BCLYF
Price
$3.45
Change
+$0.19 (+5.83%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
WFC
Price
$68.77
Change
-$2.04 (-2.88%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
27 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BCLYF vs WFC

Header iconBCLYF vs WFC Comparison
Open Charts BCLYF vs WFCBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$3.45
Change+$0.19 (+5.83%)
Volume$7.59K
CapitalizationN/A
Wells Fargo & Co
Price$68.77
Change-$2.04 (-2.88%)
Volume$381.94K
CapitalizationN/A
BCLYF vs WFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BCLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCLYF vs. WFC commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLYF is a Hold and WFC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BCLYF: $3.45 vs. WFC: $68.76)
Brand notoriety: BCLYF: Not notable vs. WFC: Notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCLYF: 18% vs. WFC: 118%
Market capitalization -- BCLYF: $30.97B vs. WFC: $203.96B
BCLYF [@Major Banks] is valued at $30.97B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $203.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCLYF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCLYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCLYF is a better buy in the long-term than WFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCLYF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCLYF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WFC is a better buy in the short-term than BCLYF.

Price Growth

BCLYF (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.32% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was -3.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

WFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-2.12% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFC($204B) has a higher market cap than BCLYF($31B). WFC has higher P/E ratio than BCLYF: WFC (11.93) vs BCLYF (4.22). BCLYF YTD gains are higher at: 67.523 vs. WFC (43.392). BCLYF has less debt than WFC: BCLYF (116B) vs WFC (219B). WFC has higher revenues than BCLYF: WFC (82.6B) vs BCLYF (25.3B).
BCLYFWFCBCLYF / WFC
Capitalization31B204B15%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD67.52343.392156%
P/E Ratio4.2211.9335%
Revenue25.3B82.6B31%
Total CashN/A33B-
Total Debt116B219B53%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCLYF vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
BCLYF
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
670
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4340
SMR RATING
1..100
42
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2720
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCLYF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WFC (79) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCLYF’s stock grew significantly faster than WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (43) in the null industry. This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (4) in the null industry. This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (41) in the null industry. This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (27) in the null industry. This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCLYFWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BCLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KHC31.250.28
+0.90%
Kraft Heinz Company (The)
PHR24.86-0.78
-3.04%
Phreesia
RDN31.73-1.34
-4.05%
Radian Group
VZLA1.77-0.09
-4.84%
Vizsla Silver Corp
GENK7.21-0.69
-8.73%
GEN Restaurant Group

BCLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCLYF has been loosely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCLYF jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCLYF
1D Price
Change %
BCLYF100%
-1.81%
BCS - BCLYF
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.49%
SAN - BCLYF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.30%
ING - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
AAVMY - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
WFC - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.63%
More

WFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFC
1D Price
Change %
WFC100%
-2.90%
BAC - WFC
78%
Closely correlated
-3.44%
C - WFC
73%
Closely correlated
-4.22%
JPM - WFC
72%
Closely correlated
-3.35%
EWBC - WFC
67%
Closely correlated
-5.07%
BMO - WFC
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.49%
More