This stock comparison examines two well-regarded regional bank holding companies: BFC, the parent of Bank First, N.A., headquartered in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and CTBI, the parent of Community Trust Bank, Inc., based in Pikeville, Kentucky. Though they operate in different geographic markets, both institutions share a community-banking ethos, strong deposit franchises, and disciplined credit cultures that make them frequent subjects of interest among regional-bank investors. This analysis is particularly relevant for those evaluating relative performance, growth strategies, and market positioning within the U.S. regional banking landscape. By comparing their recent financial results, strategic initiatives, dividend policies, and stock price trajectories, traders and long-term investors alike can better assess how these two names stack up.
BFC, Bank First Corporation, is the holding company for Bank First, N.A., a relationship-focused community bank founded in 1894 and serving customers throughout Wisconsin and, following its most recent acquisition, northern Illinois. The bank offers a full suite of commercial, mortgage, and consumer lending products alongside deposit, treasury management, and wealth management services through its 38 banking locations. The company also maintains a 40% ownership stake in Ansay & Associates, an independent insurance agency that contributes meaningfully to noninterest income.
In recent market activity, BFC shares have advanced roughly 25% year-to-date, reflecting investor optimism around the company's growth trajectory. The most significant catalyst has been the January 1, 2026 closing of its all-stock acquisition of Centre 1 Bancorp, Inc., the parent company of First National Bank and Trust Company, headquartered in Beloit, Wisconsin. This merger — described by management as "the most transformational event in Bank First's 131-year history" — added approximately $1.55 billion in assets and expanded the bank's footprint into Rock, Walworth, and Green counties in Wisconsin and Winnebago County in Illinois. The combined entity now holds approximately $6 billion in total assets.
For the full year 2025, BFC reported net income of $71.5 million, or $7.23 per diluted share, representing an 11.4% increase in EPS compared to 2024. On an adjusted basis excluding merger-related costs and other one-time items, EPS reached $7.42. The bank's NIM (net interest margin — the spread between interest income earned and interest paid to depositors) expanded to 4.01% in the fourth quarter, driven by higher yields on newly originated and renewed loans. Asset quality remains pristine, with nonperforming assets representing just 0.20% of total assets at year-end. The board also declared an 11.1% increase in the quarterly dividend to $0.50 per share, reinforcing confidence in the earnings outlook.
CTBI, Community Trust Bancorp, Inc., is a Kentucky-based bank holding company whose origins trace back to 1903. Through its subsidiary, Community Trust Bank, Inc., the company operates 72 banking locations across eastern, northeastern, central, and south-central Kentucky, six locations in southern West Virginia, and three in northeastern Tennessee, complemented by five trust offices. With total assets of approximately $6.6 billion, CTBI ranks as the third-largest Kentucky-domiciled bank holding company and holds the second-largest deposit market share among Kentucky-based FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) insured institutions.
CTBI shares have been among the stronger performers in the regional banking space, posting a year-to-date gain of roughly 41% and a one-year return approaching 47%. This momentum reflects a series of positive earnings surprises and sustained organic growth. For the full year 2025, CTBI reported record net income of $98.1 million, or $5.44 per diluted share, an 18% increase over 2024. Return on average assets (ROAA) improved to 1.53%, while return on average equity (ROAE) reached 12.07%. Net interest income for the year climbed to approximately $219 million, supported by a 9.1% expansion in the loan portfolio to $4.9 billion.
A hallmark of CTBI is its dividend consistency: in July 2025, the company increased its quarterly cash dividend by 12.8% to $0.53 per share, marking the 45th consecutive year of dividend growth. The efficiency ratio — a key profitability metric in banking where a lower number signals better cost control — improved to 48.70% in the fourth quarter, placing CTBI among the more operationally efficient banks in its peer group. Credit quality trends were also favorable, with nonperforming loans declining to $19.2 million at year-end and net charge-offs (debts unlikely to be recovered) remaining well-contained at an annualized 0.14% of average loans.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers traders and investors access to a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, and other instruments, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. The bots span a wide range of trading styles — from short-term day trading and swing trading to longer-duration trend-following strategies — with annualized returns among top performers reaching well into triple digits, win rates frequently exceeding 60%, and profit factors ranging above 4.0 in select models. Each bot operates with distinct parameters, including varying timeframes (5-minute, 15-minute, and 60-minute), unique sets of traded tickers, and proprietary stop-loss and position-sizing logic powered by Tickeron's Financial Learning Models (FLMs). For traders seeking AI-driven insights to complement their own analysis, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can provide a valuable starting point.
When comparing BFC and CTBI, several key contrasts emerge. From a scale perspective, CTBI is the larger institution, with roughly $6.6 billion in total assets versus BFC's approximately $6.0 billion pro forma following its January 2026 merger. CTBI also operates a considerably broader branch network — 81 locations across three states compared to BFC's 38 locations concentrated in Wisconsin and Illinois. Where BFC differentiates itself is in merger-driven growth: the Centre 1 Bancorp acquisition is the latest in a series of successful integrations, and the company has demonstrated an ability to extract cost savings and cross-sell insurance products through its Ansay partnership.
On profitability metrics, BFC holds a clear advantage in NIM, with its 4.01% fourth-quarter reading comfortably outpacing CTBI's net interest margin. BFC's higher proportion of noninterest-bearing deposits — roughly 27% of total deposits — helps keep funding costs low. CTBI, however, is more efficient on an operating basis, with a 48.70% efficiency ratio in Q4 2025 that ranks near the top of its peer group. BFC's full-year ROAA of 1.62% slightly edges CTBI's 1.53%, though CTBI's 18% EPS growth rate in 2025 exceeded BFC's 11%.
From a risk standpoint, both banks exhibit strong credit discipline. BFC's 0.20% nonperforming-asset ratio is marginally stronger than CTBI's, and BFC recorded no provision for credit losses in Q4 2025. CTBI carries a slightly higher level of net charge-offs but still at negligible levels relative to the portfolio. Geographically, CTBI benefits from greater diversification across Kentucky, West Virginia, and Tennessee, while BFC remains heavily exposed to Wisconsin's economy, though its Illinois expansion should help mitigate concentration risk over time. In terms of capital return, CTBI's 45-year dividend-increase streak speaks to extraordinary reliability, while BFC's recent special dividend of $3.50 per share and 11.1% quarterly dividend boost signal confidence from management in the post-merger earnings trajectory.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, recent momentum, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely lean toward CTBI in the current environment — but only modestly. CTBI's price action has exhibited stronger directional momentum, with its shares outpacing BFC by a wide margin on both a year-to-date and trailing one-year basis. The record earnings, 45-year dividend growth streak, and superior efficiency ratio point to a mature, well-managed franchise operating at a high level of consistency. BFC, however, presents a compelling counter-narrative: its recently closed merger could serve as a powerful multi-year catalyst, the bank's NIM leadership suggests superior underlying profitability on each dollar of earning assets, and its pristine credit quality provides a margin of safety that should not be overlooked. An AI model weighing trend strength and stability would likely favor CTBI for its momentum profile, while a model emphasizing forward catalysts and valuation might tilt toward BFC given the integration upside ahead. Ultimately, this is a nuanced comparison where neither stock is clearly inferior — both represent high-quality regional banking franchises with distinct but equally valid investment cases.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BFC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCTBI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CTBI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.99% price change this week, while CTBI (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.87%.
BFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.
CTBI is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| BFC | CTBI | BFC / CTBI | |
| Capitalization | 1.74B | 1.43B | 122% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.683 | 41.914 | 73% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.40 | 13.15 | 155% |
| Revenue | 191M | 291M | 66% |
| Total Cash | 64.4M | 91.6M | 70% |
| Total Debt | 125M | 80M | 156% |
BFC | CTBI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 87 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CTBI's Valuation (53) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFC (92). This means that CTBI’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFC’s over the last 12 months.
CTBI's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BFC (9). This means that CTBI’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.
CTBI's SMR Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BFC (59). This means that CTBI’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.
CTBI's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BFC (46). This means that CTBI’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.
CTBI's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BFC (34). This means that CTBI’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.
| BFC | CTBI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 43% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 44% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 40% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 56% | 5 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 44% | 11 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 47% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ERC | 9.26 | 0.01 | +0.11% |
| Allspring Multi-Sector Income Fund | |||
| TESL | 13.31 | -0.01 | -0.11% |
| Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF | |||
| SNOY | 11.58 | -0.14 | -1.19% |
| YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| MHNC | 12.00 | -0.22 | -1.80% |
| MAIDEN HOLDINGS NORTH AMERICA Ltd | |||
| IHAK | 66.74 | -1.62 | -2.37% |
| iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFC has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFC jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFC | 100% | -0.27% | ||
| PEBO - BFC | 77% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| IBCP - BFC | 77% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| CTBI - BFC | 76% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| BY - BFC | 76% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| UVSP - BFC | 75% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
More | ||||