Advertisement
CARS vs MUSA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CARS is a Hold and MUSA is a Hold.
| CARS | MUSA | CARS / MUSA | |
| Capitalization | 596M | 9.67B | 6% |
| EBITDA | 158M | 1.21B | 13% |
| Gain YTD | -8.689 | 30.884 | -28% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.54 | 16.09 | 121% |
| Revenue | 726M | 21.5B | 3% |
| Total Cash | 33.3M | 175M | 19% |
| Total Debt | 447M | 2.74B | 16% |
CARS | MUSA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CARS's Valuation (70) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as MUSA (79) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CARS’s stock grew similarly to MUSA’s over the last 12 months.
MUSA's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for CARS (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that MUSA’s stock grew significantly faster than CARS’s over the last 12 months.
MUSA's SMR Rating (15) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CARS (78) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that MUSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CARS’s over the last 12 months.
CARS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as MUSA (49) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CARS’s stock grew similarly to MUSA’s over the last 12 months.
MUSA's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as CARS (53) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that MUSA’s stock grew similarly to CARS’s over the last 12 months.
| CARS | MUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 55% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CARS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while MUSA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CARS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MUSA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CARS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUSA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CARS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MUSA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CARS (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а -4.05% price change this week, while MUSA (@Specialty Stores) price change was +0.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.29%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
CARS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
MUSA is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Software/Services (-0.98% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
@Specialty Stores (-2.51% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
Advertisement
CARS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CARS has been loosely correlated with ARKO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CARS jumps, then ARKO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CARS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARS | 100% | -1.85% | ||
| ARKO - CARS | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.76% | ||
| ARHS - CARS | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.64% | ||
| HNST - CARS | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| CPRT - CARS | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.28% | ||
| PAG - CARS | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
More | ||||
MUSA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUSA has been loosely correlated with CASY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MUSA jumps, then CASY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MUSA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUSA | 100% | +0.62% | ||
| CASY - MUSA | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| ORLY - MUSA | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| AZO - MUSA | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
| CARS - MUSA | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.85% | ||
| SAH - MUSA | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.47% | ||
More | ||||