BLK
Price
$1082.15
Change
+$11.58 (+1.08%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
124.17B
9 days until earnings call
SLFPY
Price
$10.78
Change
+$0.74 (+7.37%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.79B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLK vs SLFPY

Header iconBLK vs SLFPY Comparison
Open Charts BLK vs SLFPYBanner chart's image
Blackrock
Price$1082.15
Change+$11.58 (+1.08%)
Volume$342.68K
Capitalization124.17B
Aberdeen Group
Price$10.78
Change+$0.74 (+7.37%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization5.79B
BLK vs SLFPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLFPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLK vs. SLFPY commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLK is a StrongBuy and SLFPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BLK: $1082.15 vs. SLFPY: $10.78)
Brand notoriety: BLK and SLFPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLK: 60% vs. SLFPY: 106%
Market capitalization -- BLK: $124.17B vs. SLFPY: $5.79B
BLK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $124.17B. SLFPY’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLK’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSLFPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SLFPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLK is a better buy in the long-term than SLFPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLFPY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLFPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLK is a better buy in the short-term than SLFPY.

Price Growth

BLK (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.98% price change this week, while SLFPY (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLK is expected to report earnings on Oct 10, 2025.

SLFPY is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLK($124B) has a higher market cap than SLFPY($5.79B). BLK has higher P/E ratio than SLFPY: BLK (22.65) vs SLFPY (7.89). SLFPY YTD gains are higher at: 59.491 vs. BLK (6.703). BLK has higher revenues than SLFPY: BLK (17.9B) vs SLFPY (2.31B).
BLKSLFPYBLK / SLFPY
Capitalization124B5.79B2,142%
EBITDA7.87BN/A-
Gain YTD6.70359.49111%
P/E Ratio22.657.89287%
Revenue17.9B2.31B774%
Total Cash10.6BN/A-
Total Debt9.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLK vs SLFPY: Fundamental Ratings
BLK
SLFPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2787
SMR RATING
1..100
5552
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLFPY's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (49) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that SLFPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLFPY (87) in the null industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLFPY’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPY's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as BLK (55) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that SLFPY’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Price Growth Rating (14) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SLFPY (39) in the null industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to SLFPY’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLFPY (100) in the null industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew significantly faster than SLFPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLKSLFPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLFPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAMC44.540.34
+0.77%
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alt ETF
DLS75.480.33
+0.44%
WisdomTree International SmallCp Div ETF
VALQ63.280.24
+0.38%
American Century® U.S. Quality Value ETF
RZC25.35-0.04
-0.16%
Reinsurance Group of America
ARKZ27.15-0.27
-0.99%
ARK 21Shares Active Ethereum FutsStgyETF

BLK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLK has been closely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLK jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLK
1D Price
Change %
BLK100%
+1.08%
IVZ - BLK
78%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
BN - BLK
77%
Closely correlated
+2.67%
STT - BLK
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
JHG - BLK
75%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
BX - BLK
74%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
More

SLFPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLFPY and SLFPF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLFPY and SLFPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLFPY
1D Price
Change %
SLFPY100%
+7.36%
SLFPF - SLFPY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OWL - SLFPY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
BLK - SLFPY
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
FNCSF - SLFPY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNS - SLFPY
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
More