Advertisement
CELH vs FIZZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELH is a Hold and FIZZ is a Hold.
CELH's MACD Histogram crosses above signal line
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CELH turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where CELH's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 42 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where CELH's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 20 of 32 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 15, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CELH as a result. In 67 of 82 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
Following a +3.75% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CELH advanced for three days, in 236 of 294 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 44 of 50 cases where CELH's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
The 10-day moving average for CELH crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 11, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 15 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CELH declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.
The Aroon Indicator for CELH entered a downward trend on October 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 72 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. CELH’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 75 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 82 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 98 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (5.946) is normal, around the industry mean (-3.963). CELH's P/E Ratio (122.565) is considerably higher than the industry average of (25.041). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.256) is also within normal values, averaging (3.732). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.040) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.408) is also within normal values, averaging (2.785).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CELH’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 73, placing this stock worse than average.
FIZZ in upward trend: 10-day moving average moved above 50-day moving average on October 16, 2026
The 10-day moving average for FIZZ crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 16, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 14 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on FIZZ as a result. In 58 of 83 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FIZZ just turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where FIZZ's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 31 of 43 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
FIZZ moved above its 50-day moving average on October 12, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +4.23% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FIZZ advanced for three days, in 168 of 280 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 125 of 211 cases where FIZZ Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 59%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 4 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FIZZ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
FIZZ broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 12 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (8.904) is normal, around the industry mean (-3.963). P/E Ratio (18.796) is within average values for comparable stocks, (25.041). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (4.032) is also within normal values, averaging (3.732). FIZZ's Dividend Yield (0.372) is considerably higher than the industry average of (0.040). P/S Ratio (2.554) is also within normal values, averaging (2.785).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 26 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 36 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 41 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. FIZZ’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FIZZ’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 73, placing this stock worse than average.
CELH | FIZZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | 26 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 48 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FIZZ's Valuation (12) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for CELH (98). This means that FIZZ’s stock grew significantly faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.
FIZZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CELH (100). This means that FIZZ’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.
FIZZ's SMR Rating (26) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELH (82). This means that FIZZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.
FIZZ's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CELH (72). This means that FIZZ’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.
FIZZ's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELH (75). This means that FIZZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.
| CELH | FIZZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 22 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 59% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CELH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while FIZZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CELH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FIZZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CELH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FIZZ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CELH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FIZZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CELH (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -1.36% price change this week, while FIZZ (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +14.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.38%.
Reported Earning Dates
CELH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
FIZZ is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-0.68% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EWZ | 41.83 | 0.25 | +0.60% |
| iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) | |||
| DAX | 44.29 | 0.05 | +0.12% |
| Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) | |||
| LTTI | 16.89 | N/A | N/A |
| FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF | |||
| WSGE | 28.04 | N/A | N/A |
| Warren Street Global Equity ETF | |||
| SFTX | 30.32 | -0.14 | -0.47% |
| Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX) | |||
CELH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CELH and KDP have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELH and KDP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CELH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CELH | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| KDP - CELH | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.29% | ||
| FIZZ - CELH | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.89% | ||
| CCEP - CELH | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.40% | ||
| PEP - CELH | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.42% | ||
| REED - CELH | 20% Poorly correlated | -12.65% | ||
More | ||||
FIZZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIZZ has been loosely correlated with KDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIZZ jumps, then KDP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIZZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIZZ | 100% | +1.89% | ||
| KDP - FIZZ | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| PEP - FIZZ | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.42% | ||
| CCEP - FIZZ | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.40% | ||
| COKE - FIZZ | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.83% | ||
| MNST - FIZZ | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.86% | ||
More | ||||