BOMXF
Price
$2.08
Change
-$0.02 (-0.95%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.16B
RJF
Price
$175.71
Change
+$3.82 (+2.22%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
34.27B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOMXF vs RJF

Header iconBOMXF vs RJF Comparison
Open Charts BOMXF vs RJFBanner chart's image
Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V
Price$2.08
Change-$0.02 (-0.95%)
Volume$1.01M
Capitalization1.16B
Raymond James Financial
Price$175.71
Change+$3.82 (+2.22%)
Volume$16.49K
Capitalization34.27B
BOMXF vs RJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BOMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOMXF vs. RJF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOMXF is a Hold and RJF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BOMXF: $2.08 vs. RJF: $171.89)
Brand notoriety: BOMXF and RJF are both not notable
BOMXF represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while RJF is part of the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOMXF: 907% vs. RJF: 124%
Market capitalization -- BOMXF: $1.16B vs. RJF: $34.27B
BOMXF [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $1.16B. RJF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $34.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $148.05B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $177.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $29.35B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOMXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRJF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • BOMXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RJF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, RJF is a better buy in the long-term than BOMXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BOMXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RJF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BOMXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RJF is a better buy in the short-term than BOMXF.

Price Growth

BOMXF (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +0.48% price change this week, while RJF (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.54%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

RJF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-1.02% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Investment Managers (-2.00% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RJF($34.3B) has a higher market cap than BOMXF($1.16B). RJF has higher P/E ratio than BOMXF: RJF (16.85) vs BOMXF (12.52). BOMXF YTD gains are higher at: 29.193 vs. RJF (11.784). BOMXF has more cash in the bank: 3.42B vs. RJF (2.61B). BOMXF has less debt than RJF: BOMXF (423M) vs RJF (2.89B). RJF has higher revenues than BOMXF: RJF (13.6B) vs BOMXF (4.18B).
BOMXFRJFBOMXF / RJF
Capitalization1.16B34.3B3%
EBITDA2.99BN/A-
Gain YTD29.19311.784248%
P/E Ratio12.5216.8574%
Revenue4.18B13.6B31%
Total Cash3.42B2.61B131%
Total Debt423M2.89B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BOMXF vs RJF: Fundamental Ratings
BOMXF
RJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1617
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10014
SMR RATING
1..100
3810
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5316
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4728
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RJF's Valuation (82) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as BOMXF (90) in the null industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to BOMXF’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for BOMXF (100) in the null industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew significantly faster than BOMXF’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's SMR Rating (10) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as BOMXF (38) in the null industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to BOMXF’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BOMXF (53) in the null industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BOMXF’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as BOMXF (47) in the null industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to BOMXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOMXFRJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EAEMX17.15N/A
N/A
Parametric Emerging Markets A
CHDEX14.38N/A
N/A
Cullen High Dividend Equity Retail
SLPSX96.05N/A
N/A
ProFunds Small Cap Svc
TEDIX32.72N/A
N/A
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery A
USLYX70.16N/A
N/A
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth R2

BOMXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BOMXF and JEF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BOMXF and JEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOMXF
1D Price
Change %
BOMXF100%
N/A
JEF - BOMXF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
XP - BOMXF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
RJF - BOMXF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
EVR - BOMXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
SCHW - BOMXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
More

RJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RJF has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RJF jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RJF
1D Price
Change %
RJF100%
-0.01%
SF - RJF
87%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
MS - RJF
82%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
EVR - RJF
80%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
AMP - RJF
80%
Closely correlated
+0.01%
GS - RJF
80%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
More