BN
Price
$56.08
Change
+$0.59 (+1.06%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
47 days until earnings call
SEIC
Price
$82.75
Change
+$1.28 (+1.57%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
32 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BN vs SEIC

Header iconBN vs SEIC Comparison
Open Charts BN vs SEICBanner chart's image
Brookfield
Price$56.08
Change+$0.59 (+1.06%)
Volume$33.61K
CapitalizationN/A
SEI Investments
Price$82.75
Change+$1.28 (+1.57%)
Volume$1.93M
CapitalizationN/A
BN vs SEIC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BN vs. SEIC commentary
Dec 21, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BN is a Hold and SEIC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 21, 2024
Stock price -- (BN: $56.09 vs. SEIC: $82.75)
Brand notoriety: BN and SEIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BN: 155% vs. SEIC: 223%
Market capitalization -- BN: $62.67B vs. SEIC: $9.3B
BN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $62.67B. SEIC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $9.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSEIC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SEIC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SEIC is a better buy in the long-term than BN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEIC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SEIC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the short-term than SEIC.

Price Growth

BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.28% price change this week, while SEIC (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

SEIC is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.15% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($62.7B) has a higher market cap than SEIC($9.3B). BN has higher P/E ratio than SEIC: BN (67.52) vs SEIC (20.47). BN YTD gains are higher at: 40.766 vs. SEIC (31.137). BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.7B vs. SEIC (669M). BN has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. SEIC (866M). SEIC has less debt than BN: SEIC (25.4M) vs BN (234B). BN has higher revenues than SEIC: BN (95.9B) vs SEIC (1.92B).
BNSEICBN / SEIC
Capitalization62.7B9.3B674%
EBITDA30.7B669M4,589%
Gain YTD40.76631.137131%
P/E Ratio67.5220.47330%
Revenue95.9B1.92B4,995%
Total Cash16.9B866M1,952%
Total Debt234B25.4M921,260%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BN vs SEIC: Fundamental Ratings
BN
SEIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7388
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2343
SMR RATING
1..100
8739
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1149
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BN's Valuation (72) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SEIC (86). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SEIC (43). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's SMR Rating (39) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BN (87). This means that SEIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (42). This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SEIC (49). This means that BN’s stock grew somewhat faster than SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNSEIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FITE67.061.07
+1.62%
SPDR® S&P Kensho Future Security ETF
SMH242.713.84
+1.61%
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
EPS61.910.68
+1.11%
WisdomTree US Earnings 500 ETF
EPV42.100.23
+0.54%
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe
CNYA28.290.08
+0.28%
iShares MSCI China A ETF

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
+1.08%
BAM - BN
80%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
BX - BN
70%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
JHG - BN
68%
Closely correlated
+2.04%
TROW - BN
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.79%
APAM - BN
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
More