Comparing two regional bank stocks such as BFC (Bank First Corporation) and PEBO (Peoples Bancorp Inc.) provides a useful lens for investors evaluating the financial services sector at a time when interest rate policy, credit conditions, and consolidation activity are all in flux. Both companies are community-oriented institutions with long operating histories and meaningful footprints in their respective regions. Yet their recent trajectories have diverged in instructive ways. This stock comparison examines how each bank has performed in recent market activity, what is driving sentiment around their shares, and where they may be headed next. Income-oriented investors, value seekers, and those watching regional bank M&A (mergers and acquisitions) dynamics may all find this relative performance analysis relevant.
BFC, the holding company for Bank First, N.A., is headquartered in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and has served communities across the state since 1894. The bank offers commercial, mortgage, and consumer lending alongside deposit and treasury management services. In recent months, the most significant development for Bank First has been the closing of its all-stock acquisition of Centre 1 Bancorp, the parent of First National Bank and Trust Company, on January 1, 2026. Valued at approximately $174.3 million, the transaction expanded Bank First's asset base to roughly $6 billion and marked the company's first move into Illinois. The acquisition also brought trust and wealth management capabilities to the franchise for the first time.
Financially, Bank First reported full-year 2025 net income of $71.5 million, or $7.23 per diluted share, up from $65.6 million, or $6.50 per share, in 2024 — an increase of more than 11%. The bank's net interest margin (NIM) has benefited from a normalization of the yield curve after an extended period of inversion, with loan repricing contributing positively to portfolio yields. In the most recent quarter, revenue reached new highs driven by the addition of the acquired loan portfolio. The board also raised the quarterly dividend by 11.1% to $0.50 per share. With a beta of 0.41, BFC shares have exhibited considerably less volatility than the broader market, appealing to investors with a preference for stability.
PEBO, headquartered in Marietta, Ohio, is a diversified financial services company operating through its subsidiary Peoples Bank. With a history stretching back over a century, the bank provides commercial and consumer banking, trust and investment services, insurance, and equipment leasing across Ohio, West Virginia, Kentucky, Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. In recent quarters, Peoples Bancorp has generated strong loan growth — annualized at approximately 11% in mid-2025 — and has posted four consecutive quarters of core NIM expansion. Full-year 2025 net income came in at approximately $110 million, with return on tangible equity (ROTCE, a measure of profitability relative to tangible shareholder capital) of 13.70%.
However, PEBO has also been working through elevated credit costs tied primarily to its small-ticket leasing portfolio, where net charge-off rates have run well above historical averages. In response, management has been actively reducing exposure to this segment. The company's provision for credit losses increased meaningfully during 2025, weighing on reported earnings per share (EPS), which declined year-over-year from $3.31 to $2.99. On the positive side, fee-based income has grown, the efficiency ratio has improved, and the bank's tangible equity-to-tangible-assets ratio has remained stable. CEO Tyler Wilcox demonstrated confidence by purchasing shares in the open market during the summer of 2025. The stock's one-year total return of roughly 50% reflects a market that has looked past near-term credit headwinds toward improving fundamentals.
Investors seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating stocks like BFC and PEBO may find value in exploring Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots, each designed to trade thousands of different tickers using distinct strategies, timeframes, and risk parameters. The Trending AI Robots section highlights only those bots that have demonstrated the strongest alignment with current market conditions — a curated selection that filters for real-time adaptability and performance consistency. These AI trading bots vary widely: some focus on short-term momentum signals, others on longer-duration trend-following or mean-reversion patterns. Performance statistics such as annualized returns, trade accuracy rates, and drawdown metrics are available for each bot, giving users visibility into track records before making decisions. For those interested in automating aspects of their trading or simply augmenting their own research with algorithmic insights, the Trending AI Robots section offers a practical starting point.
While both BFC and PEBO operate as community-focused regional banks, their profiles diverge meaningfully across several dimensions. In terms of business model, BFC has historically been a more concentrated Wisconsin franchise that is now executing a transformational M&A strategy to expand its geographic footprint. PEBO, by contrast, already operates across a broader multi-state geography and has a more diversified revenue mix that includes insurance and leasing alongside traditional banking.
From a growth-driver perspective, BFC's near-term story is heavily tied to successful integration of the Centre 1 Bancorp acquisition, which is expected to be strongly accretive to EPS in 2026 and 2027. PEBO's growth narrative is more organically driven, centered on mid-single-digit loan expansion, NIM stabilization, and gradually normalizing credit costs as the leasing portfolio runs off. On relative momentum, PEBO has delivered the stronger share-price appreciation over the past year, but this has come with higher volatility and periodic drawdowns tied to earnings misses. BFC has advanced more steadily, supported by consistent earnings beats and the perceived strategic value of its acquisition.
Risk factors also differ. BFC faces integration risk — aligning systems, cultures, and operations across two sizable community banks — and the usual execution uncertainty that accompanies any merger. PEBO's primary risk is credit normalization: if charge-offs in the leasing book do not subside as management expects, earnings could face continued pressure. On valuation, BFC trades at a higher P/E multiple (approximately 19.7x trailing earnings) compared to PEBO (approximately 12.2x), suggesting the market is pricing in stronger forward growth for BFC. PEBO, however, offers a more substantial dividend yield and a longer dividend track record of 52 consecutive years of payouts.
Based on observable data trends, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely express a modest preference for BFC at the current juncture, though with important caveats. BFC's steadier uptrend, lower beta, improving NIM trajectory, and the earnings-accretion tailwind from its recently closed acquisition create a favorable combination of growth and stability. The bank's track record of consistent execution and conservative risk management further supports this view. PEBO, while offering compelling value and strong recent momentum, continues to carry uncertainty around the pace of credit-cost normalization in its leasing portfolio. That said, if PEBO's credit trends improve faster than the market currently anticipates, the stock's lower valuation multiple could make it the higher-upside opportunity. In probabilistic terms, BFC appears to offer a more predictable near-term path, while PEBO presents a higher-risk, potentially higher-reward profile. Both warrant ongoing monitoring as conditions evolve.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BFC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePEBO’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEBO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.99% price change this week, while PEBO (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.87%.
BFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.
PEBO is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| BFC | PEBO | BFC / PEBO | |
| Capitalization | 1.74B | 1.48B | 118% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.683 | 42.707 | 72% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.40 | 12.45 | 164% |
| Revenue | 191M | 459M | 42% |
| Total Cash | 64.4M | 107M | 60% |
| Total Debt | 125M | 720M | 17% |
BFC | PEBO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 87 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PEBO's Valuation (17) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BFC (92) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PEBO’s stock grew significantly faster than BFC’s over the last 12 months.
BFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PEBO (17) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BFC’s stock grew similarly to PEBO’s over the last 12 months.
PEBO's SMR Rating (46) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BFC (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PEBO’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.
PEBO's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BFC (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PEBO’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.
PEBO's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BFC (34) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PEBO’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.
| BFC | PEBO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 44% | 11 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 40% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JCE | 17.27 | 0.03 | +0.17% |
| Nuveen Core Equity Alpha Fund | |||
| NBTR | 49.26 | N/A | N/A |
| Neuberger Berman Total Return Bond ETF | |||
| FJUN | 61.50 | -0.02 | -0.03% |
| FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Jun | |||
| MILK | 24.17 | -0.09 | -0.37% |
| Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF | |||
| BIB | 106.87 | -0.72 | -0.67% |
| ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFC has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFC jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFC | 100% | -0.27% | ||
| PEBO - BFC | 77% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| IBCP - BFC | 77% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| CTBI - BFC | 76% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| BY - BFC | 76% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| UVSP - BFC | 75% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEBO has been closely correlated with SRCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PEBO jumps, then SRCE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PEBO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEBO | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| SRCE - PEBO | 90% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| NWBI - PEBO | 87% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| PRK - PEBO | 87% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| HOPE - PEBO | 85% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| WSBC - PEBO | 85% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
More | ||||