BPOP
Price
$158.05
Change
+$1.53 (+0.98%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.13B
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HWC
Price
$73.11
Change
+$1.18 (+1.64%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.84B
18 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPOP vs HWC

BPOP vs HWC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPOP vs. HWC commentary
Oct 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPOP is a StrongBuy and HWC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPOP vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
BPOP
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8382
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1629
SMR RATING
1..100
911
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5420
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HWC's Valuation (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BPOP (52). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to BPOP’s over the last 12 months.

BPOP's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (29). This means that BPOP’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

BPOP's SMR Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (11). This means that BPOP’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BPOP (50). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to BPOP’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPOP (54). This means that HWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPOP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPOPHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 02, 2026
Stock price -- (BPOP: $156.52 vs. HWC: $71.93)
Brand notoriety: BPOP and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPOP: 122% vs. HWC: 108%
Market capitalization -- BPOP: $10.13B vs. HWC: $5.84B
BPOP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $10.13B. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPOP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while HWC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BPOP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the long-term than BPOP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPOP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPOP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPOP is a better buy in the short-term than HWC.

Price Growth

BPOP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.92% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

BPOP is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.07% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
BPOP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HWC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TPG44.730.60
+1.36%
TPG
NOVTU61.210.47
+0.77%
Novanta Inc.
FGC7.80N/A
N/A
FG Communities Holdings Inc
ENR21.21-0.18
-0.84%
Energizer Holdings
ZH3.52-0.05
-1.40%
Zhihu

BPOP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPOP has been closely correlated with FBP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BPOP jumps, then FBP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPOP
1D Price
Change %
BPOP100%
+0.69%
FBP - BPOP
86%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
FULT - BPOP
82%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
ONB - BPOP
80%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
AUB - BPOP
80%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
HWC - BPOP
80%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
More

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with FULT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then FULT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
-0.15%
FULT - HWC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
UCB - HWC
87%
Closely correlated
+1.26%
FNB - HWC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
ONB - HWC
87%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
UBSI - HWC
86%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
More