BAM
Price
$52.30
Change
+$0.78 (+1.51%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
83.41B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CNS
Price
$81.42
Change
+$0.63 (+0.78%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
4.19B
59 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs CNS

BAM vs CNS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. CNS commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and CNS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (BAM: $52.30 vs. CNS: $81.42)
Brand notoriety: BAM and CNS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 65% vs. CNS: 52%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $83.41B vs. CNS: $4.19B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $83.41B. CNS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCNS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CNS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNS is a better buy in the long-term than BAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CNS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the short-term than CNS.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.70% price change this week, while CNS (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNS is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.12% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($83.4B) has a higher market cap than CNS($4.19B). BAM has higher P/E ratio than CNS: BAM (30.06) vs CNS (25.05). CNS YTD gains are higher at: 33.329 vs. BAM (1.913). BAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.46B vs. CNS (228M). BAM has more cash in the bank: 1.1B vs. CNS (187M). CNS has less debt than BAM: CNS (134M) vs BAM (3.83B). BAM has higher revenues than CNS: BAM (4.77B) vs CNS (605M).
BAMCNSBAM / CNS
Capitalization83.4B4.19B1,992%
EBITDA3.46B228M1,517%
Gain YTD1.91333.3296%
P/E Ratio30.0625.05120%
Revenue4.77B605M789%
Total Cash1.1B187M586%
Total Debt3.83B134M2,855%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs CNS: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
CNS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3864
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9082
SMR RATING
1..100
3233
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8035
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNS's Valuation (74) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (80) in the null industry. This means that CNS’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (90) in the null industry. This means that CNS’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as CNS (33) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (47) in the null industry. This means that CNS’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAM (80) in the null industry. This means that CNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMCNS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CNS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSHG1.780.09
+5.33%
Performance Shipping
YSS9.320.12
+1.30%
York Space Systems Inc
CNQ51.400.37
+0.73%
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
TXNM57.22-0.24
-0.42%
TXNM Energy Inc
RMBI15.83-0.07
-0.44%
Richmond Mutual Bancorporation

CNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNS has been loosely correlated with CG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNS jumps, then CG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNS
1D Price
Change %
CNS100%
+0.78%
CG - CNS
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.88%
BX - CNS
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
BLK - CNS
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
BAM - CNS
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
KKR - CNS
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
More