AVAL
Price
$2.32
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.62B
36 days until earnings call
NWG
Price
$10.57
Change
-$0.17 (-1.58%)
Updated
Apr 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
29.27B
24 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AVAL vs NWG

Header iconAVAL vs NWG Comparison
Open Charts AVAL vs NWGBanner chart's image
Grupo Aval Acciones Y Valores SA
Price$2.32
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$188
Capitalization2.62B
NatWest Group
Price$10.57
Change-$0.17 (-1.58%)
Volume$31.32K
Capitalization29.27B
AVAL vs NWG Comparison Chart
Loading...
AVAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AVAL vs. NWG commentary
Apr 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AVAL is a Buy and NWG is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 09, 2025
Stock price -- (AVAL: $2.32 vs. NWG: $10.74)
Brand notoriety: AVAL and NWG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AVAL: 86% vs. NWG: 102%
Market capitalization -- AVAL: $2.62B vs. NWG: $29.27B
AVAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.62B. NWG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $29.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AVAL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNWG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AVAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NWG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWG is a better buy in the long-term than AVAL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AVAL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AVAL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NWG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NWG is a better buy in the short-term than AVAL.

Price Growth

AVAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -15.02% price change this week, while NWG (@Regional Banks) price change was -9.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -5.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

AVAL is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

NWG is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-5.71% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWG($29.3B) has a higher market cap than AVAL($2.62B). AVAL has higher P/E ratio than NWG: AVAL (12.61) vs NWG (5.44). AVAL YTD gains are higher at: 15.396 vs. NWG (9.252). AVAL has higher revenues than NWG: AVAL (15.85T) vs NWG (14.8B).
AVALNWGAVAL / NWG
Capitalization2.62B29.3B9%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.3969.252166%
P/E Ratio12.615.44232%
Revenue15.85T14.8B107,108%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A60.1B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AVAL vs NWG: Fundamental Ratings
AVAL
NWG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6785
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1005
SMR RATING
1..100
13
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5013
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AVAL's Valuation (15) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (37). This means that AVAL’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for AVAL (100). This means that NWG’s stock grew significantly faster than AVAL’s over the last 12 months.

AVAL's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (3). This means that AVAL’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as AVAL (50). This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to AVAL’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AVAL (50). This means that NWG’s stock grew somewhat faster than AVAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AVALNWG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AVAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FBLAX12.00N/A
N/A
Franklin Managed Income A
FSKAX138.70N/A
N/A
Fidelity Total Market Index
MLVPX17.41-0.20
-1.14%
MFS Low Volatility Equity R3
PSMJX9.08-0.13
-1.41%
Principal SmallCap Value II J
HFAHX12.50-0.35
-2.72%
Hartford Schroders Intl Cntrrn Val Y

AVAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AVAL has been loosely correlated with CIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AVAL jumps, then CIB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AVAL
1D Price
Change %
AVAL100%
-4.53%
CIB - AVAL
46%
Loosely correlated
-6.12%
BCH - AVAL
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.16%
BSAC - AVAL
37%
Loosely correlated
-3.13%
DB - AVAL
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.74%
NWG - AVAL
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
More

NWG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWG has been closely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NWG jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWG
1D Price
Change %
NWG100%
+0.19%
BCS - NWG
68%
Closely correlated
-2.96%
LYG - NWG
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
DB - NWG
59%
Loosely correlated
-4.74%
UBS - NWG
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
BBVA - NWG
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.37%
More