BAP vs CFG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAP is a StrongBuy and CFG is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BAP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BAP’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CFG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BAP’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
- CFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.73% price change this week, while CFG (@Regional Banks) price change was -12.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
BAP is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.
CFG is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-3.56% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| BAP | CFG | BAP / CFG | |
| Capitalization | 13.5B | 16.6B | 81% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.224 | -16.505 | -20% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.41 | 11.39 | 91% |
| Revenue | 21.6B | 8.22B | 263% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 11.6B | - |
| Total Debt | 25.4B | 14B | 181% |
BAP | CFG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 51 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 4 | 6 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CFG's Valuation (29) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAP (81). This means that CFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAP’s over the last 12 months.
BAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (51). This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.
BAP's SMR Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (6). This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.
BAP's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (54). This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.
CFG's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BAP (49). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.
| BAP | CFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 11 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 66% | 8 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 74% |
BAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAP has been loosely correlated with IFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAP jumps, then IFS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAP | 100% | -2.26% | ||
| IFS - BAP | 47% Loosely correlated | -4.34% | ||
| SBNY - BAP | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| BSAC - BAP | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| CFG - BAP | 39% Loosely correlated | -13.06% | ||
| BCH - BAP | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
More | ||||
CFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFG has been closely correlated with ZION. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFG jumps, then ZION could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFG | 100% | -13.06% | ||
| ZION - CFG | 90% Closely correlated | -13.14% | ||
| RF - CFG | 89% Closely correlated | -10.94% | ||
| FITB - CFG | 88% Closely correlated | -10.47% | ||
| FNB - CFG | 88% Closely correlated | -11.43% | ||
| TFC - CFG | 88% Closely correlated | -10.88% | ||
More | ||||