CDNS
Price
$377.92
Change
-$6.25 (-1.63%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
104.24B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LIF
Price
$52.22
Change
-$2.35 (-4.31%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.23B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDNS vs LIF

CDNS vs LIF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNS vs. LIF commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNS is a Buy and LIF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (CDNS: $377.92 vs. LIF: $52.22)
Brand notoriety: CDNS and LIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNS: 37% vs. LIF: 33%
Market capitalization -- CDNS: $104.24B vs. LIF: $4.23B
CDNS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $104.24B. LIF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDNS is a better buy in the long-term than LIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDNS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDNS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LIF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDNS is a better buy in the short-term than LIF.

Price Growth

CDNS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.57% price change this week, while LIF (@Packaged Software) price change was -7.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

CDNS is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.

LIF is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.53% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNS($104B) has a higher market cap than LIF($4.23B). CDNS has higher P/E ratio than LIF: CDNS (88.09) vs LIF (29.84). CDNS YTD gains are higher at: 20.903 vs. LIF (-18.584). CDNS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.98B vs. LIF (25M). CDNS has more cash in the bank: 1.41B vs. LIF (457M). LIF has less debt than CDNS: LIF (311M) vs CDNS (3.08B). CDNS has higher revenues than LIF: CDNS (5.53B) vs LIF (529M).
CDNSLIFCDNS / LIF
Capitalization104B4.23B2,457%
EBITDA1.98B25M7,920%
Gain YTD20.903-18.584-112%
P/E Ratio88.0929.84295%
Revenue5.53B529M1,045%
Total Cash1.41B457M308%
Total Debt3.08B311M991%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNS: Fundamental Ratings
CDNS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
63
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18
SMR RATING
1..100
45
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDNSLIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDNS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VDC229.271.13
+0.50%
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
HIPS11.600.01
+0.09%
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF
BIS13.22N/A
N/A
ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotech
CHPX99.62N/A
N/A
Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF
FNGS75.12-0.38
-0.50%
MicroSectors™ FANG+™ ETN

CDNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDNS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNS
1D Price
Change %
CDNS100%
-1.63%
SNPS - CDNS
84%
Closely correlated
-2.62%
S - CDNS
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.75%
MSFT - CDNS
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.53%
ORCL - CDNS
58%
Loosely correlated
-6.47%
CRWD - CDNS
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
More

LIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIF has been loosely correlated with TTAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIF jumps, then TTAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIF
1D Price
Change %
LIF100%
-4.31%
TTAN - LIF
41%
Loosely correlated
+3.42%
CDNS - LIF
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
GRAB - LIF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
SHOP - LIF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.80%
PCOR - LIF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
More