BAP
Price
$177.87
Change
+$5.80 (+3.37%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
13.47B
33 days until earnings call
GGAL
Price
$53.87
Change
+$4.95 (+10.12%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
4.87B
39 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAP vs GGAL

Header iconBAP vs GGAL Comparison
Open Charts BAP vs GGALBanner chart's image
Credi
Price$177.87
Change+$5.80 (+3.37%)
Volume$258.25K
Capitalization13.47B
Grupo Financiero Galicia SA
Price$53.87
Change+$4.95 (+10.12%)
Volume$2.4M
Capitalization4.87B
BAP vs GGAL Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAP vs. GGAL commentary
Apr 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAP is a Hold and GGAL is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 12, 2025
Stock price -- (BAP: $177.87 vs. GGAL: $53.87)
Brand notoriety: BAP and GGAL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAP: 77% vs. GGAL: 198%
Market capitalization -- BAP: $13.47B vs. GGAL: $4.87B
BAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $13.47B. GGAL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGGAL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GGAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAP is a better buy in the long-term than GGAL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GGAL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GGAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAP is a better buy in the short-term than GGAL.

Price Growth

BAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.49% price change this week, while GGAL (@Regional Banks) price change was +11.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAP is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.

GGAL is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAP($13.5B) has a higher market cap than GGAL($4.87B). GGAL has higher P/E ratio than BAP: GGAL (58.02) vs BAP (10.41). BAP YTD gains are higher at: -2.973 vs. GGAL (-13.559). GGAL has higher revenues than BAP: GGAL (693B) vs BAP (21.6B).
BAPGGALBAP / GGAL
Capitalization13.5B4.87B277%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.973-13.55922%
P/E Ratio10.4158.0218%
Revenue21.6B693B3%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt25.4BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAP vs GGAL: Fundamental Ratings
BAP
GGAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6666
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3318
SMR RATING
1..100
31
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5554
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4792
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAP's Valuation (80) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as GGAL (85). This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to GGAL’s over the last 12 months.

GGAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BAP (33). This means that GGAL’s stock grew similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.

GGAL's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BAP (3). This means that GGAL’s stock grew similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.

GGAL's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BAP (55). This means that GGAL’s stock grew similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.

BAP's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGAL (92). This means that BAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAPGGAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSEE26.400.71
+2.78%
Rareview Systematic Equity ETF
IDE9.840.24
+2.50%
Voya Infrastructure Industrials AND Materials Fund
EQLS22.160.08
+0.38%
Simplify Market Neutral Eq Long/Shrt ETF
VBND42.83-0.02
-0.05%
Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF
VRP23.47-0.09
-0.38%
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF

GGAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGAL has been closely correlated with BMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GGAL jumps, then BMA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGAL
1D Price
Change %
GGAL100%
+10.12%
BMA - GGAL
91%
Closely correlated
+6.47%
SUPV - GGAL
90%
Closely correlated
+10.84%
BBAR - GGAL
90%
Closely correlated
+10.77%
CIB - GGAL
41%
Loosely correlated
+3.40%
SBNY - GGAL
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More