BCEKF
Price
$0.31
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
35 days until earnings call
FNV
Price
$127.18
Change
+$1.77 (+1.41%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
19 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BCEKF vs FNV

Header iconBCEKF vs FNV Comparison
Open Charts BCEKF vs FNVBanner chart's image
Bear Creek Mining
Price$0.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200.59K
CapitalizationN/A
Franco-Nevada
Price$127.18
Change+$1.77 (+1.41%)
Volume$494.46K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BCEKF vs FNV Comparison Chart
Loading...
BCEKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FNV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
BCEKF vs. FNV commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCEKF is a StrongBuy and FNV is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BCEKF: $0.36 vs. FNV: $127.18)
Brand notoriety: BCEKF and FNV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCEKF: 483% vs. FNV: 82%
Market capitalization -- BCEKF: $71.1M vs. FNV: $22.83B
BCEKF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $71.1M. FNV’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $22.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCEKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFNV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCEKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FNV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNV is a better buy in the long-term than BCEKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCEKF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCEKF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FNV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BCEKF and FNV are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BCEKF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.32% price change this week, while FNV (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCEKF is expected to report earnings on Nov 22, 2024.

FNV is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.12% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNV($22.8B) has a higher market cap than BCEKF($71.1M). BCEKF YTD gains are higher at: 164.706 vs. FNV (15.831). BCEKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 95K vs. FNV (-91M). FNV has more cash in the bank: 1.42B vs. BCEKF (9.63M). BCEKF has less debt than FNV: BCEKF (40M) vs FNV (82.6M). FNV has higher revenues than BCEKF: FNV (1.22B) vs BCEKF (85.3M).
BCEKFFNVBCEKF / FNV
Capitalization71.1M22.8B0%
EBITDA95K-91M-0%
Gain YTD164.70615.8311,040%
P/E RatioN/A32.33-
Revenue85.3M1.22B7%
Total Cash9.63M1.42B1%
Total Debt40M82.6M48%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCEKF vs FNV: Fundamental Ratings
BCEKF
FNV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2213
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10049
SMR RATING
1..100
9893
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3658
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9279
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNV's Valuation (16) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCEKF (62) in the null industry. This means that FNV’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

FNV's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCEKF (100) in the null industry. This means that FNV’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

FNV's SMR Rating (93) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BCEKF (98) in the null industry. This means that FNV’s stock grew similarly to BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

BCEKF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as FNV (58) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that BCEKF’s stock grew similarly to FNV’s over the last 12 months.

FNV's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BCEKF (92) in the null industry. This means that FNV’s stock grew similarly to BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCEKFFNV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BCEKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FNV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

BCEKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCEKF has been loosely correlated with SLVRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCEKF jumps, then SLVRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCEKF
1D Price
Change %
BCEKF100%
+7.33%
SLVRF - BCEKF
47%
Loosely correlated
-6.24%
PAAS - BCEKF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
AU - BCEKF
43%
Loosely correlated
+5.43%
FNV - BCEKF
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
ISVLF - BCEKF
41%
Loosely correlated
+3.71%
More

FNV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNV has been closely correlated with NEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNV jumps, then NEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNV
1D Price
Change %
FNV100%
+1.41%
NEM - FNV
76%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
AEM - FNV
74%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
BVN - FNV
70%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
RGLD - FNV
69%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
CDE - FNV
69%
Closely correlated
-0.77%
More