It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FDS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMORN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FDS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MORN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
FDS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.04% price change this week, while MORN (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +6.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.15%.
FDS is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2024.
MORN is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
FDS | MORN | FDS / MORN | |
Capitalization | 16.9B | 13.2B | 128% |
EBITDA | 805M | 427M | 189% |
Gain YTD | -3.553 | 19.458 | -18% |
P/E Ratio | 35.83 | 93.13 | 38% |
Revenue | 2.12B | 2.04B | 104% |
Total Cash | 28.4M | 389M | 7% |
Total Debt | 1.77B | 1.16B | 153% |
FDS | MORN | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MORN's Valuation (85) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (93). This means that MORN’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.
FDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MORN (30). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.
FDS's SMR Rating (35) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MORN (51). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.
FDS's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MORN (42). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.
FDS's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MORN (100). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.
FDS | MORN | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago36% | 4 days ago47% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | 4 days ago59% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago38% | 4 days ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago37% | 4 days ago74% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago45% | 4 days ago66% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago62% | 4 days ago67% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago61% | 6 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago47% | 20 days ago53% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago55% | 4 days ago55% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago64% | 4 days ago56% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been loosely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FDS | 100% | +0.61% | ||
SPGI - FDS | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.34% | ||
MORN - FDS | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.79% | ||
MSCI - FDS | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
MCO - FDS | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
NDAQ - FDS | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MORN has been loosely correlated with NDAQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MORN jumps, then NDAQ could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MORN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MORN | 100% | +1.79% | ||
NDAQ - MORN | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
RJF - MORN | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.53% | ||
MCO - MORN | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
HLI - MORN | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.00% | ||
SPGI - MORN | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.34% | ||
More |