Regional banks occupy a unique position in the financial ecosystem — large enough to offer comprehensive services yet grounded enough to maintain deep ties to the communities they serve. BFC (Bank First Corporation) and UVSP (Univest Financial Corporation) represent two such institutions, each with over a century of operating history. This comparison is designed for investors and traders evaluating regional bank stocks in the current market environment, where interest rate dynamics, credit quality trends, and merger-and-acquisition (M&A) activity are reshaping the competitive landscape. By examining these two stocks side by side, readers can better assess which may align with their investment objectives — whether they prioritize value, growth momentum, dividend income, or relative stability.
BFC, headquartered in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, is the holding company for Bank First, N.A., a community-focused financial institution founded in 1894. The bank operates 38 branches across Wisconsin and Illinois and manages approximately $6 billion in total assets. Bank First's business model centers on relationship-based commercial and retail banking, with its loan portfolio heavily weighted toward real estate lending, which comprised roughly 74% of total loans at year-end 2025.
In recent months, BFC has garnered significant market attention following the completion of its acquisition of Centre 1 Bancorp, the parent company of First National Bank and Trust Company (FNBT), on January 1, 2026. CEO Mike Molepske described this as "the most transformational event in Bank First's 131-year history," noting it was more than twice the size of any previous merger. The deal expanded Bank First into Walworth, Rock, and Green Counties in Wisconsin, and into Winnebago County in Illinois, while also adding trust and wealth management capabilities. For the full year 2025, BFC reported adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of $7.42, reflecting year-over-year growth exceeding 15%. The bank's Q1 2026 revenue reached $84.3 million, up 39.4% from the same quarter a year earlier, reflecting the impact of the FNBT integration. Stock performance has been robust: BFC gained approximately 25.5% year-to-date through late July 2026 and roughly 24.6% over the trailing twelve months, supported by a low beta of 0.41, indicating relatively low volatility compared to the broader market.
UVSP, based in Souderton, Pennsylvania, is the parent company of Univest Bank and Trust Co., founded in 1876. With approximately $8.4 billion in assets and $5.9 billion in assets under management and supervision (AUM) through its wealth management division, Univest operates a more diversified business model across three segments: Banking, Wealth Management, and Insurance. The bank serves individuals, businesses, municipalities, and nonprofit organizations through a network of more than 50 offices primarily in the Mid-Atlantic region.
Recent performance has been notably strong for UVSP. The company reported net income of $90.8 million for the full year 2025, translating to diluted EPS of $3.13 — a significant increase from $2.58 in 2024. Net interest margin (NIM) on a tax-equivalent basis stood at 3.10% in Q4 2025, or 3.37% excluding the impact of excess liquidity, reflecting disciplined asset-liability management. Univest's Q3 2025 results notably beat consensus EPS estimates by approximately 17%, driven by a 15.3% year-over-year increase in net interest income (NII, the difference between interest earned on loans and interest paid on deposits). The stock has delivered impressive returns: UVSP has appreciated roughly 36.5% year-to-date through late July 2026, outpacing BFC and the broader regional bank sector. With a beta of 0.65, it carries moderately more volatility than BFC but remains below the market average. The company also boasts 47 consecutive years of uninterrupted dividend payments, underscoring its commitment to shareholder returns.
For investors seeking a data-driven edge in comparing stocks like BFC and UVSP, Tickeron offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots through its Trending AI Robots page. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest adaptability to current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. These bots employ diverse trading styles — from short-term swing trading to longer-term trend-following strategies — and each comes with its own track record of performance statistics, including win rates, trade frequency, and historical returns. Some bots in the Trending section have demonstrated annualized returns in the range of 20% to 70% or more, depending on strategy and market regime. By exploring the Trending AI Robots page, traders can evaluate which automated strategies currently align with stocks like BFC or UVSP and make more informed decisions grounded in quantitative analysis.
When comparing BFC and UVSP directly, several contrasts emerge that may guide investor preference. On valuation, UVSP appears considerably cheaper: its P/E ratio of approximately 12.9 sits well below BFC's roughly 19.6, and UVSP's price-to-sales ratio is also more compressed. That said, BFC's premium may partly reflect optimism around the recently closed FNBT acquisition and the earnings accretion (an increase in per-share earnings resulting from a merger) it is expected to deliver. On a fundamental rating scale where lower numbers are more favorable, Tickeron assigns UVSP a Valuation Rating of 49 (fairly valued) versus BFC's 90 (overvalued), pointing to a clear advantage for UVSP on value metrics.
From a momentum and technical perspective, the picture shifts. BFC displays stronger near-term technical signals, with 6 bullish indicators versus 3 bearish, while UVSP shows 3 bullish against 4 bearish indicators. BFC also earns a superior Profit vs. Risk Rating of 12 compared to UVSP's 31, suggesting more consistent risk-adjusted returns. On the business model front, UVSP's three-segment structure — banking, wealth management, and insurance — provides revenue diversification that BFC's predominantly lending-focused model lacks, though BFC's newly acquired trust and wealth management capabilities via the FNBT deal may narrow this gap over time. UVSP also generates significantly higher total revenue (approximately $330 million trailing twelve months versus BFC's roughly $217 million) and maintains a larger asset base, yet BFC has delivered stronger earnings per share growth on a percentage basis in recent quarters. Both banks operate with conservative risk profiles, but UVSP's higher beta and larger trading volume suggest it may be more responsive to sector-wide sentiment shifts, while BFC's lower beta has historically offered a smoother ride.
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, technical positioning, and relative stability, Tickeron's AI analysis currently appears to lean toward BFC as the more favored candidate between the two. The AI-driven assessment — which classified BFC as a "Buy" and UVSP as a "Hold" in its most recent evaluation — reflects the stronger bullish technical indicator alignment for BFC, its superior Profit vs. Risk Rating, and the potential earnings uplift from the recently completed FNBT acquisition. While UVSP holds clear advantages in valuation, dividend yield, and recent YTD price momentum, the AI appears to weight trend stability and momentum consistency more heavily in its probabilistic framework. That said, this assessment is not a definitive prediction; the relative attractiveness of either stock may shift as new earnings data emerges, merger synergies materialize, and macroeconomic conditions — particularly the interest rate trajectory — evolve. Both banks remain fundamentally sound institutions with long operating histories and disciplined management teams.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BFC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUVSP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UVSP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.99% price change this week, while UVSP (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.87%.
BFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.
UVSP is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| BFC | UVSP | BFC / UVSP | |
| Capitalization | 1.74B | 1.19B | 147% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.683 | 34.142 | 90% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.40 | 12.44 | 164% |
| Revenue | 191M | 336M | 57% |
| Total Cash | 64.4M | 69.6M | 93% |
| Total Debt | 125M | 302M | 41% |
BFC | UVSP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 29 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UVSP's Valuation (44) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFC (92). This means that UVSP’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFC’s over the last 12 months.
BFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UVSP (29). This means that BFC’s stock grew similarly to UVSP’s over the last 12 months.
UVSP's SMR Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BFC (59). This means that UVSP’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.
UVSP's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BFC (46). This means that UVSP’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.
BFC's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UVSP (36). This means that BFC’s stock grew similarly to UVSP’s over the last 12 months.
| BFC | UVSP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 44% | 11 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 62% | 5 days ago 72% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JCE | 17.27 | 0.03 | +0.17% |
| Nuveen Core Equity Alpha Fund | |||
| NBTR | 49.26 | N/A | N/A |
| Neuberger Berman Total Return Bond ETF | |||
| FJUN | 61.50 | -0.02 | -0.03% |
| FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Jun | |||
| MILK | 24.17 | -0.09 | -0.37% |
| Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF | |||
| BIB | 106.87 | -0.72 | -0.67% |
| ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFC has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFC jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFC | 100% | -0.27% | ||
| PEBO - BFC | 77% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| IBCP - BFC | 77% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| CTBI - BFC | 76% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| BY - BFC | 76% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| UVSP - BFC | 75% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UVSP has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UVSP jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UVSP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UVSP | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| FMBH - UVSP | 87% Closely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| BY - UVSP | 86% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| UBSI - UVSP | 85% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| THFF - UVSP | 85% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| EFSC - UVSP | 85% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
More | ||||