BNT
Price
$43.64
Change
+$0.31 (+0.72%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
13.4B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NODK
Price
$13.45
Change
-$0.10 (-0.74%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
277.15M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNT vs NODK

Header iconBNT vs NODK Comparison
Open Charts BNT vs NODKBanner chart's image
Brookfield Wealth Solutions
Price$43.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.72%)
Volume$27.49K
Capitalization13.4B
NI Holdings
Price$13.45
Change-$0.10 (-0.74%)
Volume$6.03K
Capitalization277.15M
BNT vs NODK Comparison Chart in %
BNT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NODK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNT vs. NODK commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNT is a Hold and NODK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BNT: $43.64 vs. NODK: $13.45)
Brand notoriety: BNT and NODK are both not notable
BNT represents the Multi-Line Insurance, while NODK is part of the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNT: 82% vs. NODK: 62%
Market capitalization -- BNT: $13.4B vs. NODK: $277.15M
BNT [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $13.4B. NODK’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $277.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $130.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $32.01B. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNODK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NODK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNT is a better buy in the long-term than NODK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NODK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NODK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NODK is a better buy in the short-term than BNT.

Price Growth

BNT (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -6.99% price change this week, while NODK (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +1.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.16%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNT is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-0.40% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.07% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNT($13.4B) has a higher market cap than NODK($277M). NODK has higher P/E ratio than BNT: NODK (122.27) vs BNT (11.81). BNT YTD gains are higher at: 14.916 vs. NODK (-14.331). BNT has higher revenues than NODK: BNT (14.2B) vs NODK (310M).
BNTNODKBNT / NODK
Capitalization13.4B277M4,838%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.916-14.331-104%
P/E Ratio11.81122.2710%
Revenue14.2B310M4,581%
Total CashN/A199M-
Total Debt4.71BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NODK: Fundamental Ratings
NODK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
60
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNTNODK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NODK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JAPAF38.300.70
+1.86%
Japan Tobacco
AYALY7.00N/A
N/A
Ayala Corp.
WZZZY3.80N/A
N/A
Wizz Air Holdings PLC
SAVNF0.05N/A
N/A
SAVANNAH RESOURCES PLC
PUBC0.05N/A
N/A
Purebase Corporation

BNT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNT has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNT jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNT
1D Price
Change %
BNT100%
+0.72%
L - BNT
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
MKL - BNT
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
CINF - BNT
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
KMPR - BNT
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
HIG - BNT
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
More

NODK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NODK has been loosely correlated with UFCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NODK jumps, then UFCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NODK
1D Price
Change %
NODK100%
-0.74%
UFCS - NODK
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
HIPO - NODK
36%
Loosely correlated
+5.14%
BNT - NODK
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
HMN - NODK
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
L - NODK
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
More