BQ
Price
$0.91
Change
-$0.02 (-2.15%)
Updated
Jun 23, 02:47 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.89M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TSCO
Price
$29.92
Change
+$0.11 (+0.37%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:19 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.63B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BQ vs TSCO

BQ vs TSCO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BQ vs. TSCO commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQ is a Hold and TSCO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (BQ: $0.93 vs. TSCO: $29.81)
Brand notoriety: BQ: Not notable vs. TSCO: Notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BQ: 5% vs. TSCO: 104%
Market capitalization -- BQ: $6.89M vs. TSCO: $15.63B
BQ [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $6.89M. TSCO’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $15.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $52.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTSCO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TSCO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TSCO is a better buy in the long-term than BQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BQ’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSCO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BQ’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TSCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BQ is a better buy in the short-term than TSCO.

Price Growth

BQ (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -2.39% price change this week, while TSCO (@Specialty Stores) price change was -3.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

TSCO is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-1.08% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSCO($15.6B) has a higher market cap than BQ($6.89M). TSCO YTD gains are higher at: -39.639 vs. BQ (-54.010). TSCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.95B vs. BQ (-38.14M). TSCO has higher revenues than BQ: TSCO (15.6B) vs BQ (469M).
BQTSCOBQ / TSCO
Capitalization6.89M15.6B0%
EBITDA-38.14M1.95B-2%
Gain YTD-54.010-39.639136%
P/E RatioN/A14.68-
Revenue469M15.6B3%
Total CashN/A224M-
Total DebtN/A6.41B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TSCO: Fundamental Ratings
TSCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90
SMR RATING
1..100
22
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BQTSCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TSCO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SQM78.65-1.04
-1.31%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
SIG86.73-1.50
-1.70%
Signet Jewelers Limited
HY38.54-0.76
-1.93%
Hyster-Yale Inc.
CYAB0.47-0.04
-7.80%
Cyabra Inc.
RDZN1.50-0.16
-9.64%
Roadzen

BQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BQ and SVV have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BQ and SVV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BQ
1D Price
Change %
BQ100%
-3.74%
SVV - BQ
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.02%
RDNW - BQ
22%
Poorly correlated
-14.08%
TSCO - BQ
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
KWY - BQ
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
UXIN - BQ
20%
Poorly correlated
-10.94%
More

TSCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSCO has been loosely correlated with CPRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TSCO jumps, then CPRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSCO
1D Price
Change %
TSCO100%
-1.42%
CPRT - TSCO
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.48%
HD - TSCO
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.29%
LOW - TSCO
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.51%
AZO - TSCO
41%
Loosely correlated
-3.77%
HNST - TSCO
39%
Loosely correlated
-7.96%
More