Advertisement
GS vs RJF
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Raymond James Financial (RJF) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- GS has significantly outperformed RJF year-to-date (5.96% vs. 2.36%) and over the past year (73.09% vs. 14.68%), driven by robust trading revenues.
- Goldman Sachs reported record Q1 2026 equities trading revenues of $17.23 billion, beating estimates, while Raymond James beat Q2 estimates amid rising costs.
- GS trades at a higher P/E ratio (16.92) compared to RJF (14.70), reflecting stronger growth expectations.
- Raymond James benefits from steady wealth management growth via adviser recruiting and net new assets, offering lower volatility (beta 1.01 vs. GS's 1.31).
- Both firms show resilience in recent market activity, but GS demonstrates higher return on equity (14.59%).
Introduction
Goldman Sachs (GS) and Raymond James Financial (RJF) represent distinct approaches within the financial services sector: a global investment banking powerhouse versus a diversified firm focused on wealth management and capital markets. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, business models, and market positioning amid volatile conditions. Traders seeking high-momentum plays may eye GS, while investors prioritizing stability and dividends might prefer RJF. Understanding their relative strengths aids in portfolio diversification and sector rotation strategies in the current environment.
GS Overview and Recent Performance
Goldman Sachs (GS), a leading global investment bank, operates across investment banking, markets, consumer banking, and asset management. In recent quarters, the firm has benefited from elevated market volatility, particularly in equities trading. Q1 2026 results showcased record equities revenues contributing to $17.23 billion in net revenues and EPS of $17.55, surpassing estimates. The stock, trading around $927 with a market cap exceeding $275 billion, has gained over 73% in the past year, reflecting strong momentum. Sentiment has been bolstered by robust dealmaking recovery and fixed-income performance, though higher beta (1.31) exposes it to broader market swings. Recent weeks have seen upward price behavior amid positive analyst views on its trading franchise.
RJF Overview and Recent Performance
Raymond James Financial (RJF), a diversified financial services holding company, emphasizes wealth management, capital markets, and banking through its broker-dealer and bank subsidiaries. Recent Q2 earnings beat expectations with revenue growth of 13.4% year-over-year to $3.86 billion, driven by adviser recruiting and net new assets under management (AUM). Trading near $156 with a $30 billion market cap, the stock has risen 14.68% over the past year. Performance reflects steady client asset growth despite cost pressures from technology investments. Lower beta (1.01) underscores its defensive profile, with recent market activity supporting gains through resilient fee-based revenues and share repurchases.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of over 25 top-performing AI trading bots from its library of 351 total bots, each designed to trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. These bots employ varying approaches like trend-following, mean reversion, or momentum, displaying key stats such as win rates often exceeding 60%, profit factors above 1.5, and controlled max drawdowns. Only the most suitable for prevailing volatility and trends earn a spot here, helping traders identify high-confidence signals. Explore these bots to enhance your strategy with data-driven automation.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Goldman Sachs (GS) leans on volatile trading and investment banking (M&A advisory and underwriting), fueling higher growth but exposing it to economic cycles, unlike Raymond James Financial’s (RJF) stable wealth management (recurring fees from AUM) and retail brokerage. GS boasts superior revenue scale ($61.53B TTM) and net income ($17.06B), with stronger recent momentum from equities trading catalysts. RJF counters with lower valuation (P/E 14.70 vs. 16.92), dividend yield (1.39%), and risk via diversified sector exposure less tied to capital markets volatility. Sentiment favors GS for upside in bull markets, while RJF appeals for income and resilience amid uncertainty.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently favor GS over RJF, citing consistent upward trends, superior relative performance, and catalysts like record trading revenues. GS’s higher ROE and market positioning suggest greater probability of outperformance in the near term, though RJF’s stability could shine in downturns.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a Hold and RJF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileRJF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- RJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RJF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RJF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.32% price change this week, while RJF (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.85%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.30%.
Reported Earning Dates
GS is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.
RJF is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.59% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Investment Managers (+1.75% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| GS | RJF | GS / RJF | |
| Capitalization | 314B | 30.1B | 1,043% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.076 | -3.169 | -697% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.41 | 14.58 | 133% |
| Revenue | 60.4B | 14.5B | 417% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 2.61B | - |
| Total Debt | 435B | 4.22B | 10,306% |
GS | RJF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 47 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RJF's Valuation (68) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (83). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as RJF (33). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.
GS's SMR Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as RJF (15). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RJF (53). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than RJF’s over the last 12 months.
GS's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as RJF (50). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.
| GS | RJF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 9 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 59% |
Advertisement
GS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then MS could also see price increases.