BN
Price
$55.46
Change
-$3.55 (-6.02%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
49 days until earnings call
SVVC
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

BN vs SVVC

Header iconBN vs SVVC Comparison
Open Charts BN vs SVVCBanner chart's image
Brookfield
Price$55.46
Change-$3.55 (-6.02%)
Volume$3.53M
CapitalizationN/A
Firsthand Technology Value Fund
Price$0.06
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$21.65K
CapitalizationN/A
BN vs SVVC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVVC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BN vs. SVVC commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BN is a StrongSell and SVVC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BN: $55.46 vs. SVVC: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: BN and SVVC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BN: 200% vs. SVVC: 172%
Market capitalization -- BN: $62.67B vs. SVVC: $1.62M
BN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $62.67B. SVVC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSVVC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SVVC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the long-term than SVVC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVVC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SVVC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVVC is a better buy in the short-term than BN.

Price Growth

BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а -7.52% price change this week, while SVVC (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.12% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($62.7B) has a higher market cap than SVVC($1.62M). BN has higher P/E ratio than SVVC: BN (67.52) vs SVVC (7.32). BN YTD gains are higher at: 39.185 vs. SVVC (-78.633). BN has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. SVVC (165M). BN has higher revenues than SVVC: BN (95.9B) vs SVVC (-39.18M).
BNSVVCBN / SVVC
Capitalization62.7B1.62M3,870,370%
EBITDA30.7BN/A-
Gain YTD39.185-78.633-50%
P/E Ratio67.527.32922%
Revenue95.9B-39.18M-244,761%
Total Cash16.9B165M10,242%
Total Debt234BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BN vs SVVC: Fundamental Ratings
BN
SVVC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6763
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
24100
SMR RATING
1..100
8714
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4063
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1181
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SVVC's Valuation (49) in the null industry is in the same range as BN (71) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that SVVC’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for SVVC (100) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew significantly faster than SVVC’s over the last 12 months.

SVVC's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BN (87) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that SVVC’s stock grew significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SVVC (63) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to SVVC’s over the last 12 months.

BN's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for SVVC (81) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew significantly faster than SVVC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNSVVC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVVC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MOH296.594.81
+1.65%
Molina Healthcare
DXC20.83-0.47
-2.21%
DXC Technology Company
VHC3.86-0.16
-3.98%
VirnetX Holding Corp
ACEL10.82-0.53
-4.67%
Accel Entertainment
TWIN11.44-0.72
-5.92%
Twin Disc

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
-6.02%
BAM - BN
79%
Closely correlated
-7.02%
BX - BN
70%
Closely correlated
-6.23%
JHG - BN
66%
Closely correlated
-4.26%
TROW - BN
64%
Loosely correlated
-4.29%
APAM - BN
64%
Loosely correlated
-5.70%
More

SVVC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVVC and HRZN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVVC and HRZN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVVC
1D Price
Change %
SVVC100%
-11.22%
HRZN - SVVC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NXDT - SVVC
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.12%
BN - SVVC
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.02%
GSBD - SVVC
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
SLRC - SVVC
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
More