MS
Price
$86.27
Change
-$0.56 (-0.64%)
Updated
Apr 12, 6:59 PM EST
2 days until earnings call
RJF
Price
$122.53
Change
-$1.90 (-1.53%)
Updated
Apr 12, 6:59 PM EST
10 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Analysis and predictions MS vs RJF

Header iconMS vs RJF Comparison
Open Charts MS vs RJFBanner chart's image
Morgan Stanley
Price$86.27
Change-$0.56 (-0.64%)
Volume$4.04M
CapitalizationN/A
Raymond James Financial
Price$122.53
Change-$1.90 (-1.53%)
Volume$320.74K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
MS vs RJF Comparison Chart

Loading...

MSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
RJFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
MS vs. RJF commentary
Apr 14, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MS is a Hold and RJF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 14, 2024
Stock price -- (MS: $93.53 vs. RJF: $128.52)
Brand notoriety: MS: Notable vs. RJF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MS: 41% vs. RJF: 76%
Market capitalization -- MS: $153.98B vs. RJF: $26.84B
MS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $153.98B. RJF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $26.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRJF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RJF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MS and RJF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RJF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MS is a better buy in the short-term than RJF.

Price Growth

MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.62% price change this week, while RJF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +1.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

MS is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2024.

RJF is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.29% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for MS with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for RJF with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MS($154B) has a higher market cap than RJF($26.8B). MS has higher P/E ratio than RJF: MS (18.06) vs RJF (16.09). RJF YTD gains are higher at: 15.673 vs. MS (1.283). MS has more cash in the bank: 4.29B vs. RJF (2.61B). RJF has less debt than MS: RJF (3.14B) vs MS (276B). MS has higher revenues than RJF: MS (50.7B) vs RJF (11.7B).
MSRJFMS / RJF
Capitalization154B26.8B575%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.28315.6738%
P/E Ratio18.0616.09112%
Revenue50.7B11.7B433%
Total Cash4.29B2.61B164%
Total Debt276B3.14B8,795%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MS vs RJF: Fundamental Ratings
MS
RJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1020
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1811
SMR RATING
1..100
58
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3014
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3536
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RJF's Valuation (86) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (89). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (18). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

MS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as RJF (8). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's Price Growth Rating (14) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (30). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

MS's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as RJF (36). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSRJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
RJFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BON0.42N/A
+1.12%
Bon Natural Life Limited
BHR2.020.02
+1.00%
Braemar Hotels & Resorts
AOS89.08-0.38
-0.42%
AO Smith Corp
TIPT17.14-0.14
-0.81%
Tiptree
LEG18.90-0.25
-1.31%
Leggett & Platt

RJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RJF has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RJF jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RJF
1D Price
Change %
RJF100%
+0.08%
SF - RJF
72%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
SCHW - RJF
68%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
VOYA - RJF
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
MS - RJF
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
LPLA - RJF
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
More