Bank First Corporation and Community Trust Bancorp are two well-regarded regional bank holding companies that often appeal to different segments of the investor base. BFC, headquartered in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, has built a reputation as an active consolidator within its home state. CTBI, based in Pikeville, Kentucky, operates roughly 80 branches across Kentucky, Tennessee, and West Virginia and is known for conservative balance-sheet management and dependable profitability. This stock comparison is relevant for investors weighing acquisition-fueled growth against organic, income-oriented stability, and for traders monitoring relative performance and market positioning across the regional banking sector.
BFC is the holding company for Bank First, N.A., and has used mergers to expand its footprint materially. Its acquisition of Centre 1 Bancorp closed at the start of 2026, adding roughly $1.48 billion in assets, and a further acquisition of Peoples is expected to lift total assets to approximately $7.5 billion once completed. This deal-driven scale has flowed through to results: net interest income (NII), the earnings a bank generates from lending, rose to about $55 million in the most recent quarter, while NIM expanded to 4.13%, well above the Wisconsin state average. The company has also returned capital to shareholders, authorizing a $60 million repurchase program and raising its quarterly dividend. Shares have traded near the middle of their 52-week range in recent market activity, supported by improving fundamentals and a consensus price target of roughly $163.
CTBI is a traditional community banking organization and the third-largest Kentucky-domiciled bank holding company, operating across Kentucky, Tennessee, and West Virginia. Rather than pursuing mergers, it has grown loans and deposits organically while maintaining strong efficiency. The company posted record earnings for 2025, with net income of about $98 million and earnings per share (EPS) rising 18% year over year, and it followed with record second-quarter results of $1.64 per share. Management raised the quarterly dividend by 23% to $0.65, underscoring confidence in the balance sheet. Its stock has delivered a roughly 31% year-to-date return, though it has pulled back modestly in recent weeks and trades below its 52-week high, with a forward P/E near 11.7 and a dividend yield above 3%.
For traders who prefer a systematic approach to stock selection, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of its AI-driven trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots that monitor thousands of tickers, but only a subset earns placement in this featured section. These bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance statistics, and ticker universes, making it possible to find approaches aligned with different risk profiles and market conditions. The curated list is refreshed to reflect bots best suited to current market dynamics, helping users filter for consistency rather than randomness. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to review the available bots and their performance.
The two companies present contrasting growth models. BFC leans on mergers to accelerate earnings, with the Centre transaction projected to be strongly accretive to EPS over 2026 and 2027, but this strategy introduces integration and execution risk and a higher valuation multiple. CTBI, by contrast, grows more slowly but carries a lower forward P/E and a richer dividend yield, appealing to income-focused investors. On profitability, BFC currently reports a higher NIM, while CTBI stands out on return on assets and efficiency. Risk profiles also differ: CTBI has seen nonperforming loans drift higher recently, though they remain low as a share of total loans, whereas BFC carries the credit and execution risks inherent to digesting new acquisitions. Sector exposure is similar—both are regional community banks sensitive to interest rates and local economic conditions.
Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor CTBI for its steadier trend, lower valuation, stronger income profile, and more consistent, organically driven earnings trajectory, while acknowledging that BFC currently shows stronger margin momentum and clearer near-term earnings catalysts from its acquisitions. A probabilistic read suggests CTBI offers a more stable relative positioning for risk-conscious investors, whereas BFC may appeal to those comfortable with integration risk in exchange for faster growth potential. The verdict reflects relative trend consistency and positioning rather than a definitive claim about future returns.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for BFC turned positive on October 26, 2026. Looking at past instances where BFC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 39 of 54 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 04, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on BFC as a result. In 69 of 105 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
BFC moved above its 50-day moving average on November 09, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +2.01% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BFC advanced for three days, in 171 of 316 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 54%.
BFC may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 33 of 61 cases where BFC's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 54%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where BFC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 45%.
The Aroon Indicator for BFC entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 8 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 30 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 32 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 47 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 48 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. BFC’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 94 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.001) is normal, around the industry mean (1.262). P/E Ratio (19.231) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.480). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.280) is also within normal values, averaging (1.194). Dividend Yield (0.016) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. BFC's P/S Ratio (7.358) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (3.740).
The RSI Oscillator for CTBI moved out of oversold territory on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 22 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 14 of the 22 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 64%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 2 days, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 10, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CTBI as a result. In 49 of 81 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CTBI just turned positive on November 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where CTBI's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 28 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
Following a +1.61% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CTBI advanced for three days, in 160 of 298 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 54%.
CTBI may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CTBI declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 50%.
The Aroon Indicator for CTBI entered a downward trend on October 30, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 11 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 25 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 31 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 51 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. CTBI’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 58 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.408) is normal, around the industry mean (1.262). P/E Ratio (11.538) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.480). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.220) is also within normal values, averaging (1.194). Dividend Yield (0.041) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.606) is also within normal values, averaging (3.740).
BFC | CTBI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 30 | 25 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 47 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CTBI's Valuation (58) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFC (94). This means that CTBI’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFC’s over the last 12 months.
BFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CTBI (11). This means that BFC’s stock grew similarly to CTBI’s over the last 12 months.
CTBI's SMR Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BFC (30). This means that CTBI’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.
BFC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CTBI (51). This means that BFC’s stock grew similarly to CTBI’s over the last 12 months.
CTBI's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BFC (32). This means that CTBI’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.
| BFC | CTBI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 27 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 45% | 6 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 50% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BFC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while CTBI’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BFC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CTBI’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
BFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.01% price change this week, while CTBI (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.80%.
BFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 19, 2027.
CTBI is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2027.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFC has been closely correlated with IBCP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFC jumps, then IBCP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFC | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| IBCP - BFC | 78% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| FMBH - BFC | 77% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| BY - BFC | 76% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| CTBI - BFC | 76% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| SRCE - BFC | 75% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTBI has been closely correlated with SBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CTBI jumps, then SBSI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTBI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTBI | 100% | -0.19% | ||
| SBSI - CTBI | 81% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| BY - CTBI | 81% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| CPF - CTBI | 81% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| FCF - CTBI | 80% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| AUB - CTBI | 80% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
More | ||||