CCHBF
Price
$51.75
Change
+$0.92 (+1.81%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
19.59B
CELH
Price
$62.07
Change
+$0.12 (+0.19%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
16.01B
75 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCHBF vs CELH

Header iconCCHBF vs CELH Comparison
Open Charts CCHBF vs CELHBanner chart's image
COCA COLA HBC
Price$51.75
Change+$0.92 (+1.81%)
Volume$117
Capitalization19.59B
Celsius Holdings
Price$62.07
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
Volume$4.16M
Capitalization16.01B
CCHBF vs CELH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCHBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CELH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCHBF vs. CELH commentary
Aug 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCHBF is a StrongBuy and CELH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 22, 2025
Stock price -- (CCHBF: $51.75 vs. CELH: $62.07)
Brand notoriety: CCHBF and CELH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCHBF: 30% vs. CELH: 59%
Market capitalization -- CCHBF: $19.59B vs. CELH: $16.01B
CCHBF [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $19.59B. CELH’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $16.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $304.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $20.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCHBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCELH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCHBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CELH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCHBF is a better buy in the long-term than CELH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCHBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CELH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCHBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CELH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CELH is a better buy in the short-term than CCHBF.

Price Growth

CCHBF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +1.80% price change this week, while CELH (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +9.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

CELH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-1.55% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCHBF($19.6B) has a higher market cap than CELH($16B). CELH has higher P/E ratio than CCHBF: CELH (163.34) vs CCHBF (17.71). CELH YTD gains are higher at: 135.649 vs. CCHBF (53.333). CCHBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.62B vs. CELH (184M). CCHBF has more cash in the bank: 2.45B vs. CELH (615M). CELH has less debt than CCHBF: CELH (863M) vs CCHBF (3.98B). CCHBF has higher revenues than CELH: CCHBF (10.8B) vs CELH (1.67B).
CCHBFCELHCCHBF / CELH
Capitalization19.6B16B123%
EBITDA1.62B184M883%
Gain YTD53.333135.64939%
P/E Ratio17.71163.3411%
Revenue10.8B1.67B648%
Total Cash2.45B615M398%
Total Debt3.98B863M461%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCHBF vs CELH: Fundamental Ratings
CCHBF
CELH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9629
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3253
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
533
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCHBF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELH (94) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCHBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.

CCHBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as CELH (53) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCHBF’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.

CCHBF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CELH (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCHBF’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.

CELH's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCHBF (45) in the null industry. This means that CELH’s stock grew similarly to CCHBF’s over the last 12 months.

CELH's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCHBF (53) in the null industry. This means that CELH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCHBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCHBFCELH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
16%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
23%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCHBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CELH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPWO24.53-0.06
-0.24%
SP Funds S&P World ETF
ESIX30.61-0.08
-0.26%
SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF
MMD14.44-0.11
-0.76%
NYLI MacKay DefinedTerm Muni Opportunities Fund
CONY6.69-0.10
-1.42%
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
MUU20.59-0.55
-2.60%
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares

CCHBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCHBF and CELH have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCHBF and CELH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCHBF
1D Price
Change %
CCHBF100%
N/A
CELH - CCHBF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
CCOJY - CCHBF
0%
Poorly correlated
-6.26%
CCHGY - CCHBF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
KDP - CCHBF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
CCOJF - CCHBF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CELH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CELH has been loosely correlated with MNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CELH jumps, then MNST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELH
1D Price
Change %
CELH100%
+0.19%
MNST - CELH
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
KO - CELH
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
KDP - CELH
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
PEP - CELH
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
CCEP - CELH
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
More