BBD
Price
$3.61
Change
-$0.04 (-1.10%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
36.02B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NU
Price
$13.67
Change
-$0.09 (-0.65%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
66.03B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBD vs NU

BBD vs NU Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBD vs. NU commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBD is a Buy and NU is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (BBD: $3.61 vs. NU: $13.67)
Brand notoriety: BBD: Notable vs. NU: Not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBD: 88% vs. NU: 201%
Market capitalization -- BBD: $36.02B vs. NU: $66.03B
BBD [@Regional Banks] is valued at $36.02B. NU’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $66.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BBD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BBD is a better buy in the long-term than NU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NU’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NU is a better buy in the short-term than BBD.

Price Growth

BBD (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.16% price change this week, while NU (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

BBD is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

NU is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NU($66B) has a higher market cap than BBD($36B). NU has higher P/E ratio than BBD: NU (21.09) vs BBD (8.91). BBD YTD gains are higher at: 11.411 vs. NU (-18.339). BBD has higher revenues than NU: BBD (121B) vs NU (11.9B).
BBDNUBBD / NU
Capitalization36B66B55%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.411-18.339-62%
P/E Ratio8.9121.0942%
Revenue121B11.9B1,017%
Total CashN/A1.21B-
Total DebtN/A1.92B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBD: Fundamental Ratings
BBD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
17
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
93
SMR RATING
1..100
3
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBDNU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BBD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INTS4.920.14
+2.93%
Intensity Therapeutics Inc.
HUMA0.69N/A
-0.36%
Humacyte
VIK98.19-0.95
-0.96%
Viking Holdings Ltd
ELF75.10-1.65
-2.15%
elf Beauty
SLDB9.72-0.70
-6.72%
Solid Biosciences

BBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBD has been closely correlated with BSBR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBD jumps, then BSBR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBD
1D Price
Change %
BBD100%
-1.10%
BSBR - BBD
82%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
INTR - BBD
71%
Closely correlated
-2.92%
BBDO - BBD
68%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
BSAC - BBD
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
BCH - BBD
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.33%
More

NU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NU has been loosely correlated with BBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NU jumps, then BBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NU
1D Price
Change %
NU100%
-0.65%
BBD - NU
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
BSBR - NU
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
INTR - NU
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.92%
ITUB - NU
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
BSAC - NU
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
More