BN
Price
$66.51
Change
-$0.05 (-0.08%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
99.78B
68 days until earnings call
SVVC
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
419.1K
Interact to see
Advertisement

BN vs SVVC

Header iconBN vs SVVC Comparison
Open Charts BN vs SVVCBanner chart's image
Brookfield
Price$66.51
Change-$0.05 (-0.08%)
Volume$1.2M
Capitalization99.78B
Firsthand Technology Value Fund
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.02K
Capitalization419.1K
BN vs SVVC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVVC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BN vs. SVVC commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BN is a StrongBuy and SVVC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BN: $66.51 vs. SVVC: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: BN and SVVC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BN: 49% vs. SVVC: 30%
Market capitalization -- BN: $99.78B vs. SVVC: $419.1K
BN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $99.78B. SVVC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $419.1K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSVVC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SVVC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the long-term than SVVC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVVC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SVVC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BN and SVVC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.20% price change this week, while SVVC (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($99.8B) has a higher market cap than SVVC($419K). BN has higher P/E ratio than SVVC: BN (151.16) vs SVVC (0.47). BN YTD gains are higher at: 16.161 vs. SVVC (-1.299). BN has more cash in the bank: 22.9B vs. SVVC (2.64K). BN has higher revenues than SVVC: BN (76.1B) vs SVVC (849K).
BNSVVCBN / SVVC
Capitalization99.8B419K23,818,616%
EBITDA30.3BN/A-
Gain YTD16.161-1.299-1,244%
P/E Ratio151.160.4732,162%
Revenue76.1B849K8,963,486%
Total Cash22.9B2.64K866,111,952%
Total Debt251BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BN vs SVVC: Fundamental Ratings
BN
SVVC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6171
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
21100
SMR RATING
1..100
9096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1185
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BN's Valuation (33) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SVVC (65) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to SVVC’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for SVVC (100) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew significantly faster than SVVC’s over the last 12 months.

BN's SMR Rating (90) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SVVC (96) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to SVVC’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SVVC (52) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to SVVC’s over the last 12 months.

BN's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for SVVC (85) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew significantly faster than SVVC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNSVVC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVVC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IJK96.680.53
+0.55%
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
UFIV49.560.13
+0.26%
F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF
PBOC28.390.07
+0.25%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Oct
BANX21.110.05
+0.24%
ArrowMark Financial Corp
PPH89.03N/A
N/A
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
-0.08%
BAM - BN
84%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
JHG - BN
81%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
KKR - BN
81%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
BX - BN
80%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
APO - BN
79%
Closely correlated
-2.38%
More

SVVC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVVC and HRZN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVVC and HRZN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVVC
1D Price
Change %
SVVC100%
+1.33%
HRZN - SVVC
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
BN - SVVC
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
GSBD - SVVC
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
SLRC - SVVC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
IVTBF - SVVC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More