BCBP
Price
$9.16
Change
-$0.63 (-6.44%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
159.05M
71 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WSFS
Price
$81.94
Change
+$0.39 (+0.48%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.21B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCBP vs WSFS

BCBP vs WSFS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCBP vs. WSFS commentary
Aug 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCBP is a Buy and WSFS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 05, 2026
Stock price -- (BCBP: $9.16 vs. WSFS: $81.94)
Brand notoriety: BCBP and WSFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCBP: 138% vs. WSFS: 37%
Market capitalization -- BCBP: $159.05M vs. WSFS: $4.21B
BCBP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $159.05M. WSFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWSFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WSFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WSFS is a better buy in the long-term than BCBP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCBP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCBP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WSFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WSFS is a better buy in the short-term than BCBP.

Price Growth

BCBP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -14.55% price change this week, while WSFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCBP is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

WSFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.89% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WSFS($4.21B) has a higher market cap than BCBP($159M). BCBP has higher P/E ratio than WSFS: BCBP (131.58) vs WSFS (13.75). WSFS YTD gains are higher at: 49.128 vs. BCBP (15.510). WSFS has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. BCBP (13.8M). BCBP has less debt than WSFS: BCBP (280M) vs WSFS (310M). WSFS has higher revenues than BCBP: WSFS (1.09B) vs BCBP (103M).
BCBPWSFSBCBP / WSFS
Capitalization159M4.21B4%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.51049.12832%
P/E Ratio131.5813.75957%
Revenue103M1.09B9%
Total Cash13.8M1.69B1%
Total Debt280M310M90%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCBP vs WSFS: Fundamental Ratings
BCBP
WSFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5533
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10031
SMR RATING
1..100
9032
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
235
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCBP's Valuation (38) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WSFS (72) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BCBP’s stock grew somewhat faster than WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BCBP (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew significantly faster than BCBP’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's SMR Rating (32) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCBP (90) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCBP’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BCBP (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to BCBP’s over the last 12 months.

BCBP's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WSFS (35) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BCBP’s stock grew somewhat faster than WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCBPWSFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCBP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WSFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BEG38.953.16
+8.83%
Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF
FELC43.830.69
+1.60%
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
TDSC28.080.37
+1.33%
ETC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
ILOW47.070.41
+0.88%
AB Active ETFs Inc.
VGM10.190.06
+0.59%
Invesco Trust Investment Grade Municipals

WSFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WSFS has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WSFS jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WSFS
1D Price
Change %
WSFS100%
+0.48%
UCB - WSFS
85%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
UBSI - WSFS
85%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
FFBC - WSFS
83%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
STBA - WSFS
82%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
FCF - WSFS
82%
Closely correlated
+0.97%
More