Advertisement
CENTA vs HRL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CENTA is a Buy and HRL is a Buy.
CENTA | HRL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 99 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 70 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HRL's Valuation (10) in the Food Meat Or Fish Or Dairy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CENTA (54) in the Consumer Sundries industry. This means that HRL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CENTA’s over the last 12 months.
CENTA's Profit vs Risk Rating (99) in the Consumer Sundries industry is in the same range as HRL (100) in the Food Meat Or Fish Or Dairy industry. This means that CENTA’s stock grew similarly to HRL’s over the last 12 months.
CENTA's SMR Rating (70) in the Consumer Sundries industry is in the same range as HRL (84) in the Food Meat Or Fish Or Dairy industry. This means that CENTA’s stock grew similarly to HRL’s over the last 12 months.
CENTA's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Consumer Sundries industry is in the same range as HRL (64) in the Food Meat Or Fish Or Dairy industry. This means that CENTA’s stock grew similarly to HRL’s over the last 12 months.
HRL's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Food Meat Or Fish Or Dairy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CENTA (49) in the Consumer Sundries industry. This means that HRL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CENTA’s over the last 12 months.
| CENTA | HRL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 25 days ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 37% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CENTA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while HRL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CENTA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HRL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CENTA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HRL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CENTA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HRL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CENTA (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -1.48% price change this week, while HRL (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -5.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.87%.
Reported Earning Dates
CENTA is expected to report earnings on Nov 30, 2026.
HRL is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (-3.35% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OILD | 30.85 | 0.93 | +3.11% |
| MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. - 3x Inverse Leveraged ETN (OILD) | |||
| RONB | 23.47 | 0.03 | +0.13% |
| Baron First Principles ETF (RONB) | |||
| JLS | 16.15 | N/A | N/A |
| Nuveen Mortgage and Income Fund | |||
| ECAT | 14.07 | -0.01 | -0.07% |
| BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | |||
| BPH | 70.31 | -0.46 | -0.65% |
| BP PLC ADRHEDGED | |||
CENTA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CENTA has been closely correlated with CENT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 97% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CENTA jumps, then CENT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CENTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENTA | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| CENT - CENTA | 97% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| HRL - CENTA | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
| FLO - CENTA | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.20% | ||
| MZTI - CENTA | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
| INGR - CENTA | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
More | ||||
HRL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HRL has been loosely correlated with CAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HRL jumps, then CAG could also see price increases.