BLD
Price
$354.53
Change
-$5.23 (-1.45%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
9.94B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FLR
Price
$50.77
Change
-$0.34 (-0.67%)
Updated
Jul 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.09B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLD vs FLR

BLD vs FLR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLD vs. FLR commentary
Jul 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLD is a Hold and FLR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 16, 2026
Stock price -- (BLD: $354.53 vs. FLR: $51.12)
Brand notoriety: BLD and FLR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLD: 221% vs. FLR: 66%
Market capitalization -- BLD: $9.94B vs. FLR: $7.09B
BLD [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $9.94B. FLR’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $7.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $9.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFLR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FLR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BLD and FLR are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FLR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLR is a better buy in the short-term than BLD.

Price Growth

BLD (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FLR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +5.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLD is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

FLR is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-0.90% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLD($9.94B) has a higher market cap than FLR($7.09B). BLD (23.25) and FLR (23.18) have similar P/E ratio . FLR YTD gains are higher at: 28.993 vs. BLD (-15.020). BLD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 991M vs. FLR (-206M). FLR has more cash in the bank: 3.67B vs. BLD (269M). FLR has less debt than BLD: FLR (1.07B) vs BLD (3.13B). FLR has higher revenues than BLD: FLR (15.2B) vs BLD (5.62B).
BLDFLRBLD / FLR
Capitalization9.94B7.09B140%
EBITDA991M-206M-481%
Gain YTD-15.02028.993-52%
P/E Ratio23.2523.18100%
Revenue5.62B15.2B37%
Total Cash269M3.67B7%
Total Debt3.13B1.07B292%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLD vs FLR: Fundamental Ratings
BLD
FLR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4585
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5743
SMR RATING
1..100
4269
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7554
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
213
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLR's Valuation (68) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as BLD (73) in the Building Products industry. This means that FLR’s stock grew similarly to BLD’s over the last 12 months.

FLR's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as BLD (57) in the Building Products industry. This means that FLR’s stock grew similarly to BLD’s over the last 12 months.

BLD's SMR Rating (42) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as FLR (69) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that BLD’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.

FLR's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as BLD (75) in the Building Products industry. This means that FLR’s stock grew similarly to BLD’s over the last 12 months.

FLR's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as BLD (21) in the Building Products industry. This means that FLR’s stock grew similarly to BLD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLDFLR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X64956.1130002716.992200
+4.37%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME22.430.40
+1.82%
GameStop Corp
TSLA396.181.42
+0.36%
Tesla
SPY751.832.66
+0.36%
State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL314.86-2.45
-0.77%
Apple

BLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLD has been loosely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLD jumps, then APG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLD
1D Price
Change %
BLD100%
N/A
APG - BLD
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
FER - BLD
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
GVA - BLD
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
IESC - BLD
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
ATCX - BLD
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More