Advertisement
GS vs RJF
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Raymond James Financial (RJF) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Goldman Sachs (GS) reported record Q2 2026 equities trading revenue and EPS of $20.98, driving strong year-to-date performance near 22%.
- Raymond James Financial (RJF) emphasizes wealth management and advisor growth, with client assets showing steady increases amid a more conservative business profile.
- GS stock experienced heightened volatility in recent weeks, reaching all-time highs before a pullback following earnings.
- RJF has delivered more stable but comparatively modest returns relative to GS in recent market activity.
- Both firms operate in financial services yet differ markedly in scale, revenue mix, and exposure to market-sensitive segments such as trading and investment banking.
- Sector sentiment favors firms with robust trading and advisory momentum, influencing relative positioning between the two.
Introduction
This comparison examines Goldman Sachs (GS) and Raymond James Financial (RJF), two established players in the financial services sector. GS represents a global investment bank with significant trading and advisory operations, while RJF focuses primarily on wealth management and capital markets for individual and institutional clients. Investors and traders evaluating financial stocks for diversification, relative value, or sector exposure may find this analysis relevant. The review highlights observable differences in business models, recent performance trends, and market positioning to support informed assessment in the current environment.
GS Overview and Recent Performance
Goldman Sachs (GS) operates as a leading global investment bank and financial services firm, generating revenue through investment banking, institutional client services, asset and wealth management, and platform solutions. In recent market activity, the stock advanced strongly on a year-to-date basis, reflecting robust equities trading results and a favorable earnings backdrop. The company delivered Q2 2026 net revenues of $20.34 billion and diluted EPS of $20.98, with annualized return on common equity reaching 23.5%. Record stock-trading revenue contributed to positive sentiment, though the shares later experienced volatility after reaching near-term highs. Broader market factors, including trading volumes and deal activity, influenced performance during this period.
RJF Overview and Recent Performance
Raymond James Financial (RJF) provides wealth management, capital markets, and asset management services, with a notable emphasis on advisor recruitment and client relationships. Recent market activity has shown steadier price behavior compared with larger peers, supported by growth in client assets and continued advisor additions. The firm’s results reflect resilience in its core wealth management franchise amid varying market conditions. Performance has remained more measured than that of trading-heavy institutions, consistent with its business mix. Developments in recruiting and asset gathering have helped sustain sentiment in recent weeks.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots section that features selected AI trading bots from a broader library of hundreds of automated strategies. These bots cover thousands of tickers across equities, options, and other instruments, employing varied trading styles, timeframes, risk parameters, and performance statistics. Only those demonstrating suitability for prevailing market conditions appear in the trending section, providing users with data-driven options for strategy exploration. Available bots display ranges of historical metrics, including win rates, drawdowns, and return profiles, allowing comparison across different approaches. The platform supports diverse investor preferences through its selection of algorithmic tools.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Goldman Sachs (GS) and Raymond James Financial (RJF) differ substantially in scale and revenue composition. GS maintains a larger balance sheet and derives significant income from market-sensitive activities such as equities trading and mergers and acquisitions (M&A) advisory, exposing it to greater cyclicality. RJF centers on wealth management and private client services, generating more recurring fee-based revenue with lower direct trading exposure. Recent momentum has favored GS following strong earnings beats in trading segments, while RJF has emphasized stability and organic growth through advisor networks. Risk factors for GS include volatility in fixed-income and equities markets; for RJF, they center on interest-rate sensitivity and advisor retention. Sector exposure places both within financials, yet GS carries broader global investment banking reach, whereas RJF maintains a more U.S.-focused wealth platform. Market sentiment has reflected these contrasts, with trading-oriented names showing sharper reactions to macroeconomic data.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as earnings consistency, trend alignment following recent results, and positioning within active market segments, Tickeron’s AI models indicate a higher probability of favoring Goldman Sachs (GS) in the near term. Strong Q2 results and equities trading records provide measurable support relative to broader sector benchmarks. RJF presents a steadier profile suited to different risk tolerances. This assessment remains probabilistic and draws solely from publicly available performance indicators and sector dynamics.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a Buy and RJF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRJF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- RJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RJF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.89% price change this week, while RJF (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.77%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.26%.
Reported Earning Dates
GS is expected to report earnings on Oct 13, 2026.
RJF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.85% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Investment Managers (-3.17% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| GS | RJF | GS / RJF | |
| Capitalization | 317B | 31.9B | 994% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.451 | 4.565 | 514% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.60 | 14.48 | 115% |
| Revenue | 60.4B | 14.5B | 417% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 2.61B | - |
| Total Debt | 435B | 4.22B | 10,306% |
GS | RJF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 55 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RJF's Valuation (72) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (82). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as RJF (27). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.
GS's SMR Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as RJF (15). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.
RJF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (41). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.
GS's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as RJF (55). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.
| GS | RJF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 10 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
RJF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RJF has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RJF jumps, then SF could also see price increases.