BFC
Price
$156.88
Change
-$1.12 (-0.71%)
Updated
Aug 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.74B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UVSP
Price
$43.06
Change
-$0.10 (-0.23%)
Updated
Aug 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.19B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFC vs UVSP

BFC vs UVSP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 30, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Bank First Corporation (BFC) vs. Univest Financial Corporation (UVSP) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Bank First Corporation (BFC) and Univest Financial Corporation (UVSP) are both well-established regional bank holding companies, but they operate in different geographic markets — BFC in Wisconsin and Illinois, UVSP in the Mid-Atlantic region.
  • UVSP currently trades at a significantly lower valuation multiple, with a P/E ratio (price-to-earnings ratio, which measures how much investors pay per dollar of earnings) of roughly 12.9 compared to BFC's approximately 19.6, suggesting UVSP may offer more value on an earnings basis.
  • BFC has demonstrated stronger recent technical momentum, with 6 bullish technical indicators versus UVSP's 3, according to Tickeron's analysis, and benefits from a recently completed transformational acquisition.
  • UVSP offers a higher dividend yield of approximately 2.06% compared to BFC's roughly 1.38%, and has delivered superior year-to-date price appreciation of approximately 36.5% versus BFC's 25.6%.
  • Both banks have reported solid earnings growth, but UVSP's more diversified business model — spanning banking, wealth management, and insurance — provides a different risk profile compared to BFC's community-banking-focused strategy.
  • Analyst consensus leans more favorably toward BFC with a "Buy" rating and a price target implying roughly 7% upside, while UVSP carries a "Hold" consensus with a more modest implied upside near 1.6%.

Introduction

Regional banks occupy a unique position in the financial ecosystem — large enough to offer comprehensive services yet grounded enough to maintain deep ties to the communities they serve. BFC (Bank First Corporation) and UVSP (Univest Financial Corporation) represent two such institutions, each with over a century of operating history. This comparison is designed for investors and traders evaluating regional bank stocks in the current market environment, where interest rate dynamics, credit quality trends, and merger-and-acquisition (M&A) activity are reshaping the competitive landscape. By examining these two stocks side by side, readers can better assess which may align with their investment objectives — whether they prioritize value, growth momentum, dividend income, or relative stability.

BFC Overview and Recent Performance

BFC, headquartered in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, is the holding company for Bank First, N.A., a community-focused financial institution founded in 1894. The bank operates 38 branches across Wisconsin and Illinois and manages approximately $6 billion in total assets. Bank First's business model centers on relationship-based commercial and retail banking, with its loan portfolio heavily weighted toward real estate lending, which comprised roughly 74% of total loans at year-end 2025.

In recent months, BFC has garnered significant market attention following the completion of its acquisition of Centre 1 Bancorp, the parent company of First National Bank and Trust Company (FNBT), on January 1, 2026. CEO Mike Molepske described this as "the most transformational event in Bank First's 131-year history," noting it was more than twice the size of any previous merger. The deal expanded Bank First into Walworth, Rock, and Green Counties in Wisconsin, and into Winnebago County in Illinois, while also adding trust and wealth management capabilities. For the full year 2025, BFC reported adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of $7.42, reflecting year-over-year growth exceeding 15%. The bank's Q1 2026 revenue reached $84.3 million, up 39.4% from the same quarter a year earlier, reflecting the impact of the FNBT integration. Stock performance has been robust: BFC gained approximately 25.5% year-to-date through late July 2026 and roughly 24.6% over the trailing twelve months, supported by a low beta of 0.41, indicating relatively low volatility compared to the broader market.

UVSP Overview and Recent Performance

UVSP, based in Souderton, Pennsylvania, is the parent company of Univest Bank and Trust Co., founded in 1876. With approximately $8.4 billion in assets and $5.9 billion in assets under management and supervision (AUM) through its wealth management division, Univest operates a more diversified business model across three segments: Banking, Wealth Management, and Insurance. The bank serves individuals, businesses, municipalities, and nonprofit organizations through a network of more than 50 offices primarily in the Mid-Atlantic region.

Recent performance has been notably strong for UVSP. The company reported net income of $90.8 million for the full year 2025, translating to diluted EPS of $3.13 — a significant increase from $2.58 in 2024. Net interest margin (NIM) on a tax-equivalent basis stood at 3.10% in Q4 2025, or 3.37% excluding the impact of excess liquidity, reflecting disciplined asset-liability management. Univest's Q3 2025 results notably beat consensus EPS estimates by approximately 17%, driven by a 15.3% year-over-year increase in net interest income (NII, the difference between interest earned on loans and interest paid on deposits). The stock has delivered impressive returns: UVSP has appreciated roughly 36.5% year-to-date through late July 2026, outpacing BFC and the broader regional bank sector. With a beta of 0.65, it carries moderately more volatility than BFC but remains below the market average. The company also boasts 47 consecutive years of uninterrupted dividend payments, underscoring its commitment to shareholder returns.

Trending AI Robots

For investors seeking a data-driven edge in comparing stocks like BFC and UVSP, Tickeron offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots through its Trending AI Robots page. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest adaptability to current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. These bots employ diverse trading styles — from short-term swing trading to longer-term trend-following strategies — and each comes with its own track record of performance statistics, including win rates, trade frequency, and historical returns. Some bots in the Trending section have demonstrated annualized returns in the range of 20% to 70% or more, depending on strategy and market regime. By exploring the Trending AI Robots page, traders can evaluate which automated strategies currently align with stocks like BFC or UVSP and make more informed decisions grounded in quantitative analysis.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When comparing BFC and UVSP directly, several contrasts emerge that may guide investor preference. On valuation, UVSP appears considerably cheaper: its P/E ratio of approximately 12.9 sits well below BFC's roughly 19.6, and UVSP's price-to-sales ratio is also more compressed. That said, BFC's premium may partly reflect optimism around the recently closed FNBT acquisition and the earnings accretion (an increase in per-share earnings resulting from a merger) it is expected to deliver. On a fundamental rating scale where lower numbers are more favorable, Tickeron assigns UVSP a Valuation Rating of 49 (fairly valued) versus BFC's 90 (overvalued), pointing to a clear advantage for UVSP on value metrics.

From a momentum and technical perspective, the picture shifts. BFC displays stronger near-term technical signals, with 6 bullish indicators versus 3 bearish, while UVSP shows 3 bullish against 4 bearish indicators. BFC also earns a superior Profit vs. Risk Rating of 12 compared to UVSP's 31, suggesting more consistent risk-adjusted returns. On the business model front, UVSP's three-segment structure — banking, wealth management, and insurance — provides revenue diversification that BFC's predominantly lending-focused model lacks, though BFC's newly acquired trust and wealth management capabilities via the FNBT deal may narrow this gap over time. UVSP also generates significantly higher total revenue (approximately $330 million trailing twelve months versus BFC's roughly $217 million) and maintains a larger asset base, yet BFC has delivered stronger earnings per share growth on a percentage basis in recent quarters. Both banks operate with conservative risk profiles, but UVSP's higher beta and larger trading volume suggest it may be more responsive to sector-wide sentiment shifts, while BFC's lower beta has historically offered a smoother ride.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, technical positioning, and relative stability, Tickeron's AI analysis currently appears to lean toward BFC as the more favored candidate between the two. The AI-driven assessment — which classified BFC as a "Buy" and UVSP as a "Hold" in its most recent evaluation — reflects the stronger bullish technical indicator alignment for BFC, its superior Profit vs. Risk Rating, and the potential earnings uplift from the recently completed FNBT acquisition. While UVSP holds clear advantages in valuation, dividend yield, and recent YTD price momentum, the AI appears to weight trend stability and momentum consistency more heavily in its probabilistic framework. That said, this assessment is not a definitive prediction; the relative attractiveness of either stock may shift as new earnings data emerges, merger synergies materialize, and macroeconomic conditions — particularly the interest rate trajectory — evolve. Both banks remain fundamentally sound institutions with long operating histories and disciplined management teams.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BFC vs. UVSP commentary
Aug 18, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFC is a StrongBuy and UVSP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2026
Stock price -- (BFC: $158.00 vs. UVSP: $43.16)
Brand notoriety: BFC and UVSP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFC: 26% vs. UVSP: 38%
Market capitalization -- BFC: $1.75B vs. UVSP: $1.19B
BFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.75B. UVSP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUVSP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UVSP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UVSP is a better buy in the long-term than BFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UVSP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • UVSP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UVSP is a better buy in the short-term than BFC.

Price Growth

BFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.99% price change this week, while UVSP (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

UVSP is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.26% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFC($1.74B) has a higher market cap than UVSP($1.19B). BFC has higher P/E ratio than UVSP: BFC (20.40) vs UVSP (12.44). UVSP YTD gains are higher at: 34.142 vs. BFC (30.683). UVSP has more cash in the bank: 69.6M vs. BFC (64.4M). BFC has less debt than UVSP: BFC (125M) vs UVSP (302M). UVSP has higher revenues than BFC: UVSP (336M) vs BFC (191M).
BFCUVSPBFC / UVSP
Capitalization1.74B1.19B147%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD30.68334.14290%
P/E Ratio20.4012.44164%
Revenue191M336M57%
Total Cash64.4M69.6M93%
Total Debt125M302M41%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFC vs UVSP: Fundamental Ratings
BFC
UVSP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3066
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
929
SMR RATING
1..100
5952
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3436
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UVSP's Valuation (44) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFC (92). This means that UVSP’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFC’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UVSP (29). This means that BFC’s stock grew similarly to UVSP’s over the last 12 months.

UVSP's SMR Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BFC (59). This means that UVSP’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.

UVSP's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BFC (46). This means that UVSP’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UVSP (36). This means that BFC’s stock grew similarly to UVSP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFCUVSP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UVSP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JCE17.270.03
+0.17%
Nuveen Core Equity Alpha Fund
NBTR49.26N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Total Return Bond ETF
FJUN61.50-0.02
-0.03%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Jun
MILK24.17-0.09
-0.37%
Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF
BIB106.87-0.72
-0.67%
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology

BFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFC has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFC jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFC
1D Price
Change %
BFC100%
-0.27%
PEBO - BFC
77%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
IBCP - BFC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
CTBI - BFC
76%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
BY - BFC
76%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
UVSP - BFC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
More

UVSP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UVSP has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UVSP jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UVSP
1D Price
Change %
UVSP100%
+0.44%
FMBH - UVSP
87%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
BY - UVSP
86%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
UBSI - UVSP
85%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
THFF - UVSP
85%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
EFSC - UVSP
85%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
More