LHX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CCOR | LHX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 14 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 55% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CCOR and WM have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCOR and WM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCOR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCOR | 100% | +2.13% | ||
| WM - CCOR | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.82% | ||
| JNJ - CCOR | 26% Poorly correlated | +3.57% | ||
| LHX - CCOR | 26% Poorly correlated | +3.37% | ||
| PG - CCOR | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.70% | ||
| MCD - CCOR | 24% Poorly correlated | +4.16% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LHX has been loosely correlated with NOC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LHX jumps, then NOC could also see price increases.