XYL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BOUT | XYL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 11 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 51% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BOUT and EEFT have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BOUT and EEFT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BOUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOUT | 100% | -0.61% | ||
| EEFT - BOUT | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.67% | ||
| TREX - BOUT | 14% Poorly correlated | -3.09% | ||
| FROG - BOUT | 13% Poorly correlated | +3.52% | ||
| XYL - BOUT | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.55% | ||
| ANET - BOUT | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.83% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XYL has been closely correlated with ZWS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XYL jumps, then ZWS could also see price increases.