Comparing BIRK and VFC offers insights into footwear and apparel dynamics within the consumer cyclical sector. Birkenstock Holding plc specializes in footbed-based sandals, while V.F. Corporation manages a diverse portfolio including The North Face, Vans, and Timberland. Traders seeking growth in premium footwear and investors eyeing turnaround stories in lifestyle brands will find this stock comparison relevant for assessing relative performance, sector exposure, and market sentiment amid evolving consumer trends and economic pressures.
Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) manufactures and sells footwear with a focus on footbed designs across Americas, Europe, and APAC. In recent market activity, shares have risen about 6% over the past month, trading near $39 with a market cap of $7.23 billion. Fiscal 2025 revenue reached €2.1 billion, up 16% reported and 18% constant currency, driven by double-digit growth in all regions. Q1 2026 showed €402 million revenue (11% up reported, 18% constant currency) and adjusted EBITDA of €106 million.
Sentiment reflects resilience in premium demand but caution from U.S. tariffs, expected to trim gross margins by 100 basis points (1%) in fiscal 2026. Stock momentum includes a 25% 1-year return, though YTD lags the S&P 500 at 4% versus 8%. Analysts note operational discipline supporting EPS growth amid consumer challenges.
V.F. Corporation (VFC) designs branded apparel, footwear, and accessories through segments like Outdoor, Active, and Work, featuring brands such as Timberland and Vans. Shares recently traded around $19 with a $7.43 billion market cap, posting monthly gains near 12% in recent weeks. Q3 fiscal 2026 revenue hit $2.88 billion, up 1% year-over-year and beating estimates, with adjusted gross margin at 57% excluding Dickies.
Performance stems from the Reinvent program, boosting direct-to-consumer sales and profitability in core brands like The North Face. YTD return stands at 5-6%, with a robust 44% over one year outperforming the S&P 500's 31%. Recent earnings beat expectations, signaling momentum in Americas and holiday strength, though broader revenue trends remain mixed amid brand revitalization.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots selected from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and sectors. These curated bots excel in current market conditions, with standout performers delivering annualized returns up to 135% (e.g., GGLL AI Agent on 15-minute timeframe with 69% win rate), 96% in semiconductors, and profit factors ranging 1.6-3.3. Win rates often hit 60-70%, with average trade durations from hours to weeks, emphasizing momentum, sector rotation, and pattern recognition in areas like tech, industrials, and leveraged ETFs. Tickeron’s hundreds of AI Trading Bots offer varied styles—from swing trading to scalping—tailored for short-term gains or long-term trends. Explore these high-performing options to enhance your strategy.
BIRK and VFC share consumer cyclical exposure but differ in business models: BIRK’s niche premium footwear yields higher margins (around 56-57%) and focused growth, versus VFC’s multi-brand diversification across apparel and workwear for broader risk spread. Growth drivers contrast with BIRK’s APAC expansion (31% revenue rise) against VFC’s Reinvent-fueled DTC recovery.
Recent momentum favors VFC’s 12% monthly gains over BIRK’s 6%, reflecting VFC’s brand revitalization versus BIRK’s tariff headwinds. Risk factors include BIRK’s import reliance amplifying margin pressure, while VFC navigates past Vans weakness but gains from outdoor demand. Sector-wise, both tap footwear/apparel, yet VFC’s active/outdoor tilt offers cyclical resilience. Sentiment leans positive for BIRK’s profitability (P/E ~17) but VFC’s value in turnaround potential.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors VFC due to stronger recent momentum, consistent earnings beats, and relative stability from diversified brands amid sector volatility. Observable trend consistency in VFC’s 44% 1-year return and DTC catalysts positions it probabilistically ahead, though BIRK’s growth profile warrants monitoring for tariff resolutions.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BIRK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BIRK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BIRK (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а -9.66% price change this week, while VFC (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was -5.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was -5.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.92%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.33%.
BIRK is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
VFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.
@Apparel/Footwear (-0.77% weekly)Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.
| BIRK | VFC | BIRK / VFC | |
| Capitalization | 7.96B | 6.68B | 119% |
| EBITDA | 662M | 789M | 84% |
| Gain YTD | 5.868 | -4.810 | -122% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.66 | 26.61 | 74% |
| Revenue | 2.18B | 9.61B | 23% |
| Total Cash | 201M | 613M | 33% |
| Total Debt | 1.37B | 4.98B | 28% |
VFC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BIRK | VFC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 73% | 9 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 7 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 78% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KLAY.X | 0.037290 | 0.000157 | +0.42% |
| Klaytn cryptocurrency | |||
| INJ.X | 4.814473 | -0.001646 | -0.03% |
| Injective cryptocurrency | |||
| LAZIO.X | 0.420987 | -0.003004 | -0.71% |
| S.S. Lazio Fan Token cryptocurrency | |||
| ONE.X | 0.001376 | -0.000015 | -1.10% |
| Harmony cryptocurrency | |||
| KAVA.X | 0.047131 | -0.000783 | -1.63% |
| Kava cryptocurrency | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BIRK has been loosely correlated with RL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BIRK jumps, then RL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BIRK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIRK | 100% | -6.09% | ||
| RL - BIRK | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| DECK - BIRK | 44% Loosely correlated | -3.24% | ||
| VFC - BIRK | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.73% | ||
| LEVI - BIRK | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| PVH - BIRK | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VFC has been loosely correlated with SHOO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VFC jumps, then SHOO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VFC | 100% | -1.73% | ||
| SHOO - VFC | 63% Loosely correlated | -3.30% | ||
| COLM - VFC | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.51% | ||
| WWW - VFC | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| NKE - VFC | 57% Loosely correlated | -4.45% | ||
| DECK - VFC | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.24% | ||
More | ||||