Advertisement
BGS vs MDLZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGS is a Hold and MDLZ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MDLZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BGS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MDLZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BGS (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -4.42% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +1.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.07%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -21.11%.
Reported Earning Dates
BGS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (+0.30% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.55% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| BGS | MDLZ | BGS / MDLZ | |
| Capitalization | 281M | 82.3B | 0% |
| EBITDA | 140M | 6.28B | 2% |
| Gain YTD | -14.444 | 21.767 | -66% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 23.61 | - |
| Revenue | 1.81B | 39.7B | 5% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.72B | - |
| Total Debt | 2.06B | 22.1B | 9% |
BGS | MDLZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 77 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 33 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BGS's Valuation (2) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as MDLZ (22). This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as BGS (100). This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's SMR Rating (61) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGS (96). This means that MDLZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGS’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGS (74). This means that MDLZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGS’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as BGS (47). This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.
| BGS | MDLZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 40% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 67% | 10 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 77% | 21 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 36% |
Advertisement
BGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGS has been loosely correlated with HAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGS jumps, then HAIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGS | 100% | +3.90% | ||
| HAIN - BGS | 41% Loosely correlated | +27.58% | ||
| HLF - BGS | 35% Loosely correlated | +4.12% | ||
| HSY - BGS | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| MDLZ - BGS | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.48% | ||
| NOMD - BGS | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.72% | ||
More | ||||
MDLZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDLZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDLZ | 100% | +0.48% | ||
| GIS - MDLZ | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| CAG - MDLZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| CPB - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| KHC - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| MKC - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
More | ||||