BLK
Price
$833.59
Change
-$54.06 (-6.09%)
Updated
Apr 4, 02:30 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
124.17B
7 days until earnings call
SLFPY
Price
$8.45
Change
-$0.01 (-0.12%)
Updated
Mar 28 closing price
Capitalization
5.79B
Ad is loading...

BLK vs SLFPY

Header iconBLK vs SLFPY Comparison
Open Charts BLK vs SLFPYBanner chart's image
Blackrock
Price$833.59
Change-$54.06 (-6.09%)
Volume$1.59K
Capitalization124.17B
Aberdeen Group PLCá
Price$8.45
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization5.79B
BLK vs SLFPY Comparison Chart
Loading...
BLK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLK vs. SLFPY commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLK is a Hold and SLFPY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BLK: $887.65 vs. SLFPY: $8.44)
Brand notoriety: BLK and SLFPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLK: 97% vs. SLFPY: 124%
Market capitalization -- BLK: $124.17B vs. SLFPY: $5.79B
BLK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $124.17B. SLFPY’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLFPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLFPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLK is a better buy in the long-term than SLFPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BLK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BLK (@Investment Managers) experienced а -8.29% price change this week, while SLFPY (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -4.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLK is expected to report earnings on Apr 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-4.02% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLK($124B) has a higher market cap than SLFPY($5.79B). BLK has higher P/E ratio than SLFPY: BLK (22.65) vs SLFPY (7.89). SLFPY YTD gains are higher at: 24.944 vs. BLK (-12.937). BLK has higher revenues than SLFPY: BLK (17.9B) vs SLFPY (2.31B).
BLKSLFPYBLK / SLFPY
Capitalization124B5.79B2,142%
EBITDA7.87BN/A-
Gain YTD-12.93724.944-52%
P/E Ratio22.657.89287%
Revenue17.9B2.31B774%
Total Cash10.6BN/A-
Total Debt9.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLK vs SLFPY: Fundamental Ratings
BLK
SLFPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5593
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
28100
SMR RATING
1..100
5652
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLFPY's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLK (86) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that SLFPY’s stock grew significantly faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLFPY (100) in the null industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew significantly faster than SLFPY’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPY's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as BLK (56) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that SLFPY’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as BLK (50) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that SLFPY’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLFPY (100) in the null industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLFPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BLK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DYN9.42-0.49
-4.94%
Dyne Therapeutics
FSI4.55-0.32
-6.57%
Flexible Solutions International
XYL110.99-8.06
-6.77%
Xylem
PAMT11.11-1.08
-8.86%
Pamt Corp
UMBF90.90-9.63
-9.58%
UMB Financial Corp

BLK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLK has been closely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLK jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLK
1D Price
Change %
BLK100%
-7.71%
IVZ - BLK
69%
Closely correlated
-11.85%
JHG - BLK
65%
Loosely correlated
-11.05%
BN - BLK
64%
Loosely correlated
-7.41%
TROW - BLK
63%
Loosely correlated
-8.18%
BX - BLK
62%
Loosely correlated
-9.86%
More

SLFPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLFPY and SLFPF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLFPY and SLFPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLFPY
1D Price
Change %
SLFPY100%
N/A
SLFPF - SLFPY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OWL - SLFPY
26%
Poorly correlated
-15.36%
BLK - SLFPY
25%
Poorly correlated
-7.71%
FNCSF - SLFPY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNS - SLFPY
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.85%
More