FDS
Price
$453.98
Change
+$6.27 (+1.40%)
Updated
Mar 28, 2:04 PM EST
89 days until earnings call
NDAQ
Price
$63.10
Change
+$0.10 (+0.16%)
Updated
Mar 28, 6:59 PM EST
20 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Analysis and predictions FDS vs NDAQ

Header iconFDS vs NDAQ Comparison
Open Charts FDS vs NDAQBanner chart's image
Factset Research Systems
Price$453.98
Change+$6.27 (+1.40%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Nasdaq
Price$63.10
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
Volume$1.73M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FDS vs NDAQ Comparison Chart

Loading...

FDSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
NDAQDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
FDS vs. NDAQ commentary
Mar 28, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDS is a StrongBuy and NDAQ is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 28, 2024
Stock price -- (FDS: $454.17 vs. NDAQ: $63.10)
Brand notoriety: FDS and NDAQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDS: 47% vs. NDAQ: 54%
Market capitalization -- FDS: $17.04B vs. NDAQ: $36.27B
FDS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $17.04B. NDAQ’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $36.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NDAQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FDS and NDAQ are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NDAQ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NDAQ is a better buy in the short-term than FDS.

Price Growth

FDS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.78% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +2.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDS is expected to report earnings on Jun 25, 2024.

NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.04% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FDS with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for NDAQ with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NDAQ($36.3B) has a higher market cap than FDS($17B). FDS has higher P/E ratio than NDAQ: FDS (36.20) vs NDAQ (30.29). NDAQ YTD gains are higher at: 8.760 vs. FDS (-6.020). NDAQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2B vs. FDS (805M). NDAQ has more cash in the bank: 641M vs. FDS (28.4M). FDS has less debt than NDAQ: FDS (1.77B) vs NDAQ (10.9B). NDAQ has higher revenues than FDS: NDAQ (6.06B) vs FDS (2.12B).
FDSNDAQFDS / NDAQ
Capitalization17B36.3B47%
EBITDA805M2B40%
Gain YTD-6.0208.760-69%
P/E Ratio36.2030.29120%
Revenue2.12B6.06B35%
Total Cash28.4M641M4%
Total Debt1.77B10.9B16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDS vs NDAQ: Fundamental Ratings
FDS
NDAQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6814
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1614
SMR RATING
1..100
3464
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5720
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6136
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NDAQ's Valuation (90) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FDS (93) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FDS (16) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's SMR Rating (34) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as NDAQ (64) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (20) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDS (57) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDS’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FDS (61) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDSNDAQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FDSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
NDAQDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CERT17.620.46
+2.68%
Certara
SNA296.945.97
+2.05%
Snap-on
EGY6.870.11
+1.63%
Vaalco Energy
PXLW2.67N/A
N/A
Pixelworks
GRTX0.15-0.03
-17.07%
Galera Therapeutics

FDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been loosely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDS
1D Price
Change %
FDS100%
+0.79%
SPGI - FDS
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
MSCI - FDS
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
MCO - FDS
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
DNB - FDS
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.68%
EVR - FDS
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
More