CELH
Price
$62.07
Change
+$0.12 (+0.19%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
16.01B
75 days until earnings call
CHFHY
Price
$6.70
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.23B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CELH vs CHFHY

Header iconCELH vs CHFHY Comparison
Open Charts CELH vs CHFHYBanner chart's image
Celsius Holdings
Price$62.07
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
Volume$4.16M
Capitalization16.01B
China Foods
Price$6.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$763
Capitalization1.23B
CELH vs CHFHY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CELH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CHFHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CELH vs. CHFHY commentary
Aug 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELH is a Buy and CHFHY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 22, 2025
Stock price -- (CELH: $62.07 vs. CHFHY: $5.85)
Brand notoriety: CELH and CHFHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CELH: 59% vs. CHFHY: 100%
Market capitalization -- CELH: $16.01B vs. CHFHY: $1.23B
CELH [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $16.01B. CHFHY’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $1.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $304.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $20.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CELH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCHFHY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CELH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CHFHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CELH is a better buy in the long-term than CHFHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CELH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CHFHY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CELH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CHFHY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CELH and CHFHY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CELH (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +9.53% price change this week, while CHFHY (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

CELH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-1.55% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CELH($16B) has a higher market cap than CHFHY($1.23B). CELH has higher P/E ratio than CHFHY: CELH (163.34) vs CHFHY (8.53). CELH YTD gains are higher at: 135.649 vs. CHFHY (0.000). CHFHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.73B vs. CELH (184M). CHFHY has higher revenues than CELH: CHFHY (21.5B) vs CELH (1.67B).
CELHCHFHYCELH / CHFHY
Capitalization16B1.23B1,301%
EBITDA184M2.73B7%
Gain YTD135.6490.000-
P/E Ratio163.348.531,915%
Revenue1.67B21.5B8%
Total Cash615MN/A-
Total Debt863MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CELH vs CHFHY: Fundamental Ratings
CELH
CHFHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2945
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5360
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3672
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
353
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHFHY's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CELH (94) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CHFHY’s stock grew significantly faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.

CELH's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CHFHY (60) in the null industry. This means that CELH’s stock grew similarly to CHFHY’s over the last 12 months.

CELH's SMR Rating (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CHFHY (100) in the null industry. This means that CELH’s stock grew similarly to CHFHY’s over the last 12 months.

CELH's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHFHY (72) in the null industry. This means that CELH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHFHY’s over the last 12 months.

CELH's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHFHY (53) in the null industry. This means that CELH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHFHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CELHCHFHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
7%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
81%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CELH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CHFHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FISPX8.54N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Max-Cap Index IS
WEECX11.47N/A
N/A
TETON Westwood Equity A
CSEYX20.98N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Global Equity Inst3
MTERX58.14N/A
N/A
MFS Technology R2
FPADX12.52N/A
N/A
Fidelity Emerging Markets Idx

CELH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CELH has been loosely correlated with MNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CELH jumps, then MNST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELH
1D Price
Change %
CELH100%
+0.19%
MNST - CELH
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
KO - CELH
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
KDP - CELH
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
PEP - CELH
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
CCEP - CELH
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
More

CHFHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHFHY and CELH have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHFHY and CELH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHFHY
1D Price
Change %
CHFHY100%
N/A
CELH - CHFHY
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
CCOJY - CHFHY
3%
Poorly correlated
-6.26%
KDP - CHFHY
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
CCOJF - CHFHY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCHBF - CHFHY
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More