Both BIRK and LEVI operate in the competitive apparel and footwear sector, where consumer preferences for comfort, style, and durability drive market dynamics. This stock comparison evaluates their recent market positioning, financial metrics, and performance amid evolving retail trends like direct-to-consumer (DTC) growth and tariff impacts. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors focused on apparel stability will find value in understanding their contrasts in growth trajectories, margins, and risk profiles in the current environment.
Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) manufactures and sells footbed-based footwear, including sandals and closed-toe styles, alongside skincare accessories. Operating globally with a focus on premium products, it distributes via owned stores, e-commerce, and B2B channels. In recent market activity, BIRK has traded around $39, with a market cap of $7.23 billion and beta of 1.15 indicating moderate volatility. Year-to-date returns stand at 3.81%, lagging broader indices, while 1-year performance reflects a 25% decline from peaks near $60, pressured by tariff-related cost increases expected to impact fiscal 2026 gross margins by about 100 basis points. Q1 2026 revenue grew 11% reported (18% constant currency) to €402 million, with adjusted EBITDA up 4% despite FX headwinds, bolstering sentiment through operational resilience and APAC expansion (31% growth). Profit margins remain strong at 17.7%, supported by pricing power and premium mix shifts.
Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI) designs and markets apparel, including jeans, tops, and accessories under brands like Levi's and Beyond Yoga. It sells via third-party retailers, DTC channels, and franchisees worldwide. Recently, shares hover near $23, with a $8.72 billion market cap and beta of 1.34 signaling higher sensitivity to market swings. YTD performance of 10.69% outperforms the S&P 500, alongside 36% 1-year gains, driven by robust DTC momentum. Q1 fiscal 2026 net revenues increased 14% to $1.7 billion (9% organic), with DTC up significantly and adjusted EPS of $0.42 beating estimates. Gross margins held at 61.9% despite tariffs, aided by pricing and lower promotions. Operating margins at 12.5% reflect advertising investments, while ROE (return on equity) of 25.4% underscores efficient capital use in recent weeks' relative strength.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and sectors. Only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions—such as momentum in semiconductors, energy, or small-caps—earn a spot in this dynamic lineup of 25 bots out of 351 total. These bots showcase impressive stats, including annualized returns up to +285%, win rates of 70–88%, and profit factors reaching 11.7, with low drawdowns and varying trade durations from minutes to days. Whether short-term pattern recognition or sector rotation, they adapt via Financial Learning Models. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots aligning with your style and enhance decision-making on stocks like BIRK or LEVI.
BIRK and LEVI share sector exposure in consumer discretionary apparel/footwear but diverge in business models: BIRK's niche premium sandals emphasize footbed innovation and APAC growth (11% of revenue), while LEVI's broader denim portfolio leverages iconic branding and DTC acceleration (up 16% in Q1). Growth drivers contrast with BIRK's 11% revenue CAGR forecast versus LEVI's scale ($6.5B TTM revenue). Recent momentum favors LEVI (10.7% YTD vs. 3.8%), but BIRK edges margins (17.7% vs. 9.5%) and ROA, trading at similar trailing P/E (~16.5) yet lower P/S (2.91 vs. 1.39). Risk factors include tariffs hitting both (more acutely for import-reliant BIRK), with LEVI's higher beta (1.34 vs. 1.15) amplifying volatility. Market sentiment tilts toward LEVI's stability amid consumer spending caution.
Tickeron’s AI analysis, informed by trend consistency and relative metrics, currently favors LEVI with higher probability due to superior recent momentum, YTD outperformance, DTC catalysts, and attractive forward P/E of 12.8 amid stable earnings beats. While BIRK offers margin strength and undervaluation potential, tariff risks and weaker price action position it less optimally in the near term.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BIRK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLEVI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BIRK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEVI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BIRK (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а -9.66% price change this week, while LEVI (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was -1.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was -5.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.92%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.43%.
BIRK is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
LEVI is expected to report earnings on Jul 02, 2026.
Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.
@Apparel/Footwear (-0.64% weekly)Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.
| BIRK | LEVI | BIRK / LEVI | |
| Capitalization | 7.96B | 9.08B | 88% |
| EBITDA | 662M | 949M | 70% |
| Gain YTD | 5.868 | 15.281 | 38% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.66 | 17.36 | 113% |
| Revenue | 2.18B | 6.5B | 34% |
| Total Cash | 201M | 812M | 25% |
| Total Debt | 1.37B | 2.32B | 59% |
LEVI | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BIRK | LEVI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 73% | 15 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 7 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 71% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BIRK has been loosely correlated with RL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BIRK jumps, then RL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BIRK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIRK | 100% | -6.09% | ||
| RL - BIRK | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| DECK - BIRK | 44% Loosely correlated | -3.24% | ||
| VFC - BIRK | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.73% | ||
| LEVI - BIRK | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| PVH - BIRK | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEVI has been loosely correlated with SHOO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LEVI jumps, then SHOO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEVI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEVI | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| SHOO - LEVI | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.30% | ||
| RL - LEVI | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| CAL - LEVI | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.58% | ||
| PVH - LEVI | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| CROX - LEVI | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
More | ||||