LHX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 21 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CCOR | LHX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 42% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 17 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 74% | 7 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 62% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CCOR and LHX have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCOR and LHX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCOR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCOR | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| LHX - CCOR | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.40% | ||
| WM - CCOR | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
| KMB - CCOR | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.74% | ||
| SYY - CCOR | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.57% | ||
| SO - CCOR | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LHX has been loosely correlated with NOC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LHX jumps, then NOC could also see price increases.