Advertisement
CBOE vs FDS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBOE is a StrongBuy and FDS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBOE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFDS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CBOE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- FDS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBOE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FDS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CBOE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- FDS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CBOE (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +1.51% price change this week, while FDS (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +3.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.26%.
Reported Earning Dates
CBOE is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2026.
FDS is expected to report earnings on Dec 18, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Publishing/Services (+1.79% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
| CBOE | FDS | CBOE / FDS | |
| Capitalization | 27B | 10.4B | 260% |
| EBITDA | 1.57B | 966M | 163% |
| Gain YTD | 33.276 | -41.800 | -80% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.75 | 17.84 | 156% |
| Revenue | 4.62B | 2.32B | 199% |
| Total Cash | 1.53B | 355M | 431% |
| Total Debt | 1.6B | 1.56B | 102% |
CBOE | FDS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FDS's Valuation (31) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBOE (74) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBOE’s over the last 12 months.
CBOE's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for FDS (100) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that CBOE’s stock grew significantly faster than FDS’s over the last 12 months.
FDS's SMR Rating (33) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as CBOE (41) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to CBOE’s over the last 12 months.
CBOE's Price Growth Rating (28) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDS (65) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that CBOE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDS’s over the last 12 months.
CBOE's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDS (93) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that CBOE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDS’s over the last 12 months.
| CBOE | FDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 38% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 38% | 1 day ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 7 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 33% | 9 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 29% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RVNL | 40.79 | 3.10 | +8.23% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF | |||
| CBXJ | 24.13 | 0.23 | +0.95% |
| Calamos Bitcoin 90 Str Alt Prt ETF-Jan | |||
| FREL | 27.63 | 0.11 | +0.40% |
| Fidelity MSCI Real Estate ETF | |||
| OVT | 22.33 | 0.04 | +0.17% |
| Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF | |||
| SHYL | 45.18 | 0.04 | +0.10% |
| Xtrackers Short Duration High Yld Bd ETF | |||
FDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been closely correlated with MORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then MORN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDS | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| MORN - FDS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| SPGI - FDS | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| MCO - FDS | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| NDAQ - FDS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| ICE - FDS | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
More | ||||