BGS
Price
$3.53
Change
-$0.08 (-2.22%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
286.52M
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FLO
Price
$7.02
Change
-$0.12 (-1.68%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.49B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BGS vs FLO

BGS vs FLO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGS vs. FLO commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGS is a Hold and FLO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (BGS: $3.53 vs. FLO: $7.02)
Brand notoriety: BGS and FLO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGS: 84% vs. FLO: 113%
Market capitalization -- BGS: $286.52M vs. FLO: $1.49B
BGS [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $286.52M. FLO’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $1.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $255.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $3.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFLO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FLO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BGS and FLO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FLO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BGS and FLO are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BGS (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +0.57% price change this week, while FLO (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -9.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

BGS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

FLO is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.21% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLO($1.49B) has a higher market cap than BGS($287M). BGS YTD gains are higher at: -12.713 vs. FLO (-32.620). FLO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 356M vs. BGS (140M). FLO (2.05B) and BGS (2.06B) have identical debt. FLO has higher revenues than BGS: FLO (5.27B) vs BGS (1.81B).
BGSFLOBGS / FLO
Capitalization287M1.49B19%
EBITDA140M356M39%
Gain YTD-12.713-32.62039%
P/E RatioN/A20.06-
Revenue1.81B5.27B34%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.06B2.05B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGS vs FLO: Fundamental Ratings
BGS
FLO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
453
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9685
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7682
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4922
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (2) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BGS (3) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BGS (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's SMR Rating (85) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BGS (96) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.

BGS's Price Growth Rating (76) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as FLO (82) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BGS (49) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGSFLO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QISIX15.480.15
+0.98%
Pear Tree Polaris Intl Opps Instl
FMCKX47.430.17
+0.36%
Fidelity Advisor Focused Em Mkts C
COVAX15.190.03
+0.20%
Columbia Sm Cp Val and Inflection A
BRMKX17.64-0.05
-0.28%
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index K
BRSSX16.61-0.08
-0.48%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq R2

BGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGS has been loosely correlated with HAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGS jumps, then HAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGS
1D Price
Change %
BGS100%
-2.22%
HAIN - BGS
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.40%
HSY - BGS
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
HLF - BGS
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
MDLZ - BGS
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
FLO - BGS
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
More

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been loosely correlated with CAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then CAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
-1.68%
CAG - FLO
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.46%
GIS - FLO
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
MDLZ - FLO
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
CPB - FLO
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
TR - FLO
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
More