BBD
Price
$2.58Alerts
Change
+$0.01 (+0.39%)
Updated
Nov 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
26.9B
91 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NU
Price
$12.34Alerts
Change
+$0.26 (+2.15%)
Updated
Nov 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
58.11B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBD vs NU

BBD vs NU Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 20, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Banco Bradesco (BBD) vs. Nu Holdings (NU) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • BBD is a legacy Brazilian universal bank executing a multi-quarter earnings recovery, while NU is a high-growth digital banking platform scaling across Latin America and into the U.S.
  • BBD trades at a value-oriented valuation with a substantial dividend yield, whereas NU commands a premium multiple reflecting its faster growth.
  • BBD posted an eighth consecutive quarter of improving profitability, with ROAE (return on average equity) reaching 15.2%; NU delivered record 2025 results with roughly $2.9 billion in net income.
  • Sentiment on BBD has firmed on improving capital generation, while NU shares have shown more volatility following a strong 2025 run and U.S. expansion headlines.
  • The two names carry different risk profiles: BBD is sensitive to Brazil's macro and credit cycle, while NU faces execution and regulatory risk tied to its U.S. push and AI-driven underwriting.

Introduction

Investors weighing Latin American financials often arrive at the same question: whether to favor an established, turnaround-oriented incumbent or a fast-growing digital disruptor. This stock comparison between Banco Bradesco and Nu Holdings captures that tension. BBD represents a traditional Brazilian bank working through a structural recovery, while NU embodies the asset-light, technology-first banking model that has reshaped the region. Their contrasting business models, growth drivers, and risk exposures make this a relevant comparison for both income-oriented investors and growth-focused traders assessing relative performance and market positioning in the current environment.

BBD Overview and Recent Performance

Banco Bradesco S.A. (BBD) is one of Brazil's largest financial institutions, offering banking, insurance, and wealth-management services across retail, corporate, and SME segments. In recent quarters, the bank has been executing a well-documented turnaround. It reported its eighth consecutive quarter of improving profitability, with recurring net income rising about 20.6% year over year and ROAE (return on average equity) reaching 15.2% — a level that now exceeds its cost of capital. Net interest income (NII), the spread between what a bank earns on loans and pays on deposits, has expanded alongside disciplined credit growth.

Despite this operational progress, market reaction has been mixed. Higher loan-loss provisions and a slightly softer earnings-per-share figure tempered investor enthusiasm in recent weeks, even as sell-side analysts highlighted improving capital generation and upgraded their views. BBD continues to trade at a comparatively low valuation with a meaningful dividend yield, which has kept it on the radar of value and income-focused investors monitoring Brazil's interest-rate and credit environment.

NU Overview and Recent Performance

Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU), widely known as Nubank, is one of the world's largest digital financial-services platforms, serving more than 130 million customers across Brazil, Mexico, and Colombia. Its growth has been defined by rapid customer acquisition, low operating costs, and deepening monetization through credit, payments, and deposits. The company reported record full-year 2025 results, with revenue growth around 39% year over year on a currency-neutral basis in the third quarter and net income of roughly $2.9 billion for the year.

Recent market activity, however, has been more volatile. After a strong 2025 rally, shares pulled back following the company's record results and news of a conditional U.S. national bank charter from the OCC (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency). Investors are weighing the potential of a U.S. expansion and AI-first underwriting against elevated execution and regulatory risk. NU trades at a premium P/E (price-to-earnings) multiple, reflecting expectations that its profitability will keep compounding.

Trending AI Robots

For traders who prefer a systematic approach to navigating comparisons like this, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively monitor thousands of tickers, but only the most suitable for current market conditions earn a place in this curated section. These bots vary widely in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance, and the set of tickers they trade — from short-term momentum approaches to longer-horizon trend strategies. Exploring the Trending AI Robots can help investors see how automation is being applied to relative-strength and rotation decisions across the market.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The core contrast between these two stocks is structural. BBD operates a traditional, branch-based model with diversified revenue from lending, insurance, and fees. Its investment case rests on cost control, improving asset quality, and a return to sustainable profitability. In contrast, NU runs an asset-light digital platform whose value depends on customer growth, engagement, and rising revenue per user across multiple geographies.

Growth drivers differ sharply. BBD benefits from credit-portfolio expansion and efficiency gains, but its trajectory is closely tied to Brazil's macroeconomic and interest-rate cycle. NU benefits from structural digitization of banking in emerging markets and the optionality of U.S. and AI initiatives. On valuation, BBD screens as a value and yield play, while NU screens as a growth-at-a-premium story. Risk factors also diverge: credit costs and macro sensitivity for BBD versus regulatory and execution risk for NU. This trade-off defines their respective market positioning.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, relative stability, and catalyst profiles, Tickeron's AI would likely favor NU for its stronger, more persistent trend and structural growth momentum, though its premium valuation and recent volatility introduce downside risk. BBD presents a steadier, value-oriented setup supported by improving fundamentals and yield, but its catalyst path remains more dependent on Brazil's macro conditions. In probabilistic terms, the AI framework appears more inclined toward NU on growth and trend strength, while recognizing that BBD offers a more defensive risk-reward profile for investors prioritizing stability and income.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BBD vs. NU commentary
Nov 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBD is a Hold and NU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for BBD with price predictions
Nov 10, 2026

BBD's Stochastic Oscillator is sitting in oversold zone for 11 days

The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an uptrend is expected.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for BBD's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Following a +4.78% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BBD advanced for three days, in 194 of 279 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.

BBD may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 19, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on BBD as a result. In 54 of 84 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 64%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for BBD turned negative on October 19, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 42 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 28 of the 42 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 67%.

BBD moved below its 50-day moving average on October 26, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for BBD crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 10 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 71%.

The 50-day moving average for BBD moved below the 200-day moving average on October 28, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where BBD declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.

The Aroon Indicator for BBD entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 1 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 21 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: BBD's P/B Ratio (0.148) is slightly lower than the industry average of (1.262). P/E Ratio (1.160) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.480). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.623) is also within normal values, averaging (1.194). Dividend Yield (0.005) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. BBD's P/S Ratio (1.539) is slightly lower than the industry average of (3.740).

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 81 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. BBD’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 90 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. BBD’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock worse than average.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for NU with price predictions
Nov 10, 2026

NU sees its Stochastic Oscillator recovers from oversold territory

On November 09, 2026, the Stochastic Oscillator for NU moved out of oversold territory and this could be a bullish sign for the stock. Traders may want to buy the stock or buy call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 60 instances where the indicator left the oversold zone. In 50 of the 60 cases the stock moved higher in the following days. This puts the odds of a move higher at over 83%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where NU's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 22 of 28 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.

Following a +5.28% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NU advanced for three days, in 236 of 306 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.

NU may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 19, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on NU as a result. In 54 of 79 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 68%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for NU turned negative on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 42 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 26 of the 42 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 62%.

NU moved below its 50-day moving average on October 26, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for NU crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 27, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 13 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NU declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.

The Aroon Indicator for NU entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 5 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 73 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. NU’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 94 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: NU's P/B Ratio (4.386) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (1.262). P/E Ratio (16.172) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.480). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.563) is also within normal values, averaging (1.194). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.149) is also within normal values, averaging (3.740).

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. NU’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock worse than average.

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBD: Fundamental Ratings
BBD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
52
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBDNU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 12, 2026
Stock price -- (BBD: $2.57 vs. NU: $12.08)
Brand notoriety: BBD: Notable vs. NU: Not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBD: 79% vs. NU: 69%
Market capitalization -- BBD: $26.9B vs. NU: $58.11B
BBD [@Regional Banks] is valued at $26.9B. NU’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $58.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $147.87 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while NU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BBD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BBD is a better buy in the long-term than NU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • NU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NU is a better buy in the short-term than BBD.

Price Growth

BBD (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.17% price change this week, while NU (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

BBD is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2027.

NU is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.23% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBD has been closely correlated with BBDO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBD jumps, then BBDO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBD
1D Price
Change %
BBD100%
-2.28%
BBDO - BBD
85%
Closely correlated
-2.87%
BSBR - BBD
75%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
NU - BBD
73%
Closely correlated
-2.27%
INTR - BBD
70%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
ITUB - BBD
66%
Closely correlated
-2.25%
More

NU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NU has been closely correlated with BBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NU jumps, then BBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NU
1D Price
Change %
NU100%
-2.27%
BBD - NU
72%
Closely correlated
-2.28%
BBDO - NU
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.87%
BSBR - NU
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
BMA - NU
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
BSAC - NU
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBCF34.07-0.05
-0.15%
Seacoast Banking Corp
IFF83.17-1.26
-1.49%
International Flavors & Fragrances
QFIN5.37-0.24
-4.28%
Qfin Holdings Inc
PLCE0.18-0.01
-4.70%
Children's Place
SCNX3.04-0.16
-5.00%
Scienture Holdings Inc.