FDS
Price
$446.21
Change
-$3.77 (-0.84%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
16.87B
75 days until earnings call
MORN
Price
$293.95
Change
-$5.93 (-1.98%)
Updated
Jul 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.18B
19 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDS vs MORN

Header iconFDS vs MORN Comparison
Open Charts FDS vs MORNBanner chart's image
Factset Research Systems
Price$446.21
Change-$3.77 (-0.84%)
Volume$232.22K
Capitalization16.87B
Morningstar
Price$293.95
Change-$5.93 (-1.98%)
Volume$2.44K
Capitalization13.18B
FDS vs MORN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MORN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDS vs. MORN commentary
Jul 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDS is a Buy and MORN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 12, 2025
Stock price -- (FDS: $446.21 vs. MORN: $299.00)
Brand notoriety: FDS and MORN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDS: 65% vs. MORN: 149%
Market capitalization -- FDS: $16.87B vs. MORN: $13.18B
FDS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $16.87B. MORN’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $13.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMORN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MORN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FDS and MORN are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDS’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MORN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MORN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the short-term than MORN.

Price Growth

FDS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.39% price change this week, while MORN (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -3.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDS is expected to report earnings on Sep 25, 2025.

MORN is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.41% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDS($16.9B) has a higher market cap than MORN($13.2B). MORN has higher P/E ratio than FDS: MORN (93.13) vs FDS (35.83). FDS YTD gains are higher at: -6.660 vs. MORN (-10.952). FDS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 805M vs. MORN (427M). MORN has more cash in the bank: 389M vs. FDS (28.4M). MORN has less debt than FDS: MORN (1.16B) vs FDS (1.77B). FDS (2.12B) and MORN (2.04B) have equivalent revenues.
FDSMORNFDS / MORN
Capitalization16.9B13.2B128%
EBITDA805M427M189%
Gain YTD-6.660-10.95261%
P/E Ratio35.8393.1338%
Revenue2.12B2.04B104%
Total Cash28.4M389M7%
Total Debt1.77B1.16B153%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDS vs MORN: Fundamental Ratings
FDS
MORN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
236
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3444
SMR RATING
1..100
3438
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5358
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5193
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MORN's Valuation (53) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDS (91). This means that MORN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDS’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MORN (44). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's SMR Rating (34) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MORN (38). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MORN (58). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MORN (93). This means that FDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MORN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDSMORN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MORN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WEBS22.030.48
+2.23%
Direxion Daily Dow Jones Int Br 3X ETF
ENFR31.580.13
+0.41%
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
TXUG24.97N/A
N/A
Thornburg International Growth ETF
VETZ19.73-0.06
-0.28%
Academy Veteran Impact ETF
EWL54.70-0.75
-1.35%
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF

FDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been closely correlated with MORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then MORN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDS
1D Price
Change %
FDS100%
-0.84%
MORN - FDS
67%
Closely correlated
-1.56%
MCO - FDS
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
SPGI - FDS
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
NDAQ - FDS
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
MSCI - FDS
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.60%
More

MORN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MORN has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MORN jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MORN
1D Price
Change %
MORN100%
-0.29%
MCO - MORN
75%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
NDAQ - MORN
74%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
SPGI - MORN
72%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
MSCI - MORN
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
JEF - MORN
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
More