It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BBVA’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUBS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BBVA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BBVA (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.57% price change this week, while UBS (@Major Banks) price change was +0.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.44%.
BBVA is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
UBS is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
BBVA | UBS | BBVA / UBS | |
Capitalization | 69B | 98.7B | 70% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 13.851 | 5.422 | 255% |
P/E Ratio | 8.43 | 3.61 | 234% |
Revenue | 33.4B | 39.4B | 85% |
Total Cash | N/A | 144B | - |
Total Debt | 74.2B | 378B | 20% |
BBVA | UBS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 93 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 2 | 5 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BBVA's Valuation (27) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (53). This means that BBVA’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.
UBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BBVA (11). This means that UBS’s stock grew similarly to BBVA’s over the last 12 months.
BBVA's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (5). This means that BBVA’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.
UBS's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BBVA (56). This means that UBS’s stock grew similarly to BBVA’s over the last 12 months.
UBS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BBVA (80). This means that UBS’s stock grew significantly faster than BBVA’s over the last 12 months.
BBVA | UBS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago67% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago55% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago62% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago53% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 15 days ago59% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago57% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago82% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago49% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBVA has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBVA jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BBVA | 100% | -0.51% | ||
SAN - BBVA | 73% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
NWG - BBVA | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
ING - BBVA | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
BCS - BBVA | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
CMWAY - BBVA | 38% Loosely correlated | +3.31% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBS has been loosely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UBS jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.