CATY
Price
$64.09
Change
-$0.26 (-0.40%)
Updated
Aug 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.3B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFBS
Price
$90.45
Change
-$0.42 (-0.46%)
Updated
Aug 5, 04:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.97B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CATY vs SFBS

CATY vs SFBS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 26, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) vs. ServisFirst Bancshares (SFBS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) and ServisFirst Bancshares (SFBS) are both well-capitalized regional banks, but they serve different geographic footprints and customer bases, creating distinct growth profiles.
  • CATY has delivered stronger year-to-date price appreciation of approximately 32%, outpacing SFBS's roughly 24% gain, though both have significantly outperformed the broader market.
  • SFBS leads on profitability metrics, with a return on average assets (ROAA) of 1.91% and return on average common equity (ROCE) of 17.71%, compared to CATY's 1.52% and 12.21%, respectively.
  • CATY trades at a notably lower valuation multiple — a trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 12.8 versus SFBS's 14.9 — and offers a higher dividend yield of around 2.5% compared to SFBS's 1.7%.
  • SFBS posted explosive annualized loan growth of over 15% in its most recent quarter, whereas CATY's loan growth has been more measured at 2.2% quarter-over-quarter, reflecting different strategic priorities.
  • Both banks are expanding their net interest margins (NIM), but SFBS holds a wider absolute margin at 3.63% versus CATY's 3.48%, and operates with a significantly lower efficiency ratio below 30%.

Introduction

Regional banks have re-emerged as a focal point for investors navigating the current interest rate environment, and two mid-cap names drawing attention are CATY (Cathay General Bancorp) and SFBS (ServisFirst Bancshares). Both institutions operate in the regional banking space and share similar market capitalizations in the $4–5 billion range, yet they differ substantially in geographic focus, growth trajectory, and profitability profile. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for investors evaluating regional bank exposure through the lens of margin expansion, credit discipline, and capital return. Understanding how these two banks stack up against each other can help clarify which positioning may better align with an investor's objectives in the current market environment.

CATY Overview and Recent Performance

Cathay General Bancorp, headquartered in Los Angeles, California, is the holding company for Cathay Bank, one of the oldest and largest Asian-American banks in the United States. Founded in 1962, the bank operates over 60 branches across nine states — including California, New York, Texas, and Illinois — and maintains an international presence with a branch in Hong Kong and representative offices in Beijing, Shanghai, and Taipei. The institution serves a diverse client base of individuals, professionals, and small to mid-sized businesses with a full suite of commercial banking, trade finance, and wealth management services.

In recent weeks, CATY has demonstrated steady operational momentum. The company reported second-quarter net income of $92.2 million, or $1.37 per diluted share, surpassing consensus estimates. Net interest margin expanded to 3.48%, marking the eighth consecutive quarter of NIM improvement — a reflection of disciplined deposit cost management and proactive securities portfolio repositioning. Total loans reached $20.62 billion, while deposits grew to $21.06 billion. The board also increased the share repurchase authorization from $150 million to $200 million and authorized the redemption of approximately $54.1 million in higher-cost trust-preferred securities. Credit quality remained strong, with net charge-offs declining and criticized loans improving by $103 million during the quarter. Management has guided toward full-year loan growth of 3.5% to 4.5% and maintained a NIM target of 3.4% to 3.5%.

SFBS Overview and Recent Performance

ServisFirst Bancshares, based in Birmingham, Alabama, is the parent company of ServisFirst Bank. Founded in 2005, the bank has grown rapidly by focusing on relationship-based commercial banking for small and mid-sized businesses, professionals, and entrepreneurs. Its footprint spans Alabama, Florida, Georgia, the Carolinas, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia. The company differentiates itself through a decentralized regional model that emphasizes local decision-making and customer service — a philosophy reflected in its name.

Recent market activity has highlighted SFBS's accelerating momentum. The company reported second-quarter net income of $85.8 million, or $1.57 per diluted share, representing a 40% year-over-year increase. The standout metric was loan growth: ending loans surged $533 million from the prior quarter, equivalent to a 15.3% annualized rate, with management describing demand as broad-based across nearly all of its 13 regions. Net interest margin expanded to 3.63%, up 53 basis points from the prior year. The bank's efficiency ratio remained below 30% for the third consecutive quarter — an exceptional figure in regional banking. Non-interest-bearing deposits grew at a 20% annualized pace, underscoring the strength of the bank's treasury management relationships. Return on average assets reached 1.91% and return on average common equity hit 17.71%, cementing SFBS's position as one of the more profitable institutions in its peer group.

Trending AI Robots

For investors seeking a data-driven edge in navigating comparisons like this, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and risk profiles. However, only a select group earns a place in the Trending AI Robots section — those that have demonstrated the strongest alignment with current market conditions. These bots employ a range of approaches, from swing trading and trend following to momentum and mean-reversion strategies, and track performance statistics including win rates, trade counts, and return profiles. While individual bot performance varies, the curated list consistently features bots with win rates that can reach 70% or higher, depending on the strategy and market environment. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help traders identify systematic approaches that complement their own research process.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While both CATY and SFBS operate as regional banks, their business models reveal meaningful contrasts. CATY's larger balance sheet — approximately $24 billion in total assets versus SFBS's $18.3 billion — reflects its longer operating history and broader geographic footprint. However, SFBS punches above its weight in profitability, with return metrics that substantially exceed CATY's: ROAA of 1.91% versus 1.52%, and ROCE of 17.71% versus 12.21%. SFBS's efficiency ratio below 30% also stands in stark contrast to CATY's adjusted efficiency ratio of roughly 37%, indicating a leaner operating model.

On valuation, the picture flips. CATY trades at a trailing P/E of approximately 12.8, a discount to SFBS's roughly 14.9 multiple. CATY's price-to-book ratio of around 1.35 also undercuts SFBS's 2.42, suggesting a more conservative market valuation. Income-oriented investors may appreciate CATY's dividend yield of roughly 2.5%, compared to SFBS's 1.7%. Both companies carry identical betas of approximately 0.86, indicating similar sensitivity to broader market movements.

Growth dynamics further distinguish these two names. SFBS has captured attention with its explosive loan growth — more than 15% annualized — driven by broad demand across its Sunbelt markets. CATY's loan growth has been more deliberate at roughly 2.2% quarter-over-quarter, as management has prioritized credit quality and relationship depth over volume in a period of geopolitical uncertainty. On the margin front, both banks are expanding NIM, but SFBS enjoys a wider absolute spread (3.63% vs. 3.48%) and a lower cost of interest-bearing deposits. Risk considerations also differ: CATY carries higher commercial real estate exposure given its California concentration, while SFBS's rapid growth and CRE concentration ratio slightly above 300% warrant monitoring as regulatory scrutiny of commercial real estate portfolios continues.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, profitability momentum, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely express a near-term preference for SFBS over CATY. The analysis hinges on several converging signals: SFBS's accelerating loan growth, superior return on assets and equity, industry-leading efficiency ratio, and expanding net interest margin create a powerful combination of fundamental momentum. While CATY offers compelling value characteristics — including a lower P/E multiple, higher dividend yield, and consistent margin expansion of its own — the AI's probabilistic models tend to favor stocks exhibiting stronger trend consistency across multiple timeframes. SFBS's record loan pipeline, broad-based regional demand, and sustained sub-30% efficiency ratio suggest durable operating leverage that may continue to translate into earnings outperformance. CATY remains a fundamentally sound institution with disciplined capital management, but in a direct comparison of current trend strength and growth catalysts, the weight of evidence tilts toward SFBS. This assessment reflects a probabilistic evaluation of observable data and should be understood as one analytical input among many, not a definitive forecast.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CATY vs. SFBS commentary
Aug 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CATY is a StrongBuy and SFBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 05, 2026
Stock price -- (CATY: $64.35 vs. SFBS: $90.88)
Brand notoriety: CATY and SFBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CATY: 50% vs. SFBS: 74%
Market capitalization -- CATY: $4.3B vs. SFBS: $4.97B
CATY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.3B. SFBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CATY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CATY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CATY is a better buy in the long-term than SFBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CATY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CATY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CATY and SFBS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CATY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.26% price change this week, while SFBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

CATY is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

SFBS is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.15% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFBS($4.97B) has a higher market cap than CATY($4.3B). SFBS has higher P/E ratio than CATY: SFBS (15.48) vs CATY (12.59). CATY YTD gains are higher at: 34.842 vs. SFBS (28.495). CATY has more cash in the bank: 146M vs. SFBS (101M). SFBS has less debt than CATY: SFBS (34.8M) vs CATY (169M). CATY has higher revenues than SFBS: CATY (845M) vs SFBS (583M).
CATYSFBSCATY / SFBS
Capitalization4.3B4.97B87%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD34.84228.495122%
P/E Ratio12.5915.4881%
Revenue845M583M145%
Total Cash146M101M145%
Total Debt169M34.8M486%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CATY vs SFBS: Fundamental Ratings
CATY
SFBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8535
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2566
SMR RATING
1..100
3232
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4246
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3662
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CATY's Valuation (64) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBS (92). This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFBS (66). This means that CATY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's SMR Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBS (32). This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBS (46). This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBS (62). This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CATYSFBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CATY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XCLR28.190.79
+2.88%
Global X S&P 500® Collar 95-110 ETF
SPTM93.671.65
+1.79%
State StreetSPDRPortS&P1500CompStkMktETF
NIM9.300.10
+1.09%
Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund
IBTL20.020.07
+0.33%
iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Tr ETF
CBXA21.41N/A
N/A
Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April

SFBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFBS has been closely correlated with SFNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFBS jumps, then SFNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBS
1D Price
Change %
SFBS100%
+0.98%
SFNC - SFBS
82%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
UBSI - SFBS
82%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
TRMK - SFBS
81%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
CATY - SFBS
80%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
UCB - SFBS
79%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
More