CELH
Price
$58.70
Change
-$0.20 (-0.34%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.13B
30 days until earnings call
CHFHY
Price
$11.00
Change
+$4.30 (+64.18%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.59B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CELH vs CHFHY

Header iconCELH vs CHFHY Comparison
Open Charts CELH vs CHFHYBanner chart's image
Celsius Holdings
Price$58.70
Change-$0.20 (-0.34%)
Volume$4.5M
Capitalization15.13B
China Foods
Price$11.00
Change+$4.30 (+64.18%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.59B
CELH vs CHFHY Comparison Chart in %
CELH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CHFHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CELH vs. CHFHY commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELH is a StrongBuy and CHFHY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CELH: $58.70 vs. CHFHY: $11.00)
Brand notoriety: CELH and CHFHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CELH: 68% vs. CHFHY: 24%
Market capitalization -- CELH: $15.13B vs. CHFHY: $1.59B
CELH [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $15.13B. CHFHY’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $1.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $286.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $20.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CELH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCHFHY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CELH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CHFHY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHFHY is a better buy in the long-term than CELH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CELH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CHFHY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CELH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CHFHY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CELH is a better buy in the short-term than CHFHY.

Price Growth

CELH (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +7.92% price change this week, while CHFHY (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

CELH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-0.89% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CELH($15.1B) has a higher market cap than CHFHY($1.59B). CELH has higher P/E ratio than CHFHY: CELH (155.00) vs CHFHY (12.55). CELH YTD gains are higher at: 122.855 vs. CHFHY (87.980). CHFHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.73B vs. CELH (184M). CHFHY has higher revenues than CELH: CHFHY (21.5B) vs CELH (1.67B).
CELHCHFHYCELH / CHFHY
Capitalization15.1B1.59B948%
EBITDA184M2.73B7%
Gain YTD122.85587.980140%
P/E Ratio155.0012.551,235%
Revenue1.67B21.5B8%
Total Cash615MN/A-
Total Debt863MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CELH vs CHFHY: Fundamental Ratings
CELH
CHFHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
566
SMR RATING
1..100
6651
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
314
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHFHY's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CELH (93) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CHFHY’s stock grew significantly faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.

CHFHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELH (56) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CHFHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.

CHFHY's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CELH (66) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CHFHY’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.

CHFHY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CELH (41) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CHFHY’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.

CELH's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CHFHY (14) in the null industry. This means that CELH’s stock grew similarly to CHFHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CELHCHFHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
19%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
81%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CELH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CHFHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BEMAX11.380.07
+0.62%
Brandes Emerging Markets Value A
BOSCX18.100.08
+0.44%
BNY Mellon Sm Cp Val C
TPLIX15.090.01
+0.07%
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth I
BREUX41.95-0.04
-0.10%
Baron Real Estate R6
EQPGX26.64-0.06
-0.22%
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth I

CELH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CELH has been loosely correlated with MNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CELH jumps, then MNST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELH
1D Price
Change %
CELH100%
-0.34%
MNST - CELH
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
PEP - CELH
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
KO - CELH
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
KDP - CELH
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
CCEP - CELH
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
More

CHFHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHFHY and CELH have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHFHY and CELH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHFHY
1D Price
Change %
CHFHY100%
N/A
CELH - CHFHY
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
CCOJY - CHFHY
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.27%
KDP - CHFHY
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
CCOJF - CHFHY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCHBF - CHFHY
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More