Advertisement
BBD vs BSAC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Banco Bradesco S.A. (BBD) vs. Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- BBD has outperformed BSAC in recent market activity, with stronger year-to-date gains around 15% compared to BSAC's approximately 5%.
- BBD trades at a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of about 9 versus BSAC's 13, offering better relative valuation for value-oriented investors.
- Both stocks provide attractive dividend yields above 4.5%, with BBD at roughly 5.6% and BSAC at 4.9%.
- BBD shows positive quarterly revenue and earnings per share (EPS) growth, contrasting with BSAC's recent declines.
- Low beta values (BBD 0.36, BSAC 0.29) indicate both are defensive plays with reduced volatility relative to the broader market.
- Analyst upgrades in recent weeks have boosted sentiment for BBD, positioning it favorably in stock comparisons.
Introduction
Banco Bradesco S.A. (BBD) and Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) are prominent American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) representing major regional banks from Brazil and Chile, respectively. Both operate in the Financial Services sector, focusing on retail and commercial banking amid Latin America's evolving economic landscape. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for investors seeking exposure to emerging market financials, dividend payers, or value stocks with low volatility. Traders monitoring relative performance may find insights into momentum shifts, valuation trade-offs, and sector positioning useful in the current market environment.
BBD Overview and Recent Performance
Banco Bradesco S.A. (BBD), headquartered in Osasco, Brazil, is one of the country's largest private banks, serving individuals and businesses through banking and insurance segments. It offers deposits, loans, credit cards, mutual funds, and insurance products like life and health coverage. In recent market activity, BBD shares have traded around $3.80-$3.96, reflecting stability with modest gains. Year-to-date performance stands at about 15%, supported by positive quarterly revenue growth of 6% and EPS expansion of nearly 57%. Analyst upgrades to Buy ratings and emphasis on its dividend appeal have improved sentiment, driven by resilient operations in a challenging Brazilian economy. Key metrics include a return on equity (ROE) of 13.75%, return on assets (ROA) of 1.09%, and price-to-book (P/B) ratio of 1.14.
BSAC Overview and Recent Performance
Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC), based in Santiago and a subsidiary of Spain's Banco Santander S.A., provides retail, wealth management, and corporate banking services across Chile. Its offerings include checking accounts, mortgages, consumer loans, insurance, and investment products for individuals, SMEs, and institutions. Shares have hovered near $31 in recent weeks, with year-to-date returns around 5%. Recent quarterly revenue dipped 3.2%, alongside a 1.7% EPS decline, though first-quarter earnings beat expectations. Sentiment has been steady, bolstered by an analyst upgrade to Overweight with a $40 target. Financial highlights feature a higher ROE of 22.06%, ROA of 1.51%, and P/B of 2.35, amid controlled economic pressures in Chile.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from its library of 351 bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. Only the most suitable for current market conditions—based on metrics like annualized returns, win rates, and consistency—earn a spot among the 25 trending ones. These bots deliver impressive stats, with annualized returns often ranging 50-160%, win rates of 55-70%, and profit factors between 1.5-3.3 across styles like multi-agent volatility plays, trend trading, and short-term scalping on timeframes from 5 to 60 minutes. Some target financial services, including regional banks and investment firms. Explore these for real-time signals and copy trading opportunities tailored to today's volatility.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both BBD and BSAC are regional banks with strong retail footprints, but BBD benefits from a larger market cap ($40B vs. $15B) and diversified insurance operations, while BSAC emphasizes wealth management. Growth drivers differ: BBD's positive revenue momentum contrasts BSAC's contraction. Recent performance favors BBD, with superior monthly and YTD gains amid analyst positivity. Risk profiles are similar, with low betas signaling stability, though BBD's cheaper multiples (lower P/E, P/B) appeal to value seekers versus BSAC's premium profitability. Market sentiment leans toward BBD for relative outperformance in emerging market financials.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI would currently favor BBD over BSAC, based on stronger trend consistency in recent weeks, attractive valuation metrics, robust dividend yield, and positive growth indicators like EPS expansion. While both exhibit stability and sector resilience, BBD's relative momentum and analyst support position it probabilistically better for near-term positioning in stock comparisons.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBD is a Hold and BSAC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BBD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBSAC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BBD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BSAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BBD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BSAC’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BBD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- BSAC’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
BBD (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.84% price change this week, while BSAC (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
BBD is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
BSAC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.15% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| BBD | BSAC | BBD / BSAC | |
| Capitalization | 34.4B | 14.2B | 242% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.600 | 2.001 | 180% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.27 | 12.84 | 64% |
| Revenue | 121B | 2.86T | 4% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 466B | 11.1T | 4% |
BBD | BSAC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BBD's Valuation (49) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BSAC (83) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BBD’s stock grew somewhat faster than BSAC’s over the last 12 months.
BSAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BBD (72) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BSAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BBD’s over the last 12 months.
BSAC's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BBD (1) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BSAC’s stock grew similarly to BBD’s over the last 12 months.
BSAC's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BBD (61) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BSAC’s stock grew similarly to BBD’s over the last 12 months.
BSAC's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BBD (60) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BSAC’s stock grew similarly to BBD’s over the last 12 months.
| BBD | BSAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 68% | 9 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 46% |
Advertisement
BBD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBD has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBD jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBD | 100% | -2.28% | ||
| ITUB - BBD | 82% Closely correlated | -2.66% | ||
| BSBR - BBD | 78% Closely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| INTR - BBD | 70% Closely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| BBDO - BBD | 66% Closely correlated | -2.56% | ||
| BSAC - BBD | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
More | ||||
BSAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSAC has been closely correlated with BCH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BSAC jumps, then BCH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BSAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSAC | 100% | -1.02% | ||
| BCH - BSAC | 84% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| BBD - BSAC | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| ITUB - BSAC | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.66% | ||
| BSBR - BSAC | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| CIB - BSAC | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||