CXM
Price
$5.00
Change
+$0.03 (+0.60%)
Updated
Jun 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.17B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TEAM
Price
$81.52
Change
+$0.17 (+0.21%)
Updated
Jun 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
20.69B
36 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXM vs TEAM

CXM vs TEAM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXM vs. TEAM commentary
Jun 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXM is a Hold and TEAM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 25, 2026
Stock price -- (CXM: $4.97 vs. TEAM: $81.35)
Brand notoriety: CXM: Not notable vs. TEAM: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXM: 69% vs. TEAM: 63%
Market capitalization -- CXM: $1.16B vs. TEAM: $20.64B
CXM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.16B. TEAM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $20.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTEAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CXM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TEAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TEAM is a better buy in the long-term than CXM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEAM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TEAM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CXM is a better buy in the short-term than TEAM.

Price Growth

CXM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.87% price change this week, while TEAM (@Packaged Software) price change was -7.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

CXM is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2026.

TEAM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.94% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEAM($20.7B) has a higher market cap than CXM($1.17B). CXM YTD gains are higher at: -36.118 vs. TEAM (-49.827). CXM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 71.1M vs. TEAM (-21.17M). TEAM has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. CXM (443M). CXM has less debt than TEAM: CXM (43.8M) vs TEAM (1.24B). TEAM has higher revenues than CXM: TEAM (6.19B) vs CXM (871M).
CXMTEAMCXM / TEAM
Capitalization1.17B20.7B6%
EBITDA71.1M-21.17M-336%
Gain YTD-36.118-49.82772%
P/E Ratio41.25N/A-
Revenue871M6.19B14%
Total Cash443M1.14B39%
Total Debt43.8M1.24B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TEAM: Fundamental Ratings
TEAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
62
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXMTEAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TEAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DRMCX6.84N/A
N/A
Virtus Silvant Mid-Cap Growth Inst
CBEJX11.03N/A
N/A
Allspring Large Cap Value CL R6
SUWCX34.77N/A
N/A
DWS Core Equity C
MWECX30.60N/A
N/A
MFS Global Equity C
FINFX101.24-1.78
-1.73%
American Funds Fundamental Invs F2

CXM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXM has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXM jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXM
1D Price
Change %
CXM100%
+0.40%
FRSH - CXM
68%
Closely correlated
+2.91%
BL - CXM
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.47%
SPT - CXM
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
DOCU - CXM
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
ASAN - CXM
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
More

TEAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEAM has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEAM jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TEAM
1D Price
Change %
TEAM100%
+1.74%
CRM - TEAM
72%
Closely correlated
+2.20%
HUBS - TEAM
72%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
WDAY - TEAM
72%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
ASAN - TEAM
71%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
FRSH - TEAM
69%
Closely correlated
+2.91%
More