momentum compared to CATY. The company's adjusted EPS of $0.61 in the first quarter of 2026 exceeded market expectations, driven by robust loan pipelines that reached record levels of $5.5 billion, disciplined expense management, and the full realization of cost savings from the Bremer integration. Management has guided toward 4–6% loan growth for 2026 and a sub-50% efficiency ratio — a target it has already surpassed, achieving a record adjusted efficiency ratio of 46%. A notable development supporting the stock's profile has been the company's increased capital return authorization, doubled to $400 million, reflecting confidence in its capital generation capabilities. ONB's NIM of 3.55–3.64% remains highly competitive, and its credit quality metrics — with 30-day-plus delinquencies at just 0.18% and net charge-offs (NCOs, meaning losses on loans that are written off as uncollectible) within manageable ranges — have reinforced investor confidence in recent weeks.
For traders seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating stocks like CATY and ONB, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated gateway into algorithmic trading. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that actively trade thousands of different tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. However, only those bots demonstrating the highest suitability for current market dynamics earn a spot in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots employ a range of trading styles — from short-term momentum and swing trading to longer-duration trend following — each with distinct performance statistics, win rates, and risk profiles. The curated selection makes it easier for traders to identify bots whose strategies align with prevailing sector rotations, volatility patterns, and macroeconomic backdrops, without having to manually sift through the full library. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which bots are currently rated as best-positioned for today's market environment.
The contrast between CATY and ONB is fundamentally a study in scale versus efficiency. ONB's post-Bremer asset base of $72 billion and market capitalization of approximately $10 billion provide it with geographic diversification across the Upper Midwest, greater liquidity for institutional investors, and a broader revenue mix spanning commercial lending, wealth management, treasury services, and capital markets capabilities. CATY, by comparison, operates with roughly $24 billion in assets and a $4.2 billion market cap, focusing its resources on a more concentrated California-centered footprint and a specialized commercial lending niche.
On profitability metrics, CATY holds a clear edge: its net margin of approximately 24% and return on equity (ROE, a gauge of how efficiently a company generates profits from shareholder capital) of roughly 11.7% surpass ONB's net margin of about 19% and ROE of approximately 11.2%. CATY's efficiency ratio in the low-40% range also remains among the best in the peer group, though ONB has made substantial strides in this area, achieving a record adjusted efficiency ratio of 46% following Bremer-related cost saves. In terms of momentum, CATY's year-to-date gains of roughly 30% substantially outpace ONB's 17–20%, and CATY shares have been trading closer to their 52-week highs, suggesting stronger near-term sentiment.
Risk profiles differ as well. CATY's concentrated West Coast CRE exposure presents geographic and sector-specific risk, while ONB's broader Midwest diversification — now spanning from Indiana to Minnesota and North Dakota — spreads credit exposure more widely, though its larger loan portfolio introduces different scaling challenges. ONB's integration of acquired Bremer loans under its stricter credit framework has led to some increase in classified loan balances, a transition risk worth monitoring. Valuation-wise, CATY trades at a slightly lower trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple of approximately 12.3x versus ONB's 13.4x, suggesting the market assigns a modest premium to ONB's scale and diversification.
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, relative momentum, profitability metrics, and post-earnings trajectory, Tickeron's AI analysis currently signals a modest preference for CATY over ONB in the near term. CATY's superior year-to-date returns, higher net margins, expanding NIM, and proximity to 52-week highs point to stronger trend strength and upward price consistency. ONB remains a highly competitive candidate — its scale, Bremer integration tailwinds, record efficiency levels, and robust capital return program make it a formidable proposition, particularly for investors prioritizing stability and diversification. However, on the narrower question of which stock exhibits the stronger combination of valuation, momentum, and profitability signals in the current market environment, the probabilistic edge — based on the AI's assessment of recent data — tilts toward Cathay General Bancorp. As with any analytical framework, outcomes are inherently uncertain, and relative positioning can shift with new earnings data and macroeconomic developments.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CATY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileONB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CATY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ONB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CATY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.83% price change this week, while ONB (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.53%.
CATY is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.
ONB is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| CATY | ONB | CATY / ONB | |
| Capitalization | 4.23B | 10.1B | 42% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.789 | 20.335 | 161% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.40 | 11.73 | 106% |
| Revenue | 845M | 2.82B | 30% |
| Total Cash | 146M | 537M | 27% |
| Total Debt | 169M | 7.91B | 2% |
CATY | ONB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | 45 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | 16 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 56 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ONB's Valuation (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CATY (64). This means that ONB’s stock grew similarly to CATY’s over the last 12 months.
CATY's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ONB (27). This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to ONB’s over the last 12 months.
ONB's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CATY (32). This means that ONB’s stock grew similarly to CATY’s over the last 12 months.
CATY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ONB (47). This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to ONB’s over the last 12 months.
CATY's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ONB (56). This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to ONB’s over the last 12 months.
| CATY | ONB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 56% | 5 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | 5 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 60% | 5 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 64% | 5 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 62% | 5 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 66% | 8 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 60% | 5 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 64% | 5 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 60% | 5 days ago 51% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONB has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ONB jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONB | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| FNB - ONB | 90% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| ASB - ONB | 90% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| FULT - ONB | 89% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| ZION - ONB | 88% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| CATY - ONB | 87% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
More | ||||