CAVA
Price
$68.21
Change
+$0.47 (+0.69%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
7.91B
74 days until earnings call
SG
Price
$9.26
Change
+$0.22 (+2.43%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
1.09B
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAVA vs SG

Header iconCAVA vs SG Comparison
Open Charts CAVA vs SGBanner chart's image
CAVA Group
Price$68.21
Change+$0.47 (+0.69%)
Volume$2.14M
Capitalization7.91B
Sweetgreen
Price$9.26
Change+$0.22 (+2.43%)
Volume$3.98M
Capitalization1.09B
CAVA vs SG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAVA vs. SG commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAVA is a Buy and SG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CAVA: $68.21 vs. SG: $9.26)
Brand notoriety: CAVA and SG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAVA: 41% vs. SG: 64%
Market capitalization -- CAVA: $7.91B vs. SG: $1.09B
CAVA [@Restaurants] is valued at $7.91B. SG’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $222.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CAVA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CAVA and SG are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAVA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAVA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SG is a better buy in the short-term than CAVA.

Price Growth

CAVA (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.31% price change this week, while SG (@Restaurants) price change was +3.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAVA is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

SG is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.63% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAVA($7.91B) has a higher market cap than SG($1.1B). CAVA YTD gains are higher at: -39.530 vs. SG (-71.117). CAVA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 141M vs. SG (-29.06M). CAVA has more cash in the bank: 386M vs. SG (168M). SG has less debt than CAVA: SG (339M) vs CAVA (434M). CAVA has higher revenues than SG: CAVA (1.08B) vs SG (686M).
CAVASGCAVA / SG
Capitalization7.91B1.1B722%
EBITDA141M-29.06M-485%
Gain YTD-39.530-71.11756%
P/E Ratio57.81N/A-
Revenue1.08B686M158%
Total Cash386M168M230%
Total Debt434M339M128%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SG: Fundamental Ratings
SG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAVASG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RFNHX90.670.54
+0.60%
American Funds Fundamental Invs R5E
CTCAX99.60N/A
N/A
Columbia Global Technology Growth A
FLDFX13.33N/A
N/A
Meeder Balanced Retail
PINTX11.61N/A
N/A
Principal Overseas R3
JACDX10.59N/A
N/A
JHancock Global Environmental Opps R6

CAVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAVA has been loosely correlated with SHAK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAVA jumps, then SHAK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAVA
1D Price
Change %
CAVA100%
+0.69%
SHAK - CAVA
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
SG - CAVA
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.43%
KRUS - CAVA
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.51%
EAT - CAVA
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
BROS - CAVA
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
More

SG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SG has been loosely correlated with CAVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SG jumps, then CAVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SG
1D Price
Change %
SG100%
+2.43%
CAVA - SG
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
CMG - SG
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
FRSH - SG
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
KRUS - SG
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.51%
SHAK - SG
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
More