Advertisement
CCG vs WB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCG is a StrongBuy and WB is a Hold.
| CCG | WB | CCG / WB | |
| Capitalization | 40M | 1.62B | 2% |
| EBITDA | -34.27M | 604M | -6% |
| Gain YTD | -46.781 | -30.558 | 153% |
| P/E Ratio | 1.61 | 5.48 | 29% |
| Revenue | 2.55B | 1.79B | 142% |
| Total Cash | 132M | 2.64B | 5% |
| Total Debt | 102M | 1.87B | 5% |
WB | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CCG | WB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while WB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CCG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- WB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CCG (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а -4.03% price change this week, while WB (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -1.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -2.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCG is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2026.
WB is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Software/Services (-2.63% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UPSX | 10.98 | 0.41 | +3.90% |
| Tradr 2X Long UPST Daily ETF | |||
| BVAL | 31.97 | 0.27 | +0.85% |
| Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF | |||
| BTCI | 32.13 | 0.17 | +0.53% |
| NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | |||
| FLSW | 41.83 | 0.20 | +0.49% |
| Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | |||
| CPZ | 13.06 | 0.02 | +0.15% |
| Calamos Long/Short Equity & Dynamic Income Trust | |||
CCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CCG and UPXI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCG and UPXI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCG | 100% | +16.94% | ||
| UPXI - CCG | 25% Poorly correlated | +4.66% | ||
| ZG - CCG | 23% Poorly correlated | +4.23% | ||
| Z - CCG | 22% Poorly correlated | +4.00% | ||
| WB - CCG | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
| SOGP - CCG | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.61% | ||
More | ||||
WB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WB has been loosely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WB jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.