Advertisement
AZO vs MUSA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZO is a Hold and MUSA is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AZO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMUSA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- AZO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MUSA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AZO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUSA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AZO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MUSA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AZO (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -2.92% price change this week, while MUSA (@Specialty Stores) price change was -0.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.73%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -5.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
AZO is expected to report earnings on Sep 29, 2026.
MUSA is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.88% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
@Specialty Stores (-5.36% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| AZO | MUSA | AZO / MUSA | |
| Capitalization | 48.3B | 11.3B | 427% |
| EBITDA | 4.28B | 1.12B | 382% |
| Gain YTD | -12.799 | 52.370 | -24% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.34 | 21.33 | 95% |
| Revenue | 20B | 19.7B | 102% |
| Total Cash | 285M | 119M | 239% |
| Total Debt | 12.4B | 2.69B | 461% |
AZO | MUSA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MUSA's Valuation (83) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as AZO (87). This means that MUSA’s stock grew similarly to AZO’s over the last 12 months.
MUSA's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as AZO (47). This means that MUSA’s stock grew similarly to AZO’s over the last 12 months.
MUSA's SMR Rating (15) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for AZO (100). This means that MUSA’s stock grew significantly faster than AZO’s over the last 12 months.
MUSA's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as AZO (63). This means that MUSA’s stock grew similarly to AZO’s over the last 12 months.
MUSA's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AZO (74). This means that MUSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than AZO’s over the last 12 months.
| AZO | MUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | about 1 month ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | N/A |
Advertisement
AZO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AZO has been closely correlated with ORLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AZO jumps, then ORLY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AZO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZO | 100% | +1.16% | ||
| ORLY - AZO | 79% Closely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| AAP - AZO | 45% Loosely correlated | +4.46% | ||
| GPC - AZO | 37% Loosely correlated | +3.47% | ||
| TSCO - AZO | 34% Loosely correlated | +2.31% | ||
| MUSA - AZO | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.54% | ||
More | ||||
MUSA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUSA has been loosely correlated with CASY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MUSA jumps, then CASY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MUSA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUSA | 100% | -1.54% | ||
| CASY - MUSA | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| ORLY - MUSA | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| AZO - MUSA | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.16% | ||
| CARS - MUSA | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
| SAH - MUSA | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.72% | ||
More | ||||