BLK
Price
$1099.15
Change
-$9.61 (-0.87%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
170.21B
34 days until earnings call
PGPHF
Price
$1357.47
Change
+$52.08 (+3.99%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
34.46B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLK vs PGPHF

Header iconBLK vs PGPHF Comparison
Open Charts BLK vs PGPHFBanner chart's image
Blackrock
Price$1099.15
Change-$9.61 (-0.87%)
Volume$487.6K
Capitalization170.21B
Partners Group Holding Zug Namen-Akt
Price$1357.47
Change+$52.08 (+3.99%)
Volume$28
Capitalization34.46B
BLK vs PGPHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLK vs. PGPHF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLK is a Buy and PGPHF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BLK: $1099.15 vs. PGPHF: $1357.47)
Brand notoriety: BLK and PGPHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLK: 94% vs. PGPHF: 38%
Market capitalization -- BLK: $170.21B vs. PGPHF: $34.46B
BLK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $170.21B. PGPHF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $34.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLK’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePGPHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PGPHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLK is a better buy in the long-term than PGPHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGPHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PGPHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLK is a better buy in the short-term than PGPHF.

Price Growth

BLK (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.02% price change this week, while PGPHF (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLK is expected to report earnings on Oct 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLK($170B) has a higher market cap than PGPHF($34.5B). BLK has higher P/E ratio than PGPHF: BLK (26.57) vs PGPHF (23.80). BLK YTD gains are higher at: 8.891 vs. PGPHF (2.430). BLK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.76B vs. PGPHF (1.45B). PGPHF has less debt than BLK: PGPHF (2.14B) vs BLK (14.7B). BLK has higher revenues than PGPHF: BLK (21.6B) vs PGPHF (2.02B).
BLKPGPHFBLK / PGPHF
Capitalization170B34.5B493%
EBITDA9.76B1.45B675%
Gain YTD8.8912.430366%
P/E Ratio26.5723.80112%
Revenue21.6B2.02B1,070%
Total CashN/A289M-
Total Debt14.7B2.14B686%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLK vs PGPHF: Fundamental Ratings
BLK
PGPHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7758
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3073
SMR RATING
1..100
5421
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4862
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2871
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PGPHF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as BLK (33) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that PGPHF’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGPHF (73) in the null industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

PGPHF's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (54) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that PGPHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as PGPHF (62) in the null industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to PGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGPHF (71) in the null industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLKPGPHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSPH29.580.29
+0.99%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Hlth Care ETF
HEEM31.730.30
+0.95%
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Em Mkts ETF
CATF49.120.35
+0.71%
American Century California Muni Bd ETF
USIG52.040.26
+0.50%
iShares Broad USD Invm Grd Corp Bd ETF
KNCT118.48N/A
N/A
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF

BLK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLK has been closely correlated with STT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLK jumps, then STT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLK
1D Price
Change %
BLK100%
-0.40%
STT - BLK
76%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
JHG - BLK
75%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
BX - BLK
73%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
TROW - BLK
73%
Closely correlated
-3.01%
AMG - BLK
73%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
More

PGPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGPHF and BRDG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGPHF and BRDG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGPHF
1D Price
Change %
PGPHF100%
+3.99%
BRDG - PGPHF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLK - PGPHF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
BN - PGPHF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
BAM - PGPHF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
IVZ - PGPHF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
More