Advertisement
CCG vs UPWK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCG is a Hold and UPWK is a Hold.
CCG's RSI Indicator ascending out of oversold territory
The RSI Indicator for CCG moved out of oversold territory on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 16 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 15 of the 16 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 20 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +14.12% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CCG advanced for three days, in 93 of 125 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
CCG may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 50-day moving average for CCG moved below the 200-day moving average on September 25, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CCG declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Aroon Indicator for CCG entered a downward trend on October 15, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 23 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.548) is normal, around the industry mean (1.332). P/E Ratio (1.614) is within average values for comparable stocks, (412.981). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (17.274). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.015) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.087) is also within normal values, averaging (71.888).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 35 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 93 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. CCG’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CCG’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock worse than average.
UPWK's MACD Histogram just turned positive
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for UPWK turned positive on October 05, 2026. Looking at past instances where UPWK's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 40 of 50 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 06, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on UPWK as a result. In 63 of 85 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
UPWK moved above its 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +0.46% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where UPWK advanced for three days, in 182 of 251 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 6 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where UPWK declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.
UPWK broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 08, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for UPWK entered a downward trend on October 07, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 45 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 52 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 57 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.649) is normal, around the industry mean (1.332). P/E Ratio (10.353) is within average values for comparable stocks, (412.981). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.853) is also within normal values, averaging (17.274). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.015) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.478) is also within normal values, averaging (71.888).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 75 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. UPWK’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. UPWK’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock worse than average.
UPWK | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CCG | UPWK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 23 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while UPWK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CCG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UPWK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UPWK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- UPWK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CCG (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а -2.72% price change this week, while UPWK (@Internet Software/Services) price change was +1.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.51%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCG is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2026.
UPWK is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Software/Services (-2.06% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
Advertisement
CCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CCG and UPXI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCG and UPXI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCG | 100% | +0.80% | ||
| UPXI - CCG | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.91% | ||
| WB - CCG | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.61% | ||
| SOGP - CCG | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| ZG - CCG | 21% Poorly correlated | +10.80% | ||
| UPWK - CCG | 20% Poorly correlated | +3.68% | ||
More | ||||
UPWK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UPWK has been loosely correlated with Z. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UPWK jumps, then Z could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UPWK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPWK | 100% | +3.68% | ||
| Z - UPWK | 39% Loosely correlated | +11.05% | ||
| CARG - UPWK | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| ZG - UPWK | 38% Loosely correlated | +10.80% | ||
| NRDS - UPWK | 33% Poorly correlated | +5.03% | ||
| YELP - UPWK | 32% Poorly correlated | +4.94% | ||
More | ||||