CAMX
Price
$34.45
Change
-$0.43 (-1.23%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Net Assets
57.25M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VLUE
Price
$197.11
Change
-$7.06 (-3.46%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
15.08B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAMX vs VLUE

CAMX vs VLUE Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) vs. iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE)

Key Takeaways

  • Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) is an actively managed, concentrated value strategy with approximately 30 holdings, while iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) is a passive ETF tracking the MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index with roughly 150 holdings.
  • CAMX carries a higher expense ratio of 0.59% compared to VLUE’s 0.15%, reflecting its active management approach versus VLUE’s rules-based index methodology.
  • CAMX emphasizes high-conviction value opportunities across a limited number of positions, potentially leading to higher volatility and idiosyncratic risk, whereas VLUE offers broader diversification within large- and mid-cap U.S. value stocks.
  • VLUE exhibits significant exposure to the Information Technology sector, while CAMX maintains a more flexible sector allocation driven by Cambiar’s Quality, Price, Discipline (QPD) framework.
  • Both ETFs target value-oriented U.S. equities but differ in cost structure, concentration, and implementation, making them suitable for distinct investor preferences regarding active versus passive exposure.
  • Structural differences in holdings count, expense ratios, and management style position the two ETFs as complementary rather than direct competitors within the value equity category.

Introduction

Investors seeking value exposure within U.S. equities often evaluate options that balance cost, diversification, and active insight. Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) represent two distinct approaches to value investing: one actively managed and concentrated, the other passively tracking an enhanced value index. These ETFs do not compete head-to-head but instead offer alternative strategies for investors pursuing undervalued large- and mid-cap stocks, allowing comparison of active conviction versus systematic factor exposure in the current market environment.

Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) Overview

Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund launched in February 2023 that employs Cambiar’s Quality, Price, Discipline (QPD) approach to identify undervalued companies with strong fundamentals. The ETF maintains a concentrated portfolio of approximately 30 holdings and does not track a specific index. Top positions typically include companies such as Uber Technologies, Honeywell International, Delta Air Lines, Elevance Health, and Airbus. Sector allocations are flexible and driven by bottom-up security selection rather than benchmark constraints. The expense ratio stands at 0.59%. As a non-diversified fund, CAMX emphasizes high-conviction ideas, which can result in elevated tracking error relative to broad value benchmarks and greater sensitivity to individual security outcomes.

iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) Overview

iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) is a passively managed ETF that seeks to track the MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index, which selects large- and mid-capitalization U.S. stocks exhibiting value characteristics such as low price-to-book, price-to-earnings, and price-to-cash-flow ratios. The fund holds approximately 150 securities and maintains quarterly rebalancing to align with the index. Prominent holdings often include names such as Micron Technology, Intel, Cisco Systems, Applied Materials, and General Motors. Sector exposure frequently shows elevated weighting in Information Technology alongside Financials and Consumer Discretionary. VLUE features a low expense ratio of 0.15% and provides systematic, rules-based exposure to the value factor across a diversified set of holdings.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The U.S. value equity segment continues to attract attention amid ongoing sector rotation, evolving interest-rate expectations, and corporate earnings cycles. Value strategies generally benefit from environments where economic growth stabilizes and traditional valuation metrics regain prominence. Both ETFs operate within the large- and mid-cap value space, where capital flows can shift between growth and value styles depending on macroeconomic conditions. Regulatory developments around corporate taxation and capital allocation, combined with commodity price trends and geopolitical factors, influence the relative attractiveness of value-oriented holdings. Sector risks include potential concentration in cyclical industries and sensitivity to changes in discount rates.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) has demonstrated performance driven by its concentrated active bets and security selection within the value universe, which can lead to periods of outperformance or underperformance relative to broader benchmarks depending on the success of individual holdings. iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has reflected the systematic capture of value characteristics across a wider range of stocks, with positioning that typically emphasizes lower-valuation names within Information Technology and other sectors. Relative volatility differences arise from CAMX’s higher concentration versus VLUE’s broader diversification, influencing how each responds to sector rotation, earnings surprises among top holdings, and shifts in interest-rate expectations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like CAMX and VLUE may find the platform useful for exploring additional opportunities aligned with their criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest probabilistic preference to iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) in the current environment. The ETF’s significantly lower expense ratio, greater diversification across approximately 150 holdings, and rules-based methodology provide a more efficient and lower-risk profile for broad value exposure compared with the higher-cost, concentrated active approach of Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX). While CAMX offers potential for differentiated alpha through active selection, VLUE’s cost efficiency and systematic factor implementation present a stronger combination of durability and risk-adjusted characteristics under prevailing market conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CAMX vs. VLUE commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAMX is a Hold and VLUE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VLUE has more net assets: 15.1B vs. CAMX (57.2M). VLUE has a higher annual dividend yield than CAMX: VLUE (45.296) vs CAMX (9.319). CAMX was incepted earlier than VLUE: CAMX (19 years) vs VLUE (13 years). CAMX has a higher turnover VLUE (30.00) vs VLUE (30.00).
CAMXVLUECAMX / VLUE
Gain YTD9.31945.29621%
Net Assets57.2M15.1B0%
Total Expense RatioN/A0.15-
Turnover70.0030.00233%
Yield0.501.4335%
Fund Existence19 years13 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAMXVLUE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAMX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VLUE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MYCJ24.620.03
+0.12%
State Street® My2030 Corporate Bond ETF
VNLA49.010.02
+0.04%
Janus Henderson Short Duration Inc ETF
SCOW21.070.01
+0.04%
Pacer S&P SmCp 600 Qul FCF Aristcrts ETF
CEMB45.53-0.11
-0.24%
iShares JP Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF
LEAD87.92-2.49
-2.75%
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF

CAMX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAMX has been closely correlated with TEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAMX jumps, then TEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAMX
1D Price
Change %
CAMX100%
N/A
TEL - CAMX
67%
Closely correlated
-4.53%
GS - CAMX
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
PPG - CAMX
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
AXP - CAMX
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
SHEL - CAMX
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
More

VLUE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VLUE has been closely correlated with MU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VLUE jumps, then MU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLUE
1D Price
Change %
VLUE100%
-3.46%
MU - VLUE
74%
Closely correlated
-13.18%
IVZ - VLUE
70%
Closely correlated
-6.12%
LNC - VLUE
70%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
PFG - VLUE
68%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
MS - VLUE
68%
Closely correlated
-0.47%
More