Advertisement
GS vs RJF
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Raymond James Financial (RJF) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- GS has delivered stronger year-to-date gains of approximately 17-18% compared to RJF’s roughly 8-9%, reflecting broader market positioning in investment banking.
- Both stocks have experienced recent pullbacks, with GS down about 2% over the past month and RJF down 3-4%, amid sector volatility.
- GS maintains a significantly larger market capitalization of around $300 billion versus RJF’s approximately $33 billion, highlighting differences in scale and global reach.
- RJF shows more stability in recent quarters with consistent wealth management revenue growth, while GS benefits from diversified trading and advisory activities.
- Analyst sentiment remains generally constructive for both, with GS exhibiting higher volatility tied to capital markets activity.
- Relative performance favors GS on momentum metrics over the past year, though RJF offers a more defensive profile in wealth-focused segments.
Introduction
This comparison examines GS (The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.) and RJF (Raymond James Financial, Inc.), two financial services firms operating in capital markets and wealth management. The analysis focuses on recent market activity, business models, and relative positioning to assist traders and investors evaluating exposure within the sector. It is relevant for those seeking to understand performance contrasts between a large-scale global investment bank and a more regionally oriented wealth management and brokerage provider amid evolving interest rate and economic conditions.
GS Overview and Recent Performance
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. operates as a leading global investment bank offering securities trading, investment management, and advisory services. In recent weeks, GS shares have traded near $1,029, reflecting a modest decline of about 2% over the past month following a peak above $1,150 earlier in the summer. Year-to-date performance remains positive at approximately 17-18%, supported by strength in trading and advisory revenues. Market sentiment has been influenced by broader capital markets activity and expectations around monetary policy, with the stock showing resilience despite short-term volatility.
RJF Overview and Recent Performance
Raymond James Financial, Inc. focuses on wealth management, brokerage, and investment banking services primarily for individual and institutional clients. In recent weeks, RJF shares have hovered around $173, posting a decline of 3-4% over the past month after reaching highs near $183 in August. Year-to-date returns stand at approximately 8-9%, buoyed by steady growth in private client group revenues and assets under administration. Sentiment has remained supported by consistent operational execution in wealth segments, with limited impact from broader market swings compared to larger peers.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots optimized for prevailing market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers across varied strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles. Only the highest-performing and most suitable bots for current environments are featured in this section, with available statistics including win rates, profit factors, and drawdown metrics that typically range across diverse risk levels. These bots employ distinct trading styles and ticker sets to accommodate different investor preferences. For traders interested in automated strategies involving stocks like GS or RJF, reviewing the latest trends on the platform provides actionable insights.
Head-to-Head Comparison
GS operates a global, diversified model centered on investment banking, trading, and asset management, exposing it to higher cyclicality in capital markets activity. In contrast, RJF emphasizes wealth management and retail brokerage, providing more stable fee-based revenues less sensitive to trading volumes. Recent momentum has favored GS on a year-to-date basis, though both have faced similar near-term pressures from sector rotation. Risk factors include GS’s greater leverage to equity and fixed-income markets versus RJF’s focus on client assets. Market sentiment reflects GS’s larger scale and visibility, while RJF appeals to those prioritizing consistency in advisory-driven segments.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic edge to GS due to stronger year-to-date momentum and broader sector catalysts. However, RJF demonstrates greater stability in recent performance, suggesting it may suit lower-volatility preferences. This assessment remains conditional on evolving market data and does not constitute investment advice.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a Buy and RJF is a Buy.
GS | RJF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 4 | 9 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RJF's Valuation (68) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (71). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as RJF (31). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.
GS's SMR Rating (4) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as RJF (9). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as RJF (54). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.
RJF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (62). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.
| GS | RJF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 5 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 59% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while RJF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- RJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RJF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.70% price change this week, while RJF (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.33%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +3.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.75%.
Reported Earning Dates
GS is expected to report earnings on Oct 13, 2026.
RJF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.78% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Investment Managers (+3.58% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
Advertisement
GS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then MS could also see price increases.
RJF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RJF has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RJF jumps, then SF could also see price increases.