BN
Price
$58.86
Change
-$1.17 (-1.95%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
62.67B
74 days until earnings call
SVVC
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.62M
Ad is loading...

BN vs SVVC

Header iconBN vs SVVC Comparison
Open Charts BN vs SVVCBanner chart's image
Brookfield
Price$58.86
Change-$1.17 (-1.95%)
Volume$3.48M
Capitalization62.67B
Firsthand Technology Value Fund
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$276
Capitalization1.62M
BN vs SVVC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BN vs. SVVC commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BN is a Hold and SVVC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (BN: $58.86 vs. SVVC: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: BN and SVVC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BN: 160% vs. SVVC: 4%
Market capitalization -- BN: $62.67B vs. SVVC: $1.62M
BN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $62.67B. SVVC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSVVC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SVVC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the long-term than SVVC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.38% price change this week, while SVVC (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.66% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($62.7B) has a higher market cap than SVVC($1.62M). BN has higher P/E ratio than SVVC: BN (67.52) vs SVVC (7.32). SVVC YTD gains are higher at: 3.571 vs. BN (2.454). BN has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. SVVC (165M). BN has higher revenues than SVVC: BN (95.9B) vs SVVC (-39.18M).
BNSVVCBN / SVVC
Capitalization62.7B1.62M3,870,370%
EBITDA30.7BN/A-
Gain YTD2.4543.57169%
P/E Ratio67.527.32922%
Revenue95.9B-39.18M-244,761%
Total Cash16.9B165M10,242%
Total Debt234BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BN vs SVVC: Fundamental Ratings
BN
SVVC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
24100
SMR RATING
1..100
8715
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4564
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
477
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SVVC's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as BN (75) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that SVVC’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for SVVC (100) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew significantly faster than SVVC’s over the last 12 months.

SVVC's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BN (87) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that SVVC’s stock grew significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SVVC (64) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to SVVC’s over the last 12 months.

BN's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for SVVC (77) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew significantly faster than SVVC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PERI8.52-0.02
-0.23%
Perion Network Ltd
STT98.70-0.94
-0.94%
State Street Corp
CWD0.62-0.02
-2.38%
CaliberCos
CAMT76.39-3.50
-4.38%
Camtek Ltd
RGTI10.75-0.72
-6.28%
Rigetti Computing

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
-1.95%
BAM - BN
79%
Closely correlated
-2.87%
APAM - BN
69%
Closely correlated
-3.92%
JHG - BN
69%
Closely correlated
-1.88%
BX - BN
68%
Closely correlated
-3.37%
IVZ - BN
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
More

SVVC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVVC and HRZN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVVC and HRZN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVVC
1D Price
Change %
SVVC100%
+0.63%
HRZN - SVVC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NXDT - SVVC
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
BN - SVVC
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.95%
GSBD - SVVC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
SLRC - SVVC
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
More