BN
Price
$65.77
Change
+$0.31 (+0.47%)
Updated
Aug 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
97.88B
76 days until earnings call
SEIC
Price
$88.85
Change
-$1.67 (-1.84%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
10.98B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BN vs SEIC

Header iconBN vs SEIC Comparison
Open Charts BN vs SEICBanner chart's image
Brookfield
Price$65.77
Change+$0.31 (+0.47%)
Volume$44.2K
Capitalization97.88B
SEI Investments
Price$88.85
Change-$1.67 (-1.84%)
Volume$519.25K
Capitalization10.98B
BN vs SEIC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BN vs. SEIC commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BN is a StrongBuy and SEIC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BN: $65.77 vs. SEIC: $88.85)
Brand notoriety: BN and SEIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BN: 73% vs. SEIC: 65%
Market capitalization -- BN: $97.88B vs. SEIC: $10.98B
BN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $97.88B. SEIC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $10.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSEIC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SEIC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the long-term than SEIC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEIC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SEIC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SEIC is a better buy in the short-term than BN.

Price Growth

BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.61% price change this week, while SEIC (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

SEIC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.79% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($97.9B) has a higher market cap than SEIC($11B). BN has higher P/E ratio than SEIC: BN (149.48) vs SEIC (17.02). BN YTD gains are higher at: 14.869 vs. SEIC (8.343). BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.3B vs. SEIC (957M). BN has more cash in the bank: 22.9B vs. SEIC (778M). SEIC has less debt than BN: SEIC (29M) vs BN (251B). BN has higher revenues than SEIC: BN (76.1B) vs SEIC (2.21B).
BNSEICBN / SEIC
Capitalization97.9B11B890%
EBITDA30.3B957M3,166%
Gain YTD14.8698.343178%
P/E Ratio149.4817.02879%
Revenue76.1B2.21B3,450%
Total Cash22.9B778M2,943%
Total Debt251B29M865,517%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BN vs SEIC: Fundamental Ratings
BN
SEIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5876
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2222
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
507

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BN's Valuation (33) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SEIC (92). This means that BN’s stock grew somewhat faster than SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SEIC (22). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

BN's SMR Rating (100) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SEIC (100). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (49). This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (100). This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNSEIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OCIO36.540.18
+0.48%
ClearShares OCIO ETF
IGCB46.47N/A
N/A
TCW Corporate Bond ETF
ULST40.67-0.01
-0.04%
SPDR® SSgA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF
LDEM56.19-0.10
-0.18%
iShares® ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF
SDVY38.11-0.11
-0.29%
First Trust SMID Cp Rising Div Achv ETF

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
+0.47%
BAM - BN
84%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
JHG - BN
81%
Closely correlated
N/A
KKR - BN
81%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
BX - BN
80%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
APO - BN
79%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
More

SEIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEIC
1D Price
Change %
SEIC100%
-1.84%
TROW - SEIC
78%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
JHG - SEIC
77%
Closely correlated
N/A
BN - SEIC
76%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
AMG - SEIC
74%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
KKR - SEIC
73%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
More